Abstract
We consider a repeated electoral competition game between two parties, each representing a constituent with a given income level. Parties are unable to commit to a policy before the election; they choose a nonlinear income tax schedule once elected. In each period, citizens cast a vote either for the incumbent or for the challenger. We first show that there exist (pure strategy) subgame perfect equilibria where both parties choose the most-preferred tax schedule of their constituent, subject to the constraint that they are reelected. We characterize a specific class of these BPR (Best Policy with Reelection) equilibria in which one of the parties plays its constituent’s unconstrained optimal tax function. Equilibrium tax schedules are always piecewise linear. Depending on the income levels of the two parties’ constituents, we obtain either classical left-vs-right equilibria (where the poor vote for one party and the rich for the other one) or ends-against-the-middle equilibria (where both poor and rich vote for one party while the middle class votes for the other party). In both types of equilibria, both parties propose the same tax schedule to a subset of the population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abreu D (1988) On the theory of infinitely repeated games with discounting. Econometrica 52(2): 383–396
Banks JS, Duggan J (2008) A dynamic model of democratic elections in multidimensional policy spaces. Q J Polit Sci 3(3): 269–299
Baron D, Kalai E (1993) The simplest equilibria of a majority division game. J Econ Theory 61(2): 290–301
Bohn H, Stuart C (2005) Voting and nonlinear taxes in a stylized representative democracy. Working paper, UCSB
Carbonell-Nicolau O, Ok EA (2007) Voting over income taxation. J Econ Theory 134(1): 249–286
De Donder P, Hindriks J (2003) The politics of progressive income taxation with incentive effects. J Public Econ 87: 2491–2505
Duggan J (2000) Repeated elections with asymmetric information. Econ Polit 12: 109–136
Duggan J, Fey M (2005) Electoral competition with policy-motivated candidates. Games Econ Behav 51: 490–522
Persson T, Tabellini G (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge
Plott CR (1967) A notion of equilibrium and its possibility under majority rule. Am Econ Rev 57: 787–806
Roberts K (1977) Voting over income tax schedules. J Public Econ 8: 329–340
Roëll A (1996) Voting over nonlinear income tax schedules. Unpublished
Roemer JE (2001) Political competition: theory and applications. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Roemer JE (2006) Democracy, education and equality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Roemer JE (2010) A theory of income taxation where politicians focus upon core and swing voters. Soc Choice Welf (forthcoming)
Romer T (1975) Individual welfare, majority voting and the properties of a linear income tax. J Public Econ 7: 163–168
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Casamatta, G., Cremer, H. & De Donder, P. Repeated electoral competition over nonlinear income tax schedules. Soc Choice Welf 35, 535–574 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0462-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-010-0462-9