[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Endobronchial Ultrasound Plus Fluoroscopy Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Bronchoscopy: A Comparison of Diagnostic Yields in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions

  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Even though fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy has been well developed, the diagnostic yield of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) remains unsatisfying. Therefore, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) has been implemented recently to enhance the possibility of attaining true diagnosis. However, there are few studies that directly compare the success rate of fiber-optic bronchoscopy with fluoroscopic guidance to that of EBUS guidance in the diagnosis of PPLs in the same institute and in the same study period. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of EBUS plus fluoroscopy guidance with that of fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy in the diagnosis of PPLs.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 114 patients who were diagnosed with PPLs and underwent either EBUS plus fluoroscopy or fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy. The diagnostic yields of both modalities were calculated.

Results

The mean diameter of the PPLs measured by computed tomography of the chest was 23.7 mm. EBUS plus fluoroscopy obtained higher diagnostic yield than fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy (82.5 vs. 57.9%; P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that for PPLs larger than 20 mm, the accuracy of EBUS plus fluoroscopy was not different from that of the fluoroscopy-guided technique (85.7 vs. 72.2%, respectively; P = 0.19). In contrast, for lesions smaller than 20 mm, EBUS plus fluoroscopy guidance provided significantly greater diagnostic performance than fluoroscopy-guided bronchoscopy (79.3 vs. 33.3%; P = 0.001).

Conclusions

Bronchoscopy under EBUS and fluoroscopy guidance improved the diagnostic yield of PPLs, especially of those smaller than 20 mm in diameter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Abbreviations

PPLs:

Peripheral pulmonary lesions

FB:

Fiber-optic bronchoscopy

CT:

Computed tomography

EBUS:

Endobronchial ultrasound

GS:

Guide sheath

BAL:

Bronchoalveolar lavage

References

  1. Mazzone PJ, Stoller JK (2002) The pulmonologist’s perspective regarding the solitary pulmonary nodule. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 14:250–260

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wallace JM, Deutsch AL (1982) Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy and percutaneous needle lung aspiration for evaluating the solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 81:665–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Torrington KG, Kern JD (1993) The utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in the evaluation of the solitary pulmonary nodule. Chest 104:1021–1024

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chechani V (1996) Bronchoscopic diagnosis of solitary pulmonary nodules and lung masses in the absence of endobronchial abnormality. Chest 109:620–625

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zavala DC (1975) Diagnostic fiberoptic bronchoscopy: techniques and results of biopsy in 600 patients. Chest 68:12–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kvale PA, Bode FR, Kini S (1976) Diagnostic accuracy in lung cancer; comparison of techniques used in association with flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 69:752–757

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cortese DA, McDougall JC (1979) Biopsy and brushing of peripheral lung cancer with fluoroscopic guidance. Chest 75:141–145

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mori K, Yanase N, Kaneko M, Ono R, Ikeda S (1989) Diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer in cases of tumors 2 cm or less in size. Chest 95:304–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Baaklini WA, Reinoso MA, Gorin AB, Sharafkaneh A, Manian P (2000) Diagnostic yield of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in evaluating solitary pulmonary nodules. Chest 117:1049–1054

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stringfield JT, Markowitz DJ, Bentz RR, Welch MH, Weg JG (1977) The effect of tumor size and location on diagnosis by fiberoptic bronchoscopy. Chest 72:474–476

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gasparini S, Ferretti M, Secchi EB, Baldelli S, Zuccatosta L, Gusella P (1995) Integration of transbronchial and percutaneous approach in the diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary nodules or masses. Experience with 1,027 consecutive cases. Chest 108:131–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Naidich DP, Sussman R, Kutcher WL, Aranda CP, Garay SM, Ettenger NA (1988) Solitary pulmonary nodules. CT-bronchoscopic correlation. Chest 93:595–598

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Herth FJ, Ernst A, Becker HD (2002) Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial lung biopsy in solitary pulmonary nodules and peripheral lesions. Eur Respir J 20:972–974

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kikuchi E, Yamazaki K, Sukoh N, Kikuchi J, Asahina H, Imura M, Onodera Y, Kurimoto N, Kinoshita I, Nishimura M (2004) Endobronchial ultrasonography with guide-sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions. Eur Respir J 24:533–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurimoto N, Miyazawa T, Okimasa S, Maeda A, Oiwa H, Miyazu Y, Murayama M (2004) Endobronchial ultrasonography using a guide sheath increases the ability to diagnose peripheral pulmonary lesions endoscopically. Chest 126:959–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinfort DP, Khor YH, Manser RL, Irving LB (2011) Radial probe endobronchial ultrasound for the diagnosis of peripheral lung cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Respir J 37:902–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Shirakawa T, Imamura F, Hamamoto J, Honda I, Fukushima K, Sugimoto M, Shirkakusa T (2004) Usefulness of endobronchial ultrasonography for transbronchial lung biopsies of peripheral lung lesions. Respiration 71:260–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kurimoto N, Murayama M, Yoshioka S, Nishisaka T (2002) Analysis of the internal structure of peripheral pulmonary lesions using endobronchial ultrasonography. Chest 122:1887–1894

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Asano F, Matsuno Y, Tsuzuku A, Anzai M, Shinagawa N, Yamazaki K, Ishida T, Moriya H (2008) Diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions using a bronchoscope insertion guidance system combined with endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath. Lung Cancer 60:366–373

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rivera MP, Mehta AC, American College of Chest Physicians (2007) Initial diagnosis of lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition). Chest 132:131S–148S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yoshikawa M, Sukoh N, Yamazaki K, Kanazawa K, Fukumoto S, Harada M, Kikuchi E, Munakata M, Nishimura M, Isobe H (2007) Diagnostic value of endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath for peripheral pulmonary lesions without X-ray fluoroscopy. Chest 131:1788–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Steinfort D, Irving L (2008) Use of fluoroscopy during endobronchial ultrasonography for transbronchial lung biopsies of peripheral lung lesions. J Thorac Oncol 3:685–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boonsarngsuk V, Raweelert P, Sukprapruet A, Chaiprasithikul R, Kiatboonsri S (2010) Factors affecting the diagnostic yield of flexible bronchoscopy without guidance in pulmonary nodules or masses. Singapore Med J 51:660–665

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest and no financial relationship with a commercial entity that has an interest in the subject of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand

    Viboon Boonsarngsuk, Pensupa Raweelert & Sabaithip Juthakarn

Authors
  1. Viboon Boonsarngsuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pensupa Raweelert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sabaithip Juthakarn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viboon Boonsarngsuk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boonsarngsuk, V., Raweelert, P. & Juthakarn, S. Endobronchial Ultrasound Plus Fluoroscopy Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Bronchoscopy: A Comparison of Diagnostic Yields in Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions. Lung 190, 233–237 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9359-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9359-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation