An overlooked effect of mandatory audit–firm rotation on investigation strategies

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (1992) Statement of position regarding mandatory rotation of audit firms of publicly held companies. AICPA, New York

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (1999a) Audit adjustments. Statement of Auditing Standard No. 89. AICPA, New York

• American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) (1999b) Audit Committee Communication. Statement of Auditing Standard No. 90. AICPA, New York

• Arrunada B, Paz-Ares C (1997) Mandatory rotation of company auditors: a critical examination. Int Rev Law Econ 17: 31–61

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bazerman MH, Morgan KP, Loewenstein GF (1997) The impossibility of auditor independence. Sloan Manag Rev 38: 89–94

  Google Scholar 

• Booth JR, Cornett MM, Tehranian H (2002) Boards of directors, ownership, and regulation. J Bank Finance 26: 1973–1996

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carcello JV, Nagy AL (2004) Audit firm tenure and fraudulent financial reporting. Audit J Pract Theory 23(2): 55–69

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Catanach AH, Walker PL (1999) The international debate over mandatory auditor rotation: a conceptual research framework. J Int Account Audit Tax 8(1): 43–66

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chen C, Lin C, Lin Y (2008) Audit partner tenure, audit firm tenure, and discretionary accruals: Does long auditor tenure impair earnings quality?. Contemp Account Res 25(2): 415–445

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Chi W, Huang H, Liao Y, Xie H (2009) Mandatory audit–partner rotation, audit quality and market perception: evidence from Taiwan. Contemp Account Res 26(2): 359–391

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Commission on Auditors’ Responsibilities (The Cohen Commission) (1978) Report, conclusions, and recommendations. AICPA, New York

• DeAngelo LE (1981) Auditor independence low-balling and disclosure regulation. J Account Econ 3: 93–117

  Google Scholar 

• Dhaliwa D, Gleason C, Mills L (2004) Last-chance earnings management: using the tax expense to meet analysts’ forecasts. Contemp Account Res 21(2): 431–459

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dopuch N, King R, Schwartz R (2001) An experimental investigation of retention and rotation requirements. J Account Res 39(June):93–117

  Google Scholar 

• Farmer T, Rittenberg L, Trompeter G (1987) An investigation of the impact of economic and organization factors in auditor independence. Audit J Pract Theory 7(1): 1–14

  Google Scholar 

• Geiger MA, Raghunandan K (2002) Auditor tenure and audit reporting failures. Audit J Pract Theory 7(1): 1–14

  Google Scholar 

• Ghosh A, Moon D (2005) Auditor tenure and perceptions of audit quality. Account Rev 80(2): 585–612

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hillegeist SA (1999) Financial reporting and auditing under alternative damage apportionment rules. Account Rev 74(3): 347–369

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Imhoff EA (2003) Accounting quality, auditing, and corporate governance. Account Horizons 17(suppl):117–128

  Google Scholar 

• International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) (2003) Rebuilding public confidence in financial reporting. IFAC, New York

• Johnson VE, Khurana IK, Reynolds JK (2002) Audit–firm tenure and the quality of financial reports. Contemp Account Res 19(4): 637–660

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Klein A (2002) Audit committee, board of director characteristics, and earnings management. J Account Econ 33: 375–400

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee C, Gu Z (1998) Low balling, legal liability and auditor independence. Account Rev 73(4): 533–555

  Google Scholar 

• Louwers TJ (1998) The relation between going-concern opinions and auditors’ loss function. J Account Res 36: 143–156

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magee RP, Tseng M (1990) Audit pricing and independence. Account Rev 65(2): 315–336

  Google Scholar 

• Mansi S, Maxwell W, Mille D (2004) Does auditor quality and tenure matter to investors? Evidence from the bond market. J Account Res 42(Suppl):755–793

  Google Scholar 

• Myers J, Myers LA, Omer TC (2003) Exploring the term of auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings: A case for mandatory auditor rotation?. Account Rev 78(3): 779–799

  Article  Google Scholar 

• National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting (The Treadway Commission) (1987) Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

• Omer T, Bedard J, Falsetta D (2006) Auditor-provided tax services: the effects of a changing regulatory environment. Account Rev 81(5): 1095–1117

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Patterson E, Smith R (2003) Materiality uncertainty and earnings misstatement. Account Rev 78(3): 819–846

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Patterson E, Wright D (2003) Evidence of fraud, audit risk and audit liability regimes. Rev Account Stud 8(1): 105–131

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ruiz-Barbadillo E, Gómez-Aguilar N, Carrera N (2009) Does mandatory audit firm rotation enhance auditor independence? evidence from spain. Audit J Pract Theory 28(1): 113–135

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stanley JD, DeZoort FT (2007) Audit firm tenure and financial restatements: an analysis of industry specialization and fee effects. J Account Publ Policy 26(2): 131–159

  Article  Google Scholar 

• United States Code (2002) Sarbanes–Oxley act of 2002, pl 107–204, 116 stat 745. Codified in Sections 11, 15, 18, 28, and 29 USC

• US Government Accounting Office (2003) Public Accounting Firms: Required Study on the Potential Effects of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

Download references