[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Grapevine cv. ‘Riesling’ water use in the northeastern United States

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vine water use was measured in a Vitis vinifera cv. Riesling vineyard located in New York. Vines were fully irrigated and were trained via vertical shoot positioning giving a narrow curtain intercepting about 30% of the incident light during the sunlight hours. Vine water use was estimated on six vines by sap flow gauges directly calibrated with whole canopy transpiration measurements. The regression analysis between estimates of transpiration showed that there were large differences between vines in the calibration values obtained. Sap flow monitoring started late in June, about 2 weeks after bloom, when the canopy already filled the trellis system, and continued until October. Results showed that vine water use during most of the summer days was between 1.0 and 2.0 mm day−1, with peak values around 2.5 mm. The basal (e.g. vine transpiration/reference evapotranspiration) crop coefficient (K cb) varied somewhat between days, but it was quite stable during the whole season. Averaged over the entire experimental period, the K cb was 0.49. Some of the day-to-day variation in the K cb was negatively related with daily average air vapour pressure deficit. This suggests that reference evapotranspiration models on grass may not be fully accurate for vines under these experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO irrigation and drainage paper No. 56. Rome, pp 15–27

  • Annandale JG, Stockle CO (1994) Fluctuation of crop evapotranspiration coefficients with weather. A sensitivity analysis. Irrigat Sci 15:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker P, Edwards WRN (1999) Corrected heat capacity of wood for sap flow calculations. Tree Physiol 19:767–768

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhofer C (1992) Estimating forest evapotranspiration at a non-ideal site. Agric Meteorol 60:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun P, Schmid J (1999) Sap flow measurements in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) 1. Stem morphology and use of the heat balance method. Plant Soil 215:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Harley PC, Tenhunen JD, Lange OL (1987) Gas exchange studies in two Portuguese grapevine cultivars. Physiol Plant 70:639–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen Y, Fuchs M, Green GC (1981) Improvement of the heat pulse method for determining sap flow in trees. Plant Cell Environ 4:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corelli L, Magnanini E (1993) A whole-tree sytem for gas exchange studies. HortSci 28:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloire A, Carbonneau A, Wang ZP, Ojeda H (2004) Vine and water a short review. J Int Sci Vigne Vin 38:1–13

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni D, Lakso AN, Piccioni RM (2005) Transpiration of apple trees in a humid climate using heat pulse sap flow gauges calibrated with whole-canopy gas exchange chambers. Agric Meteor 130:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragoni D, Lakso AN, Piccioni RM, Tarara J (2006) Transpiration of grapevines in the humid northeastern United States. Am J Enol Vitic 57:460–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Düring H (1987) Stomatal responses to alterations of soil and air humidity in grapevines. Vitis 26:9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans RG, Spayd RL, Wample MW, Kroeger MW, Mahan MO (1993) Water use of Vitis vinifera grapes in Washington. Agric Water Manag 23:109–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez JE, Duran PJ, Palomo MJ, Diaz-Espejo A, Chamorro V, Giron IF (2006) Calibration of sap flow estimated by the compensation heat pulse method in olive, plum and orange trees: relationships with xylem anatomy. Tree Physiol 26:719–728

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • González-Altozano P, Pavel EW, Oncins JA, Doltra J, Cohen M, Paço T, Massai R, Castel JR (2008) Comparative assessment of five methods of determining sap flow in peach trees. Agric Wat Manag 95:503–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green SR (2008) Measurement and modelling the transpiration of fruit trees and grapevines for irrigation scheduling. Acta Hort 792:321–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Green S, Clothier B (1988) Water use of kiwifruit vines and apple trees by the heat pulse technique. J Exp Bot 39:115–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green S, Clothier B, Jardine B (2003) Theory and practical application of heat pulse to measure sap flow. Agron J 95:1371–1379

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardie WJ, Considine JA (1976) Response of grapes to water deficit stress in particular stages of development. Am J Enol Vitic 27:55–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Leather DJ, Grundstein AJ, Ellis AW (2000) Growing season moisture deficits across the northeastern United States. Clim Res 14:43–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaei JH, Reynolds AG (2006) Delineation of within-site terroir effects using soil and vine water measurement. Investigation of Cabernet Franc. Can J Plant Sci 86:1436

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda G, Kliewer WM (1986) Stomatal response to three grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.) to high temperature. Am J Enol Vitic 37:44–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Soar CJ, Speirs J, Maffei SM, Penrose AB, McCarthy MG, Lovey BR (2006) Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Austr J Grape Wine Res 12:2–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Ayars JE (2005) Grapevine water use and the crop coefficient are linear functions of the shaded area measured beneath the canopy. Agric Meteor 135:201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Baeza P (2007) Relationships among ambient temperature and vapour pressure deficit and leaf and stem water potentials of fully irrigated, field-grown grapevines. Am J Enol Vitic 58:173–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Matthews MA (1990) Grapevine. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops agronomy monograph no. 30. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, pp 1019–1055

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Phene CJ, Grimes DW, Trout TJ (2003) Water use of mature Thompson seedless grapevines in California. Irrigat Sci 22:11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright JL (1982) New evapotranspiration crop coefficients. J. Irrig. Drain. Div Proc of the ASCE 108. No. IR1:57–74

  • Wünsche JN, Lakso AN, Robinson TL (1995) Comparison of four methods for estimating total light interception by apple trees of varying form. HortSci 30:272–276

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

D. S. Intrigliolo was supported by a research fellowship from the Co-operative Research Programme of the OECD. We are grateful to M. Rose and B. Riccardi (NYSAES-Cornell University), for help in field determinations, Dr. S. Green, for help with the sap flow equipment, and Dr. B. Seem for loan of the meteorological equipment. The critical reading of the manuscript by Dr. L. Testi (IAS-CSIC) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. S. Intrigliolo.

Additional information

Communicated by S. Ortega-Farias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Intrigliolo, D.S., Lakso, A.N. & Piccioni, R.M. Grapevine cv. ‘Riesling’ water use in the northeastern United States. Irrig Sci 27, 253–262 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0140-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0140-1

Keywords

Navigation