Abstract
More than 12 studies of different bottlenose dolphin populations, spanning from tropical to cold temperate waters, have shown that the species typically lives in societies in which relationships among individuals are predominantly fluid. In all cases dolphins lived in small groups characterised by fluid and dynamic interactions and some degree of dispersal from the natal group by both sexes. We describe a small, closed population of bottlenose dolphins living at the southern extreme of the species' range. Individuals live in large, mixed-sex groups in which no permanent emigration/immigration has been observed over the past 7 years. All members within the community are relatively closely associated (average half-weight index>0.4). Both male–male and female–female networks of preferred associates are present, as are long-lasting associations across sexes. The community structure is temporally stable, compared to other bottlenose dolphin populations, and constant companionship seems to be prevalent in the temporal association pattern. Such high degrees of stability are unprecedented in studies of bottlenose dolphins and may be related to the ecological constraints of Doubtful Sound. Fjords are low-productivity systems in which survival may easily require a greater level of co-operation, and hence group stability. These conditions are also present in other cetacean populations forming stable groups. We therefore hypothesise that ecological constraints are important factors shaping social interactions within cetacean societies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allchin D (1992) Stimulation and analysis of information-center foraging. Behaviour 122:288–305
Amos B, Schloetterer C, Tautz D (1993) Social structure of pilot whales revealed by analytical DNA profiling. Science 260:670–672
Baird RW, Whitehead H (2000) Social organisation of mammal-eating killer whales: group stability and dispersal patterns. Can J Zool 78:2096–2105
Ballance LT (1990) Residence patterns, group organisation, and surfacing associations of bottlenose dolphins in Kino Bay, Gulf of California, Mexico. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Academic, San Diego
Barta Z, Giraldeau LA (2001) Breeding colonies as information centers: a reappraisal of information-based hypotheses using the producer-scrounger game. Behav Ecol 12:121–127
Barta Z, Szep T (1995) Frequency-dependent selection on information-transfer strategies at breeding colonies: a simulation study. Behav Ecol 6:308–310
Bearzi G, Notarbartolo-di-Sciara G, Politi E (1997) Social ecology of bottlenose dolphins in the Kvarneri (Northern Adriatic Sea). Mar Mamm Sci 13:650–668
Bejder BL, Fletcher D, Bräger S (1998) A method of testing association patterns of social animals. Anim Behav 56:719–725
Bigg MA, Olesiuk PF, Ellis GM (1990) Social organisation and genealogy of resident killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the coastal waters of British Columbia and Washington State. Rep Int Whal Comm Spec Issue 12:383–405
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (1977) Social organisation and foraging in emballonurid bats. III. Mating systems. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:1–17
Bräger S, Würsig B, Acevedo A, Henningsen T (1994) Association patterns of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Galveston Bay, Texas. J Mammal 75:431–437
Buckley NJ (1997) Spatial-concentration effects and the importance of local enhancement in the evolution of colonial breeding in seabirds. Am Nat 149:1091–1112
Cairns JS, Schwager SJ (1987) A comparison of association indices. Anim Behav 35:1454–1469
Chilvers BL, Corkeron PJ (2002) Association patterns of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiops aduncus, off Point Lookout, Queensland, Australia. Can J Zool 80:973–979
Christal J, Whitehead H (2001) Social affiliations within sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) groups. Ethology 107:323–340
Connor RC, Smolker RA, Richards AF (1992) Dolphin alliances and coalitions. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 415–443
Connor RC, Wells RS, Mann J, Read AJ (2000) The bottlenose dolphin: social relationships in a fission–fusion society. In: Mann J, Connor RC, Tyack PL, Whitehead H (eds) Cetacean societies. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 91–126
Corkeron PJ (1990) Aspects of the behavioral ecology of inshore dolphins Tursiops truncatus and Sousa chinensis in Moreton Bay, Australia. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin, Academic, San Diego
Crowley PH (2001) Dangerous games and the emergence of social structure: evolving memory-based strategies for the generalized hawk-dove game. Behav Ecol 12:753–760
Datta SB (1992) Effects of availability of allies on female dominance structure. In: Harcourt AH, de Waal FBM (eds) Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 61–82
dos Santos ME, Lacerda M (1987) Preliminary observations of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the Sado Estuary (Portugal). Aquat Mamm 13:65–80
Dufault S, Whitehead H (1995) An assessment of changes with time in the marking patterns used for photoidentification of individual sperm whales, Physeter macrocephalus. Mar Mamm Sci 11:335–343
Efron B, Stein C (1981) The jackknife estimate of variance. Ann Stat 9:586–596
Félix F (1994) Ecology of the coastal bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus in the Gulf of Guayaquil, Ecuador. Invest Cetacea 25:235–256
Gibbs MT, Bowman MJ, Dietrich DE (2001) Maintenance of near-surface stratification in Doubtful Sound, a New Zealand Fjord. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 51:683–704
Gowans S, Whitehead H, Hooker SK (2001) Social organisation in northern bottlenose whales, Hyperoodon ampullatus: not driven by deep-water foraging. Anim Behav 62:369–377
Haase PA, Schneider K (2001) Birth demographics of bottlenose dolphins, Tursiopstruncatus, in Doubtful Sound, Fiordland, New Zealand—preliminary findings. NZ J Mar Freshw Res 35:675–680.
Hansen LJ (1990) California coastal bottlenose dolphins. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Academic, San Diego
Manly BFJ (1995) A note on the analysis of species co-occurrences. Ecology 76:1109–1115
Matthews JBL, Heimdal BR (1979) Pelagic productivity and food chains in fjord systems. In: Freeland HJ, Farmer DM, Levings CD (eds) Fjord oceanography. NATO Conference Series 4(4). Plenum, New York, pp 377–398
Perrin N, Lehmann L (2001) Is sociality driven by the costs of dispersal or the benefits of philopatry? A role for kin-discrimination mechanisms. Am Nat 158:471–483
Perrin N, Mazalov V (1999) Dispersal and inbreeding avoidance. Am Nat 154:282–292
Quintana-Rizzo E, Wells RS (2001) Resighting and association patterns of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Cedar Keys, Florida: insights into social organization. Can J Zool 79:447–456
Rossbach KA, Herzing DL (1997) Underwater observations of feeding bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) near Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas. Mar Mamm Sci 13:498–503
Schneider K (1999) Behaviour and ecology of bottlenose dolphins in Doubtful Sound, Fiordland, New Zealand. PhD thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
Shane SH (1990) Behavior and ecology of the bottlenose dolphin at Sanibel Island, Florida. In: Leatherwood S, Reeves RR (eds) The bottlenose dolphin. Academic, San Diego
Smolker RA, Richards AF, Connor RC, Pepper JW (1992) Sex differences in patterns of association among Indian Ocean bottlenose dolphins. Behaviour 123:38–69
Stanton BR, Pickard GL (1981) Physical oceanography of the New Zealand fiords. N Z Oceanogr Inst Mem
Trivers RL (1972) Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B (ed) Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago, pp 1871–1971
Wells RS (1991) The role of long-term study in understanding the social structure of a bottlenose dolphin community. In: Pryor K, Norris KS (eds) Dolphin societies: discoveries and puzzles. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 199–225
Wells RS, Scott MD, Irvine AB (1987) The social structure of free ranging bottlenose dolphins. In: Genoways HH (ed) Current mammalogy, vol 1. Plenum, New York, pp 247–305
White FJ (1992) Pygmy chimpanzee social organisation: variation with party size and between study sites. Am J Primatol 26:203–214
Whitehead H (1990) Assessing sperm whale populations using natural markings: recent progress. Rep Int Whal Comm Spec Issue 12:377–382
Whitehead H (1995) Investigating structure and temporal scale in social organisations using identified individuals. Behav Ecol 6:199–208
Whitehead H (1999a) SOCPROG 1.3, program for analyzing social structure (8 May 2001)
Whitehead H (1999b) Testing association patterns of social animals. Anim Behav 57: F26-F29
Whitehead H, Arnbom T (1987) Social organisation of sperm whales off the Galápagos Islands, February–April 1985. Can J Zool 65:913–919
Whitehead H, Dufault S (1999) Techniques for analysing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: review and recommendations. Adv Stud Behav 28:33–74
Williams JA, Dawson SM, Slooten E (1993) The abundance and distribution of bottlenosed dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in Doubtful Sound, New Zealand. Can J Zool 71:2080–2088
Wilson DRB (1995) The ecology of bottlenose dolphins in the Moray Firth, Scotland: a population at the northern extreme of the species' range. PhD thesis, Aberdeen University, Aberdeen, Scotland
Wrangham RW (1980) Female choice of least costly males: a possible factor in the evolution of leks. Z Tierpsychol 54:357–367
Wrangham RW, Rubenstein DI (1986) Social evolution in birds and mammals. In: Rubenstein DI, Wrangham RW (eds) Ecological aspects of social evolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Würsig B, Würsig M (1977) The photographic determination of group size, composition and stability of coastal porpoises (Tursiops truncatus). Science 198:755–756
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank David Watts, Peter Corkeron, Richard C. Connor, Christoph Richter, Susan M. Lusseau and three anonymous referees who provided valuable comments and critiques at various stages of this study. We are indebted to Hal Whitehead for the development of his program SOCPROG, which eased the analysis of individual association data. This long-term study would not have been possible without the support of many institutions and companies. We would like to thank Fiordland Travel Ltd., Natural History New Zealand Limited, Geissendoerfer Film- und Fernsehgesellschaft, New Zealand Department of Conservation, the New Zealand Whale and Dolphin Trust, the University of Otago and the University of Otago Bridging Grant scheme for their financial and technical support. We would also like to thank Frank Wells, Paul Norris and Paul Stewart for their continuous help and moral support in the field. Maps from Fig. 1 were created using GMT from KK+W digital cartography (http://www.aquarius.geomar.de).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by D. Watts
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lusseau, D., Schneider, K., Boisseau, O.J. et al. The bottlenose dolphin community of Doubtful Sound features a large proportion of long-lasting associations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54, 396–405 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-003-0651-y