[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Induction of SA-signaling pathway and ethylene biosynthesis in Trichoderma harzianum-treated tomato plants after infection of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Key message

Salicylic acid-signaling pathway and ethylene biosynthesis were induced in tomato treated with Trichoderma harzianum when infected by root-knot nematodes and limited the infection by activation of SAR and ethylene production.

Abstract

Soil pre-treatment with Trichoderma harzianum (Th) strains ITEM 908 (T908) and T908-5 decreased susceptibility of tomato to Meloidogyne incognita, as assessed by restriction in nematode reproduction and development. The effect of T. harzianum treatments on plant defense was detected by monitoring the expression of the genes PR-1/PR-5 and JERF3/ACO, markers of the SA- and JA/ET-dependent signaling pathways, respectively. The compatible nematode–plant interaction in absence of fungi caused a marked suppression of PR-1, PR-5, and ACO gene expressions, either locally or systemically, whilst expression of JERF3 gene resulted unaffected. Conversely, when plants were pre-treated with Th-strains, over-expression of PR-1, PR-5, and ACO genes was observed in roots 5 days after nematode inoculation. JERF3 gene expression did not change in Th-colonized plants challenged with nematodes. In the absence of nematodes, Trichoderma-root interaction was characterized by the inhibition of both SA-dependent signaling pathway and ET biosynthesis, and, in the case of PR-1 and ACO genes, this inhibition was systemic. JERF3 gene expression was systemically restricted only at the very early stages of plant–fungi interaction. Data presented indicate that Th-colonization primed roots for Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) against root-knot nematodes and reacted to nematode infection more efficiently than untreated plants. Such a response probably involves also activation of ET production, through an augmented transcription of the ACO gene, which encodes for the enzyme catalyzing the last step of ET biosynthesis. JA signaling and Induced Systemic Resistance (ISR) do not seem to be involved in the biocontrol action of the tested Th-strains against RKNs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfano G, Ivey MLL, Cakir C, Bos JIB, Miller SA, Madden LV, Kamoun S, Hoitink HAJ (2007) Systemic modulation of gene expression in tomato by Trichoderma hamatum 382. Phytopathology 97:429–437

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bekal S, Niblack TL, Lambert KNA (2003) A chorismate mutase from the soybean cyst nematode Heteroderaglycines shows polymorphisms that correlate with virulence. Mol Plant Microbe In 16:439–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Derksen H, Rampitsch C, Daayf F (2013) Signaling cross-talk in plant disease resistance. Plant Sci 207:79–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Druzhinina IS, Seidl-Seiboth V, Herrera-Estrella A, Horwitz BA, Kennerley CM, Monte E, Mukherjee P K, Zeilinger S, Grigoriev IV, Kubicek CP (2011) Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nature Rev 9:749–759

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Durrant WE, Dong X (2004) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 42:85–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudali SL, Wang C, Williamson VM (2013) Ethylene signaling pathway modulates attractiveness of host roots to the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne hapla. Mol Plant Microbe In 26:75–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glazebrook J (2005) Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 43:205–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graeme-Cook KA, Faull JL (1991) Effect of ultraviolet-induced mutants of Trichoderma harzianum with altered antibiotic production on selected pathogens in vitro. Can J Microbiol 37:659–664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harman GE, Howell CR, Viterbo A, Chet I, Lorito M (2004) Trichoderma species—opportunistic avirulent plant symbionts. Nat Rev Microbiol 2:43–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hermosa R, Viterbo A, Chet I, Monte E (2012) Plant beneficial effects of Trichoderma and of its genes. Microbiology 158:17–25

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kabaluk T, Gazdik K (2005) Directory of microbial pesticides for agricultural crops in OECD Countries. Revised September 2005. Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, 1–242

  • Kim YS, Choi D, Lee MM, Lee SH, Kim WT (1998) Biotic and abiotic stress-related expression of ACO gene family in Nicotiana glutinosa. Plant Cell Physiol 39:565–573

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leonetti P, Costanza A, Zonno M, Molinari S, Altomare C (2014) How fungi interact with nematode to activate the plant defence response in tomato plants. Agric Appl Biol Sci 79(3):357–363

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li R, Rashotte AM, Singh NK, Lawrence KS, Weaver DB, Locy RD (2014) Integrated signaling networks in plant response to sedentary endoparasitic nematodes: a perspective. Plant Cell Rep 46(4):365–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real time quantitative PCR and the 2−∆∆CT method. Methods 25:402–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marzano M, Gallo A, Altomare C (2013) Improvement of biocontrol efficacy of Trichoderma harzianum vs. Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici through UV-induced tolerance to fusaric acid. Biol Control 67:397–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mathys J, De Cremer K, Timmermans P, Van Kerckhove S, Lievens B, Vanhaecke M, Cammue BPA, De Coninck B (2012) Genome-wide characterization of ISR induced in Arabidopsis thaliana by Trichoderma hamatumT-382 against Botrytis cinerea infection. Front Plant Sci 3:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S (2009) Bioassays on plant-nematode interactions. In: Narwal SS, Sampietro DA, Catalàn CAN, Vattuone MA, Politycka B (eds) Plant Bioassays. Science Publisher, Enfield, pp 293–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S (2011) Natural genetic and induced plant resistance, as a control strategy to plant-parasitic nematodes alternative to pesticides. Plant Cell Rep 30:311–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S (2015) Immune responses induced by salicylic and jasmonic acids against plant parasites. In: Santos P (ed) Salicylic acid and jasmonic acid: biosynthesis, functions and role in plant development. Nova Science Publishers Inc., New York, pp 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S (2016) Systemic acquired resistance activation in solanaceous crops as a management strategy against root-knot nematodes. Pest Manag Sci 72:888–896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S, Abd-Elgawad MM (2007) Catalase inhibition as a biochemical marker of resistance to root-knot nematodes in tomato. Nematol medit 35:237–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Molinari S, Fanelli E, Leonetti P (2014) Expression of tomato salicylic acid (SA)-responsive pathogenesis-related genes in Mi-1-mediated and SA-induced resistance to root-knot nematodes. Mol Plant Pathol 15:255–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nawrocka J, Małolepsa U (2013) Diversity in plant resistance induced by Trichoderma. Biol Control 67:14–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portillo M, Cabrera J, Lindsey K, Topping J et al (2013) Distinct and conserved transcriptomic changes during nematode-induced giant cell development in tomato compared with Arabidopsis: a functional role for gene repression. New Phytol 197:1276–1290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pozo MJ, Azcón-Aguilar C (2007) Unravelling mycorrhiza-induced resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:393–398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Selim ME, Mahdy ME, Sorial ME, Dababat AA, Sikora RA (2014) Biological and chemical dependent systemic resistance and their significance for the control of root-knot nematodes. Nematology 16:917–927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon E, Bar-Eyal M, Chet I, Herrera-Estrella A, Kleifeld, Spiegel Y (2001) Biological control of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica by Trichoderma harzianum. Phytopathology 91:687–693

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon E, Chet I, Viterbo A, Bar-Eyal M, Nagan H, Samuels GJ, Spiegel Y (2007) Parasitism of Trichoderma on Meloidogyne javanica and role of the gelatinous matrix. Eur J Plant Pathol 118:247–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharon E, Chet I, Bar-Eyal M (2009) Biocontrol of root-knot nematodes by Trichoderma—modes of action. Proc. IOBC Meeting on Multitrophic Interactions in Soil, Dijon, France, IOBC/WPRS Bulletin 42:159–163

  • Shoresh M, Yedidia I, Chet I (2005) Involvement of jasmonic acid/ethylene signaling pathway in the systemic resistance induced in cucumber by Trichoderma asperellum T203. Phytopathology 95:76–84

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shoresh M, Harman GE, Mastouri F (2010) Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annu Rev Phytopathol 48:21–43

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sticher L, Mauch-Mani B, Métraux JP (1997) Systemic acquired resistance. Annu Rev Phytopathol 35:235–270

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling GR (2011) Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: an ecological perspective, a review of progress and opportunities for further research. In Davies K, Spiegel Y (eds) Biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: building coherence between microbial ecology and molecular mechanisms. Progress in biological control 11, Springer Science + Business Media B.V., 1–38

  • Szabó M, Csepregi K, Gálber M, Virányi F, Fekete C (2012) Control plant-parasitic nematodes with Trichoderma species and nematode-trapping fungi: The role of chi18-5 and chi18-12 genes in nematode egg-parasitism. Biol Control 63:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ton J, Van Pelt JA, Van Loon LC, Pieterse CMJ (2002). Differential effectiveness of salicylate-dependent and jasmonate/ethylene-dependent induced resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol Plant Microbe In 15:27–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trudgill DL, Blok VC (2001) Apomictic, polyphagous root-knot nematodes: exceptionally successful and damaging biotrophic root pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:53–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uehara T, Sugiyama S, Matsura H, Arie T, Masuta C (2010) Resistant and susceptible responses in tomato to cyst nematode are differentially regulated by salicylic acid. Plant Cell Physiol 51:1524–1536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Loon LC, Bakker PAHM, Pieterse CMJ (1998) Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 36:453–483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Huang Z, Chen Q, Zhang Z, Zhang H, Wu Y, Huang D, Huang R (2004) Ectopic overexpression of tomato JERF3 in tobacco activates downstream gene expression and enhances salt tolerance. Plant Mol Biol 55:183–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woo SL, Ruocco M, Vinale F, Nigro M, Marra R, Lombardi N, Pascale A, Lanzuise S, Manganiello G, Lorito M (2014) Trichoderma-based products and their widespread use in agriculture. Open Mycol J 8:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan C, Xie D (2015) Jasmonate in plant defence: sentinel or double agent? Plant Biotech J 13:1233–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshioka Y, Ichikawa H, Naznin HA, Kogure A, Hyakumachi M (2011) Systemic resistance induced in Arabidopsis thaliana by Trichoderma asperellum SKT-1, a microbial pesticide of seedborne diseases of rice. Pest Manag Sci 68:60–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work of P. Leonetti and S. Molinari was carried out within the sub-project OR3 SOS-POM of the project CISIA, funded by the National Research Council (CNR) of Italy.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Sustainable Plant Protection (IPSP), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 70126, Bari, Italy

    Paola Leonetti & Sergio Molinari

  2. Institute of Sciences of Food Production (ISPA), National Research Council of Italy (CNR), 70126, Bari, Italy

    Maria Chiara Zonno & Claudio Altomare

Authors
  1. Paola Leonetti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Maria Chiara Zonno
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sergio Molinari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Claudio Altomare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Leonetti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Kathryn K. Kamo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Leonetti, P., Zonno, M.C., Molinari, S. et al. Induction of SA-signaling pathway and ethylene biosynthesis in Trichoderma harzianum-treated tomato plants after infection of the root-knot nematode Meloidogyne incognita . Plant Cell Rep 36, 621–631 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-017-2109-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation