[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Corporate governance, stakeholder power, and executive compensation

  • Regular Article
  • Published:
OR Spectrum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excessive executive compensation is one of the prevailing topics in the business press. The “managerial power approach”, which is at the center of numerous publications of Bebchuk and Fried (Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 2004) and Bebchuk and Grinstein (Oxford Rev Econ Policy 21:283–303, 2005), claims that chief executive officers (CEOs) corrupt the pay-setting process by influencing the board of directors. This paper analyzes the role of the board of directors in the pay-setting process for the CEO’s compensation schedule in an optimal contracting framework. The board’s role in our model is to provide information about the CEO’s ability to the shareholders. We assume that the CEO and other stakeholders, such as employees’ representatives, can influence the board to act in their respective favor when reporting to the shareholders. We show how the CEO’s influence on the board alters the optimal contract and the CEO’s incentives. Most interestingly, the influence of an interest group on the board can be the reason for high pay schedules, even though that was not the objective of the interest group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams R, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly boards. J Finance 62: 217–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams R, Ferreira D (2008) Do directors perform for pay?. J Account Econ 46: 154–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman S, Evans JH III, Noel J (1987) Optimal contracts with a utility-maximizing auditor. J Account Res 25: 217–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baiman S, Evans JH III, Nagarajan NJ (1991) Collusion in auditing. J Account Res 29: 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Fried J (2004) Pay without performance: the unfulfilled promise of executive compensation. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebchuk L, Grinstein Y (2005) The growth of executive pay. Oxford Rev Econ Policy 21: 283–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2001) Are CEOs rewarded for luck? The ones without principals are. Q J Econ 116: 901–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brick IE, Palmon O, Wald JK (2006) CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism?. J Corp Finance 12: 403–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan SR, Saly PJ, Subramaniam C (2004) The timing of option repricing. J Finance 59: 1651–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chance DM, Kumar R, Todd RB (2000) The “repricing” of executive stock options. J Financ Econ 57: 129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Corporate Laws (2004) Corporate director’s guidebook. American Bar Association, Chicago

  • Core JE, Holthausen RW, Larcker DF (1999) Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. J Financ Econ 51: 371–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Jensen MC (1983) Separation of ownership and control. J Law Econ 26: 301–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Göx R (1998) Erfolgsabhängige Gehälter, Belohnung für den Zufall und der Einfluss des Managements auf die Gestaltung seines eigenen Vergütungssystems. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung Sonderheft 51: 27–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BJ, Liebman JB (1998) Are CEOs really paid like bureaucrats?. Q J Econ 113: 653–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1998) Endogenously chosen boards of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Am Econ Rev 88: 96–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom B (2005) Pay without performance and the managerial power hypothesis: a comment. J Corp Law 30: 703–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J Political Econ 98: 225–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khalil F, Lawarrée J (2006) Incentives for corruptible auditors in the absence of commitment. J Ind Econ 54: 269–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kofman F, Lawarrée J (1993) Collusion in hierarchical agency. Econometrica 61: 629–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laffont J-J, Tirole J (1991) The politics of government decision-making: a theory of regulatory capture. Q J Econ 106: 1089–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert RA, Larcker DA, Weigelt K (1993) The structure of organizational incentives. Adm Sci Q 38: 438–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laux V (2008) Board independence and CEO turnover. J Account Res 46: 137–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laux C, Laux V (2009) Board committees, CEO compensation, and earnings management. Account Rev 84: 869–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy KJ (2003) Executive compensation. In: Ashenfelter O, Card D (eds) Handbook of labor economics, vol 3. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 2485–2563

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson RB (1979) Incentive compatibility and the bargaining problem. Econometrica 47: 61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp MS, Wolff M (2009) Vergütung deutscher Vorstandsorgane 2009. Fachverlag der Verlagsgruppe Handelsblatt GmbH, Düsseldorf

  • Shivdasani A, Yermack D (1999) CEO involvement in the selection of new board members: an empirical analysis. J Finance 54: 1829–1853

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thorsten Döscher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Döscher, T., Friedl, G. Corporate governance, stakeholder power, and executive compensation. OR Spectrum 33, 309–331 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-010-0218-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00291-010-0218-z

Keywords

Navigation