[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Acoustic data-driven framework for structural defect reconstruction: a manifold learning perspective

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Data-driven quantitative defect reconstruction using ultrasonic guided waves has recently demonstrated great potential in the area of non-destructive testing (NDT) and structural health monitoring (SHM). In this paper, a novel deep learning-based framework, called Deep-guide, has been proposed to convert the inverse guided wave scattering problem into a data-driven manifold learning progress for defect reconstruction. The architecture of Deep-guide network consists of the efficient encoder-projection-decoder blocks to automatically realize the end-to-end mapping of noisy guided wave reflection coefficients in the wavenumber domain to defect profiles in the spatial domain by the manifold distribution principle and intelligent learning. Toward this, results by the modified boundary element method for efficient calculations of scattering fields of guided waves have been generated as acoustic emission signals of the Deep-guide to facilitate the training and extract the features homeomorphically. The correctness, robustness, and efficiency of the proposed framework have been demonstrated throughout several examples and experimental tests of circular defects. It has been noted that Deep-guide has the ability to achieve the high-quality defect reconstructions and provides valuable insights into the development of effective data-driven techniques for structural health monitoring and complex defect reconstructions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

References

  1. Rose JL (2002) A baseline and vision of ultrasonic guided wave inspection potential. J Pressure Vessel Technol 124(3):273–282. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1491272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Qing-Tian D, Chun YZ (2011) Propagation of guided waves in bonded composite structures with tapered adhesive layer[J]. Appl Math Model 35(11):5369–5381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.04.042

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Broda D, Staszewski WJ, Martowicz A, Uhl T, Silberschmidt VV (2014) Modelling of nonlinear crack–wave interactions for damage detection based on ultrasound—a review. J Sound Vib 333(4):1097–1118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsv.2013.09.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hai B, Bause M, Kuberry PA (2019) Modeling concept and numerical simulation of ultrasonic wave propagation in a moving fluid-structure domain based on a monolithic approach. Appl Math Model 75:916–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2019.07.007

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Rose J, Pelts S, Cho Y (2000) Modeling for flaw sizing potential with guided waves. J Nondestr Eval 19(2):55–66. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006621308307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rose LRF, Wang CH (2004) Mindlin plate theory for damage detection: source solutions. J Acoust Soc Am 116(1):154–171. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1739482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose LRF, Wang CH (2010) Mindlin plate theory for damage detection: Imaging of flexural inhomogeneities. J Acoust Soc Am 127(2):754–763. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3277217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang B, Hirose S (2012) Inverse problem for shape reconstruction of plate-thinning by guided SH-waves. Mater Trans 53(10):1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.2320/matertrans.I-M2012823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang B, Hirose S (2012) Shape reconstruction of plate thinning using reflection coefficients of ultrasonic lamb waves: a numerical approach. ISIJ Int 52(7):1320–1327. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.52.1320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Singh D, Castaings M, Bacon C (2011) Sizing strip-like defects in plates using guided waves. NDT E Int 44(5):394–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Castaings M, Singh D, Viot P (2012) Sizing of impact damages in composite materials using ultrasonic guided waves. NDT E Int 46(1):22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2011.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Da Y, Dong G, Wang B, Liu D, Qian Z (2018) A novel approach to surface defect detection. Int J Eng Sci 133:181–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2018.09.005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu F, Pan E, Qian Z, Wang Y (2019) Dispersion curves, mode shapes, stresses and energies of SH and lamb waves in layered elastic nanoplates with surface/interface effect. Int J Eng Sci 142:170–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2019.06.003

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Arridge S, Maass P, Öktem O, Schönlieb C (2019) Solving inverse problems using data-driven models. Acta Numer 28:1–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0962492919000059

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Reader AJ, Corda G, Mehranian A, Costa-Luis CD, Ellis S, Schnabel JA (2021) Deep learning for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci 5(1):1–25. https://doi.org/10.1109/TRPMS.2020.3014786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lecun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G (2015) Deep learning. Nature (London) 521(7553):436–444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu K, Darve E (2021) Solving inverse problems in stochastic models using deep neural networks and adversarial training. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 384(C):113976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2021.113976

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Feng J, Teng Q, Li B, He X, Chen H, Li Y (2020) An end-to-end three-dimensional reconstruction framework of porous media from a single two-dimensional image based on deep learning. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 368:113043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113043

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Tamaddon-Jahromi HR, Chakshu NK, Sazonov I, Evans LM, Thomas H, Nithiarasu P (2020) Data-driven inverse modelling through neural network (deep learning) and computational heat transfer. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 369:113217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113217

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Pled F, Desceliers C, Zhang T (2021) A robust solution of a statistical inverse problem in multiscale computational mechanics using an artificial neural network. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 373:113540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113540

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Chen H, Zhang Y, Kalra MK, Lin F, Chen Y, Liao P, Zhou J, Wang G (2017) Low-dose CT with a residual encoder-decoder convolutional neural network. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 36(12):2524–2535. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2715284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu B, Liu JZ, Cauley SF, Rosen BR, Rosen MS (2018) Image reconstruction by domain-transform manifold learning. Nature (London) 555(7697):487–492. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Häggström I, Schmidtlein CR, Campanella G, Fuchs TJ (2019) DeepPET: a deep encoder–decoder network for directly solving the PET image reconstruction inverse problem. Med Image Anal 54:253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao Y, Gao L, Li X (2021) A generative adversarial network based deep learning method for low-quality defect image reconstruction and recognition. IEEE Trans Industr Inf 17(5):3231–3240. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2020.3008703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piao G, Guo J, Hu T, Leung H, Deng Y (2019) Fast reconstruction of 3-D defect profile from MFL signals using key physics-based parameters and SVM. NDT E Int 103:26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2019.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang B, Yang D, Hong X, Jin G (2022) Deep emulational semi-supervised knowledge probability imaging method for plate structural health monitoring using guided waves. Eng Comput 38(5):4151–4166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-022-01711-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Song H, Yusa N (2021) Inverse analysis of low frequency electromagnetic signals for sizing local wall thinning using a multivariate probabilistic model. NDT E Int 119:102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2021.102417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tenenbaum JB, De Silva V, Langford JC (2000) A global geometric framework for nonlinear dimensionality reduction. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 290(5500):2319–2323. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lei N, An D, Guo Y, Su K, Liu S, Luo Z, Yau S, Gu X (2020) A geometric understanding of deep learning. Engineering (Beijing, China) 6(3):361–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eng.2019.09.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vincent P, Larochelle H, Bengio Y, Manzagol P (2008) Extracting and composing robust features with denoising autoencoders. Machine Learning, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference (ICML 2008), Helsinki, Finland, June 5–9, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390156.1390294

  31. Van Der Maaten L, Hinton G (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 9:2579–2625

    Google Scholar 

  32. Roweis ST, Saul LK (2000) Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. Science (American Association for the Advancement of Science) 290(5500):2323–2326. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.290.5500.2323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. De Silva V, Tenenbaum JB (2002) Global versus local methods in nonlinear dimensionality reduction. NIPS 2002: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2002:705–712

  34. Cai J, Shi L, Qing XP (2013) A time-distance domain transform method for lamb wave dispersion compensation considering signal waveform correction. Smart Mater Struct 22(10):105024. https://doi.org/10.1088/0964-1726/22/10/105024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marin L (2005) Detection of cavities in helmholtz-type equations using the boundary element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(36):4006–4023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2004.10.005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Yang C, Wang B, Qian Z (2021) Three dimensional modified BEM analysis of forward scattering problems in elastic solids. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 122:145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2020.10.012

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Achenbach JD (2004) Reciprocity in elastodynamics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  38. Da Y, Li Q, Wang B, Liu D, Qian Z (2021) A more accurate reconstruction method for detecting large-depth defects in plates using SH guided waves. Acta Mech Solida Sin 34(2):174–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10338-020-00197-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12061131013, 12211530064 and 12172171), the State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control of Mechanical Structures at NUAA (No. MCMS-E-0520K02), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Nos. NE2020002 and NS2019007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China for Creative Research Groups (No. 51921003), Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX21_0184), the National Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (No. BK20211176), the Interdisciplinary Innovation Fund for Doctoral Students of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics [No. KXKCXJJ202208] and a project funded by the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhenghua Qian or Dianzi Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Q., Liu, F., Li, P. et al. Acoustic data-driven framework for structural defect reconstruction: a manifold learning perspective. Engineering with Computers 40, 2401–2424 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01931-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01931-7

Keywords

Navigation