[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aimed to optimize the artificial neural network (ANN) with one of the well-established optimization algorithms called particle swarm optimization (PSO) for the problem of ground response approximation in short structures. Various studies showed that ANN-based solutions are a reliable method for complex engineering problems. Predicting the ground surface respond to seismic loading is one of the engineering problems that still has not received any ANN solution. Therefore, this paper aimed to assess the application of hybrid PSO-based ANN models to the calculation of horizontal deflection of columns in short building after being subjected to a significant seismic loading (e.g., The Chi-Chi earthquake used as one of the input databases). To prepare both of the training and testing datasets, for the ANN and PSO-ANN network models, a series of finite element (FE) modeling were performed. The used FEM simulation database consists of 8324 training datasets and 2081 testing datasets that is equal to 80% and 20% of the whole database, respectively. The input includes Chi-Chi earthquake dynamic time (s), friction angle (φ), dilation angle (ψ), unit weight (γ), soil elastic modulus (E), Poisson’s ratio (v), structure axial stiffness (EA), and bending stiffness (EI) where the output was taken horizontal deflection of the columns at their highest level (Ux). The result indicates higher reliability of the PSO-ANN model in estimating the ground response and horizontal deflection of structural columns in short structures after being subjected to earthquake loading.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Moayedi H, Nazir R, Ghareh S, Sobhanmanesh A, Tan YC (2018) Performance analysis of piled-raft foundation system of varying pile lengths in controlling angular distortion. Soil Mech Found Eng 55:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kthatir A, Tehami M, Khatir S, Wahab MA (2018) Republished Paper. Multiple damage detection and localization in beam-like and complex structures using co-ordinate modal assurance criterion combined with firefly and genetic algorithms (Reprinted from Jounral of Vibroengineering 18:5063–5073 2016). J VibroEng 20:832–842

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dieu Tien B, Viet-Ha N, Nhat-Duc H (2018) Prediction of soil compression coefficient for urban housing project using novel integration machine learning approach of swarm intelligence and multi-layer perceptron neural network. Adv Eng Inform 38:593–604

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yaseen ZM, Karami H, Ehteram M, Mohd NS, Mousavi SF, Hin LS, Kisi O, Farzin S, Kim S, El-Shafie A (2018) Optimization of reservoir operation using new hybrid algorithm. KSCE J Civil Eng 22:4668–4680

    Google Scholar 

  5. Qin S, Zhou Y-L, Cao H, Wahab MA (2018) Model updating in complex bridge structures using kriging model ensemble with genetic algorithm. KSCE J Civil Eng 22:3567–3578

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jonbi J, Arini RN, Anwar B, Fulazzaky MA (2018) Effect of added the polycarboxylate ether on slump retention and compressive strength of the high-performance concrete. In: Hajek P, Han AL, Kristiawan S, Chan WT, Ismail MB, Gan BS, Sriravindrarajah R, Hidayat BA (eds) 4th international conference on rehabilitation and maintenance in civil engineering

  7. Nguyen H, Bui X-N (2018) Predicting blast-induced air overpressure: a robust artificial intelligence system based on artificial neural networks and random forest. Nat Resour Res 29:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Bui H-B, Mai N-L (2018) A comparative study of artificial neural networks in predicting blast-induced air-blast overpressure at Deo Nai open-pit coal mine. Vietnam. Neural Comput Appl 31:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bui X-N, Nguyen H, Le H-A, Bui H-B, Do N-H (2019) Prediction of blast-induced air over-pressure in open-pit mine: assessment of different artificial intelligence techniques. Nat Resour Res 29:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Tran Q-H, Le T-Q, Do N-H (2019) Evaluating and predicting blast-induced ground vibration in open-cast mine using ANN: a case study in Vietnam. SN Appl Sci, 1:125

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Tran Q-H, Mai N-L (2019) A new soft computing model for estimating and controlling blast-produced ground vibration based on hierarchical K-means clustering and cubist algorithms. Appl Soft Comput 77:376–386

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pham BT, Nguyen MD, Bui KTT, Prakash I, Chapi K, Bui DT (2019) A novel artificial intelligence approach based on multi-layer perceptron neural network and biogeography-based optimization for predicting coefficient of consolidation of soil. Catena 173:302–311

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nhat-Duc H, Quoc-Lam N, Dieu Tien B (2018) Image processing-based classification of asphalt pavement cracks using support vector machine optimized by artificial bee colony. J. Comput. Civ. Eng 32(5):04018037

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen-Thoi T, Tran-Viet A, Nguyen-Minh N, Vo-Duy T, Ho-Huu V (2018) A combination of damage locating vector method (DLV) and differential evolution algorithm (DE) for structural damage assessment. Front Struct Civil Eng 12:92–108

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lacy SJ, Prevost JH (1987) Nonlinear seismic response analysis of earth dams. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 6:48–63

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2017) Comparison analysis of bearing capacity approaches for the strip footing on layered soils. Arab J Sci Eng 42(9):3711–3722

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hajikhodaverdikhana P, Nazari M, Mohsenizadeh M, Shamshirband S, Chau K-W (2018) Earthquake prediction with meteorological data by particle filter-based support vector regression. Eng Appl Comput Fluid Mech 12:679–688

    Google Scholar 

  18. Men F (2002) Investigation of earthquake mechanisms and their impact on certain basic concepts in earthquake engineering and seismology. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 1:281–291

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arulmoli K, Martin GR, Gasparro MG, Shahrestani S, Buzzoni G (2004) Design of pile foundations for liquefaction-induced lateral spread displacements. Amer Soc Civil Engineers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gulkan P, Yazgan U (2005) Raised drift demands for framed buildings during near-field earthquakes. In: Gulkan P, Anderson JG (eds) Directions in strong motion instrumentation. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  21. Qu HL, Li RF, Hu HG, Jia HY, Zhang JJ (2016) An approach of seismic design for sheet pile retaining wall based on capacity spectrum method. Geomech Eng 11:309–323

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thomas S, Pillai GN, Pal K, Jagtap P (2016) Prediction of ground motion parameters using randomized ANFIS (RANFIS). Appl Soft Comput 40:624–634

    Google Scholar 

  23. Funck T, Dickmann T, Rihm R, Krastel S, LykkeAndersen H, Schmincke HU (1996) Reflection seismic investigations in the volcaniclastic apron of Gran Canaria and implications for its volcanic evolution. Geophys J Int 125:519–536

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pijush S (2010) Support vector machine for evaluating seismic liquefaction potential using standard penetration test. Disaster Adv 3:20–25

    Google Scholar 

  25. Latifi N, Vahedifard F, Ghazanfari E, Horpibulsuk S, Marto A, Williams J (2017) Sustainable improvement of clays using low-carbon nontraditional additive. Int J Geomech 18:04017162

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uncuoglu E (2015) The bearing capacity of square footings on a sand layer overlying clay. Geomech Eng 9:287–311

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ahmadi MM, Kouchaki BM (2016) New and simple equations for ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings on two-layered clays: numerical study. Int J Geomech 16:11

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gao W, Guirao JLG, Abdel-Aty M, Xi W (2019) An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs. Discret Contin Dyn Syst-S 12:877–886

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Gao W, Wu H, Siddiqui MK, Baig AQ (2018) Study of biological networks using graph theory. Saudi J Biol Sci 25:1212–1219

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gao W, Wang W, Dimitrov D, Wang Y (2018) Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating. Arab J Chem 11:793–801

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nguyen H, Bui X-N, Bui H-B, Cuong DT (2019) Developing an XGBoost model to predict blast-induced peak particle velocity in an open-pit mine: a case study. Acta Geophys 67:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muthusamy S, Manickam LP, Murugesan V, Muthukumaran C, Pugazhendhi A (2019) Pectin extraction from Helianthus annuus (sunflower) heads using RSM and ANN modelling by a genetic algorithm approach. Int J Biol Macromol 124:750–758

    Google Scholar 

  33. Safaei MR, Karimipour A, Abdollahi A, Truong Khang N (2018) The investigation of thermal radiation and free convection heat transfer mechanisms of nanofluid inside a shallow cavity by lattice Boltzmann method. Phys A-Stat Mech Appl 509:515–535

    Google Scholar 

  34. Karimipour A, D’Orazio A, Goodarzi M (2018) Develop the lattice Boltzmann method to simulate the slip velocity and temperature domain of buoyancy forces of FMWCNT nanoparticles in water through a micro flow imposed to the specified heat flux. Phys A-Stat Mech Appl 509:729–745

    Google Scholar 

  35. Goodarzi M, D’Orazio A, Keshavarzi A, Mousavi S, Karimipour A (2018) Develop the nano scale method of lattice Boltzmann to predict the fluid flow and heat transfer of air in the inclined lid driven cavity with a large heat source inside, two case studies: pure natural convection & mixed convection. Phys A-Stat Mech Appl 509:210–233

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alrashed AAAA, Karimipour A, Bagherzadeh SA, Safaei MR, Afrand M (2018) Electro- and thermophysical properties of water-based nanofluids containing copper ferrite nanoparticles coated with silica: experimental data, modeling through enhanced ANN and curve fitting. Int J Heat Mass Transf 127:925–935

    Google Scholar 

  37. Asadizadeh M, Hossaini MF (2016) Predicting rock mass deformation modulus by artificial intelligence approach based on dilatometer tests. Arab J Geosci 9:15

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hasanzadehshooiili H, Mahinroosta R, Lakirouhani A, Oshtaghi V (2014) Using artificial neural network (ANN) in prediction of collapse settlements of sandy gravels. Arab J Geosci 7:2303–2314

    Google Scholar 

  39. Gao W, He TY (2017) Displacement prediction in geotechnical engineering based on evolutionary neural network. Geomech Eng 13:845–860

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Subramaniam P, Gue S-S (2017) Application and design of transition piled embankment with surcharged prefabricated vertical drain intersection.over soft ground. Arab J Sci Eng 43(4):1573–1582

    Google Scholar 

  41. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Subramaniam P, Ghareh S (2017) Ground improvement using SPVD and RPE. Arab J Geosci 10:515

    Google Scholar 

  42. Moayedi H, Nazir R (2017) Malaysian experiences of peat stabilization, State of the Art. Geotech Geol Eng 36(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  43. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Nazir R (2017) Evaluation of maintained load test (MLT) and pile driving analyzer (PDA) in measuring bearing capacity of driven reinforced concrete piles. Soil Mech Found Eng 54:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  44. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M (2017) Uplift resistance of belled and multi-belled piles in loose sand. Measurement 109:346–353

    Google Scholar 

  45. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M (2017) Physico-chemical and shrinkage properties of highly organic soil treated with non-traditional additives. Geotech Geol Eng 35:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  46. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Noor RBM, Ghareh S (2016) Development of new attenuation equation for subduction mechanisms in Malaysia water. Arab J Geosci 9:741

    Google Scholar 

  47. Nazir R, Ghareh S, Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2016) The influence of rainfall intensity on soil loss mass from cellular confined slopes. Measurement 81:13–25

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Tourtiz A (2015) Appraisal of reliable skin friction variation in a bored pile. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Geotech Eng 168:75–86

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moayedi H, Nazir R, Mosallanezhad M (2015) Determination of reliable stress and strain distributions along bored piles. Soil Mech Found Eng 51:285–291

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kassim KA, Rashid ASA, Kueh ABH, Yah CS, Siang LC, Noor NM, Moayedi H (2015) Development of rapid consolidation equipment for cohesive soil. Geotech Geol Eng 33:167–174

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nazir R, Moayedi H, Pratikso A, Mosallanezhad M (2014) The uplift load capacity of an enlarged base pier embedded in dry sand. Arab J Geosci 1–12

  52. Moayedi H, Nazir R, Kazemian S, Huat BK (2014) Microstructure analysis of electrokinetically stabilized peat. Measurement 48:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  53. Moayedi H, Nazir R, Kassim KA, Huat BK (2014) Measurement of the electrokinetic properties of peats treated with chemical solutions. Measurement 49:289–295

    Google Scholar 

  54. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Nazir R, Kazemian S, Huat BK (2014) Peaty soil improvement by using cationic reagent grout and electrokintic method. Geotech Geol Eng 32:933–947

    Google Scholar 

  55. Chang MH, Kuo CP, Shau SH, Hsu RE (2011) Comparison of SPT-N-based analysis methods in evaluation of liquefaction potential during the 1999 Chi-chi earthquake in Taiwan. Comput Geotech 38:393–406

    Google Scholar 

  56. Gao W, Guirao JLG, Basavanagoud B, Wu J (2018) Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm. Inf Sci 467:35–58

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. Gao W, Dimitrov D, Abdo H (2018) Tight independent set neighborhood union condition for fractional critical deleted graphs and ID deleted graphs. Discret Contin Dyn Syst 12(4&5):711–721

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  58. Asadi A, Moayedi H, Huat BBK, Parsaie A, Taha MR (2011) Artificial neural networks approach for electrochemical resistivity of highly organic soil. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:1135–1145

    Google Scholar 

  59. Asadi A, Moayedi H, Huat BBK, Boroujeni FZ, Parsaie A, Sojoudi S (2011) Prediction of zeta potential for tropical peat in the presence of different cations using artificial neural networks. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:1146–1158

    Google Scholar 

  60. Moayedi H, Raftari M, Sharifi A, Jusoh WAW, Rashid ASA (2019) Optimization of ANFIS with GA and PSO estimating α ratio in driven piles. Eng Comput 36:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  61. Alnaqi AA, Moayedi H, Shahsavar A, Nguyen TK (2019) Prediction of energetic performance of a building integrated photovoltaic/thermal system thorough artificial neural network and hybrid particle swarm optimization models. Energy Convers Manag 183:137–148

    Google Scholar 

  62. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Mehrabi M, Safuan ARA, Biswajeet P (2018) Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique. Eng Comput 35:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  63. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Artificial intelligence design charts for predicting friction capacity of driven pile in clay. Neural Comput Appl 31:1–17

    Google Scholar 

  64. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods. Appl Soft Comput 66:208–219

    Google Scholar 

  65. Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2017) Developing hybrid artificial neural network model for predicting uplift resistance of screw piles. Arab J Geosci 10:10

    Google Scholar 

  66. Moayedi H, Armaghani DJ (2017) Optimizing an ANN model with ICA for estimating bearing capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil. Eng Comput 34(2):347–356

    Google Scholar 

  67. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Applicability of a CPT-based neural network solution in predicting load-settlement responses of bored pile. Int. J. Geomech 18(6):06018009

    Google Scholar 

  68. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Mehrabi M, Safuan ARA, Biswajeet P (2018) Modification of landslide susceptibility mapping using optimized PSO-ANN technique. Eng Comput 35:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  69. Moayedi H, Rezaei A (2017) An artificial neural network approach for under-reamed piles subjected to uplift forces in dry sand. Neural Comput Appl 31(2):327–336

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Moayedi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, H., Moayedi, H., Foong, L.K. et al. Optimizing ANN models with PSO for predicting short building seismic response. Engineering with Computers 36, 823–837 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00733-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00733-0

Keywords

Navigation