Abstract
Excessive executive compensation is one of the prevailing topics in the business press. The “managerial power approach”, which is at the center of numerous publications of Bebchuk and Fried (Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2004) and Bebchuk and Grinstein (Oxford Rev Econ Policy 21:283–303, 2005), claims that chief executive officers (CEOs) corrupt the pay-setting process by influencing the board of directors. This paper analyzes the role of the board of directors in the pay-setting process for the CEO’s compensation schedule in an optimal contracting framework. The board’s role in our model is to provide information about the CEO’s ability to the shareholders. We assume that the CEO and other stakeholders, such as employees’ representatives, can influence the board to act in their respective favor when reporting to the shareholders. We show how the CEO’s influence on the board alters the optimal contract and the CEO’s incentives. Most interestingly, the influence of an interest group on the board can be the reason for high pay schedules, even though that was not the objective of the interest group.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams R, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J Finance 62: 217–250
Adams R, Ferreira D (2008) Do directors perform for pay?. J Account Econ 46: 154–171
Baiman S, Evans JH III, Noel J (1987) Optimal contracts with a utility-maximizing auditor. J Account Res 25: 217–244
Baiman S, Evans JH III, Nagarajan NJ (1991) Collusion in auditing. J Account Res 29: 1–18
Bebchuk L, Fried J (2004) Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Bebchuk L, Grinstein Y (2005) The growth of executive pay. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 21: 283–303
Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Q J Econ 116: 901–932
Brick IE, Palmon O, Wald JK (2006) CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism?. J Corp Finance 12: 403–423
Callaghan SR, Saly PJ, Subramaniam C (2004) The timing of option repricing. J Finance 59: 1651–1676
Chance DM, Kumar R, Todd RB (2000) The “repricing” of executive stock options. J Financ Econ 57: 129–154
Committee on Corporate Laws (2004) Corporate director’s guidebook. American Bar Association, Chicago
Core JE, Holthausen RW, Larcker DF (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. J Financ Econ 51: 371–406
Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26: 301–325
Göx R (1998) Erfolgsabhängige Gehälter, Belohnung für den Zufall und der Einfluss des Managements auf die Gestaltung seines eigenen Vergütungssystems. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Sonderheft 51: 27–55
Hall BJ, Liebman JB (1998) Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?. Q J Econ 113: 653–691
Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Am Econ Rev 88: 96–118
Holmstrom B (2005) Pay without performance and the managerial power hypothesis: a comment. J Corp Law 30: 703–715
Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J Political Econ 98: 225–264
Khalil F, Lawarrée J (2006) Incentives for corruptible auditors in the absence of commitment. J Ind Econ 54: 269–291
Kofman F, Lawarrée J (1993) Collusion in hierarchical agency. Econometrica 61: 629–656
Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture. Q J Econ 106: 1089–1127
Lambert RA, Larcker DA, Weigelt K (1993) The structure of organizational incentives. Adm Sci Q 38: 438–461
Laux V (2008) Board independence and CEO turnover. J Account Res 46: 137–171
Laux C, Laux V (2009) Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. Account Rev 84: 869–891
Murphy KJ (2003) Executive compensation. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2485–2563
Myerson RB (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47: 61–73
Rapp MS, Wolff M (2009) Vergütung deutscher Vorstandsorgane 2009. Fachverlag der Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt GmbH, Düsseldorf
Shivdasani A, Yermack D (1999) CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: an empirical analysis. J Finance 54: 1829–1853
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Döscher, T., Friedl, G. Corporate governance, stakeholder power, and executive compensation. OR Spectrum 33, 309–331 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-010-0218-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-010-0218-z