[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The Microbiomes in Lichen and Moss Biocrust Contribute Differently to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles in Arid Ecosystems

  • Soil Microbiology
  • Published:
Microbial Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Biological soil crusts (biocrusts) are distributed in arid and semiarid regions across the globe. Microorganisms are an essential component in biocrusts. They add and accelerate critical biochemical processes. However, little is known about the functional genes and metabolic processes of microbiomes in lichen and moss biocrust. This study used shotgun metagenomic sequencing to compare the microbiomes of lichen-dominated and moss-dominated biocrust and reveal the microbial genes and metabolic pathways involved in carbon and nitrogen cycling. The results showed that Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Acidobacteria were more abundant in moss biocrust than lichen biocrust, while Proteobacteria and Cyanobacteria were more abundant in lichen biocrust than moss biocrust. The relative abundance of carbohydrate-active enzymes and enzymes associated with carbon and nitrogen metabolism differed significantly between microbiomes of the two biocrust types. However, in the microbial communities of both biocrust types, respiration pathways dominated over carbon fixation pathways. The genes encoding carbon monoxide dehydrogenase were more abundant than those encoding ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (RuBisCo) involved in carbon fixation. Similarly, metabolic N-pathway diversity was dominated by nitrogen reduction, followed by denitrification, with nitrogen fixation the lowest proportion. Gene diversity involved in N cycling differed between the microbiomes of the two biocrust types. Assimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in lichen biocrust, whereas dissimilatory nitrate reduction genes had higher relative abundance in moss biocrust. As dissolved organic carbon and soil organic carbon are considered the main drivers of the community structure in the microbiome of biocrust, these results indicate that biocrust type has a pivotal role in microbial diversity and related biogeochemical cycling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data is publicly available on the SRA database under BioProject PRJNA793166.

References

  1. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Board (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  2. Belnap J, Lange OL (2003) Biological soil crusts: structure, function, and management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Eldridge D (2000) Ecology and management of biological soil crusts: recent developments and future challenges. Bryologist 103:742–747. https://doi.org/10.1639/0007-2745(2000)103[0742:Eamobs]2.0.Co;2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lan S, Wu L, Zhang D, Hu C (2012) Successional stages of biological soil crusts and their microstructure variability in Shapotou region (China). Environ Earth Sci 65:77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1066-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lan S, Wu L, Zhang D, Hu C (2013) Assessing level of development and successional stages in biological soil crusts with biological indicators. Microb Ecol 66:394–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-013-0191-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maestre FT, Salguero-Gomez R, Quero JL (2012) It is getting hotter in here: determining and projecting the impacts of global environmental change on drylands introduction. Philos T R Soc B 367:3062–3075. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Weber B, Wu D, Tamm A, Ruckteschler N, Rodriguez-Caballero E, Steinkamp J, Meusel H, Elbert W, Behrendt T, Soergel M, Cheng Y, Crutzen PJ, Su H, Poeschi U (2015) Biological soil crusts accelerate the nitrogen cycle through large NO and HONO emissions in drylands. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112:15384–15389. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1515818112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fierer N, Leff JW, Adams BJ, Nielsen UN, Bates ST, Lauber CL, Owens S, Gilbert JA, Wall DH, Caporaso JG (2012) Cross-biome metagenomic analyses of soil microbial communities and their functional attributes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 109:21390–21395. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1215210110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Comeau AM, Douglas GM, Langille MGI (2017) Microbiome helper: a custom and streamlined workflow for microbiome research. Msystems 2:e00127-00116. https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00127-16

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Elbert W, Weber B, Burrows S, Steinkamp J, Buedel B, Andreae MO, Poeschl U (2012) Contribution of cryptogamic covers to the global cycles of carbon and nitrogen. Nat Geosci 5:459–462. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1486

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao M, Heinsch FA, Nemani RR, Running SW (2005) Improvements of the MODIS terrestrial gross and net primary production global data set. Remote Sens Environ 95:164–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.12.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Canfield DE, Glazer AN, Falkowski PG (2010) The evolution and future of Earth’s nitrogen cycle. Science 330:192–196. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186120

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Galloway JN, Dentener FJ, Capone DG, Boyer EW, Howarth RW, Seitzinger SP, Asner GP, Cleveland CC, Green PA, Holland EA, Karl DM, Michaels AF, Porter JH, Townsend AR, Vorosmarty CJ (2004) Nitrogen cycles: past, present and future. Biogeochemistry 70:153–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-004-0370-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Castillo-Monroy AP, Maestre FT, Rey A, Soliveres S, Garcia-Palacios P (2011) Biological soil crust microsites are the main contributor to soil respiration in a semiarid ecosystem. Ecosystems 14:835–847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-011-9449-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Darby BJ, Neher DA, Belnap J (2010) Impact of biological soil crusts and desert plants on soil microfaunal community composition. Plant Soil 328:421–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-009-0122-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuske CR, Yeager CM, Johnson S, Ticknor LO, Belnap J (2012) Response and resilience of soil biocrust bacterial communities to chronic physical disturbance in arid shrublands. Isme J 6:886–897. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Housman DC, Powers HH, Collins AD, Belnap J (2006) Carbon and nitrogen fixation differ between successional stages of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau and Chihuahuan Desert. J Arid Environ 66:620–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2005.11.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Li XR, Zhang P, Su YG, Jia RL (2012) Carbon fixation by biological soil crusts following revegetation of sand dunes in arid desert regions of China: a four-year field study. CATENA 97:119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2012.05.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Su YG, Zhao X, Li AX, Li XR, Huang G (2011) Nitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts from the Tengger desert, northern China. Eur J Soil Biol 47:182–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2011.04.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang IG, Zhao YG, Xu MX, Yang LN, Ming J (2013) Effects of biological soil crust at different succession stages in hilly region of Loess Plateau on soil CO2 flux. Chinese J Appl Eco 24:659–666. https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.2013.0208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu LC, Liu YB, Zhang P, Song G, Hui R, Wang ZR, Wang J (2017) Development of bacterial communities in biological soil crusts along a revegetation chronosequence in the Tengger Desert, northwest China. Biogeosciences 14:3801–3814. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-3801-2017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Abed RMM, Lam P, de Beer D, Stief P (2013) High rates of denitrification and nitrous oxide emission in arid biological soil crusts from the Sultanate of Oman. Isme J 7:1862–1875. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Delgado-Baquerizo M, Maestre FT, Gallardo A (2013) Biological soil crusts increase the resistance of soil nitrogen dynamics to changes in temperatures in a semi-arid ecosystem. Plant Soil 366:35–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-012-1404-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou H, Gao Y, Jia XH, Wang MM, Ding JJ, Chen L, Bao F, Wu B (2020) Network analysis reveals the strengthening of microbial interaction in biological soil crust development in the Mu Us Sandy Land, northwestern China. Soil Biol Biochem 144:107782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107782

  25. Li JY, Jin XY, Zhang XC, Chen L, Liu JL, Zhang HM, Zhang X, Zhang YF, Zhao JH, Ma ZS, Jin D (2020) Comparative metagenomics of two distinct biological soil crusts in the Tengger Desert. China Soil Biol Biochem 140:107637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2019.107637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Miralles I, Ortega R, Montero-Calasanz MC (2021) Studying the microbiome of cyanobacterial biocrusts from drylands and its functional influence on biogeochemical cycles. Res Square Prepr. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-252045/v1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu R, Wang XP, Pan YX, Zhang YF, Zhang H, Chen N (2015) Seasonal variation of net N mineralization under different biological soil crusts in Tengger Desert, North China. CATENA 127:9–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.12.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jia X, Zha TS, Wu B, Zhang YQ, Gong JN, Qin SG, Chen GP, Qian D, Kellomaki S, Peltola H (2014) Biophysical controls on net ecosystem CO2 exchange over a semiarid shrubland in northwest China. Biogeosciences 11:4679–4693. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4679-2014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Lai ZR, Zhang YQ, Liu JB, Wu B, Qin SG, Fa KY (2016) Fine-root distribution, production, decomposition, and effect on soil organic carbon of three revegetation shrub species in northwest China. Forest Ecol Manag 359:381–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.04.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37:29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gregorich EG, Wen G, Voroney RP, Kachanoski RG (1990) Calibration of a rapid direct chloroform extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol Biochem 22:1009–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90148-S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Brookes PC, Landman A, Pruden G, Jenkinson DS (1985) Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 17:837–842. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(85)90144-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Wang HL, Sun L (2018) Comparative metagenomic analysis of the microbial communities in the surroundings of Iheya north and Iheya ridge hydrothermal fields reveals insights into the survival strategy of microorganisms in deep-sea environments. J Mar Syst 180:102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2016.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Luo RB, Liu BH, Xie YL, Li ZY, Huang WH, Yuan JY, He GZ, Chen YX, Pan Q, Liu YJ, Tang JB, Wu GX, Zhang H, Shi YJ, Liu Y, Yu C, Wang B, Lu Y, Han CL, Cheung DW, Yiu SM, Peng SL, Zhu XQ, Liu GM, Liao XK, Li YR, Yang HM, Wang J, Lam T-W, Wang J (2012) SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217x-1-18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Li JH, Jia HJ, Cai XH, Zhong HZ, Feng Q, Sunagawa S, Arumugam M, Kultima JR, Prifti E, Nielsen T, Juncker AS, Manichanh C, Chen B, Zhang WW, Levenez F, Wang J, Xu X, Xiao L, Liang SS, Zhang DY, Zhang ZX, Chen WN, Zhao HL, Al-Aama JY, Edris S, Yang HM, Wang J, Hansen T, Nielsen HB, Brunak S, Kristiansen K, Guarner F, Pedersen O, Dore J, Ehrlich SD, Bork P, Wang J, Meta HITC (2014) An integrated catalog of reference genes in the human gut microbiome. Nat Biotechnol 32:834–841. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2942

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huson DH, Mitra S, Ruscheweyh H-J, Weber N, Schuster SC (2011) Integrative analysis of environmental sequences using MEGAN4. Genome Res 21:1552–1560. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.120618.111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Karlsson FH, Tremaroli V, Nookaew I, Bergstrom G, Behre CJ, Fagerberg B, Nielsen J, Backhed F (2013) Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control. Nature 498:99–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Altschul S, Madden T, Schaffer A, Zhang JH, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman D (1998) Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Faseb J 12:A1326–A1326. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Dhariwal A, Chong J, Habib S, King IL, Agellon LB, Xia J (2017) Microbiome analyst: a web-based tool for comprehensive statistical, visual and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W180–W188. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Chong J, Liu P, Zhou G, Xia J (2020) Using microbiome analyst for comprehensive statistical, functional, and meta-analysis of microbiome data. Nat Protoc 15:799–821. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-019-0264-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Xia R (2020) TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Mol Plant 13:1194–1202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miralles I, Trasar-Cepeda C, Leirós M, Gil-Sotres F (2013) Labile carbon in biological soil crusts in the Tabernas desert, SE Spain. Soil Biol Biochem 58:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N (2009) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:5111–5120. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.00335-09

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Goldfarb KC, Karaoz U, Hanson CA, Santee CA, Bradford MA, Treseder KK, Wallenstein MD, Brodie EL (2011) Differential growth responses of soil bacterial taxa to carbon substrates of varying chemical recalcitrance. Front Microbiol 2:94. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2011.00094

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Griffiths BS, Philippot L (2013) Insights into the resistance and resilience of the soil microbial community. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:112–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2012.00343.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kuramae EE, Etienne Y, Wong LC, Pijl AS, Van VJA, Kowalchuk GA (2015) Soil characteristics more strongly influence soil bacterial communities than land-use type. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 79:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2011.01192.x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Canfora L, Bacci G, Pinzari F, Lo Papa G, Dazzi C, Benedetti A (2014) Salinity and bacterial diversity: to what extent does the concentration of salt affect the bacterial community in a saline soil? PLoS ONE 9:e106662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106662

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Tian C, Xi J, Ju MC, Li YH, Guo Q, Yao L, Wang C, Lin YB, Li Q, Williams WJ, Bu CF (2021) Biocrust microbiomes influence ecosystem structure and function in the Mu Us Sandland, northwest China. Ecol Inform 66:101441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoinf.2021.101441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yu TT, Li M, Niu MY, Fan XB, Liang WY, Wang FP (2018) Difference of nitrogen-cycling microbes between shallow bay and deep-sea sediments in the South China Sea. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:447–459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-017-8594-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vetrovsky T, Steffen KT, Baldrian P (2014) Potential of cometabolic transformation of polysaccharides and lignin in lignocellulose by soil Actinobacteria. PLoS ONE 9:e89108. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089108

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Qiao S, Bao L, Wang K, Sun S, Liu H (2020) Activation of a specific gut Bacteroides-folate-liver axis benefits for the alleviation of nonalcoholic hepatic steatosis. Cell Rep 32:108005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pankratov TA, Ivanova AO, Dedysh SN, Liesack W (2011) Bacterial populations and environmental factors controlling cellulose degradation in an acidic Sphagnum peat. Environ Microbiol 13:1800–1814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02491.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Gundlapally SR, Garcia-Pichel F (2006) The community and phylogenetic diversity of biological soil crusts in the Colorado Plateau studied by molecular fingerprinting and intensive cultivation. Microb Ecol 52:345–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-006-9011-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pepe-Ranney C, Koechli C, Potrafka R, Andam C, Eggleston E, Garcia-Pichel F, Buckley DH (2016) Non-cyanobacterial diazotrophs mediate dinitrogen fixation in biological soil crusts during early crust formation. Isme J 10:287–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2015.106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Kidron GJ, Vonshak A, Abeliovich A (2008) Recovery rates of microbiotic crusts within a dune ecosystem in the Negev Desert. Geomorphology 100:444–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Abed RMM, Al Kharusi S, Schramm A, Robinson MD (2010) Bacterial diversity, pigments and nitrogen fixation of biological desert crusts from the Sultanate of Oman. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 72:418–428. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00854.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Phuong Thi L, Makhalanyane TP, Guerrero LD, Vikram S, Van de Peer Y, Cowan DA (2016) Comparative metagenomic analysis reveals mechanisms for stress response in hypoliths from extreme hyperarid deserts. Genome Biol Evol 8:2737–2747. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evw189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Chilton AM, Neilan BA, Eldridge DJ (2018) Biocrust morphology is linked to marked differences in microbial community composition. Plant Soil 429:65–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3442-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Liu Y, Zhao L, Wang Z, Liu L, Zhang P, Sun J, Wang B, Song G, Li X (2018) Changes in functional gene structure and metabolic potential of the microbial community in biological soil crusts along a revegetation chronosequence in the Tengger Desert. Soil Biol Biochem 126:40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2018.08.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhao LN, Liu YB, Wang ZR, Yuan SW, Qi JH, Zhang WL, Wang YS, Li XR (2020) Bacteria and fungi differentially contribute to carbon and nitrogen cycles during biological soil crust succession in arid ecosystems. Plant Soil 447:379–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-019-04391-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Suchao MA, Yilang W, Hongyi AO, Gongliang YU, Renhui LI (2019) A newly recorded cyanobacterial genus Geminocystis in China and its taxonomic and ecological notes. J Lake Sci 31:236–242. https://doi.org/10.18307/2019.0122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Duan QQ, Yang XH, Huang XZ (2017) The diversity of microbial resources in ecological mulberry rhizosphere soil in a rocky desertification area. J Southwest Univ (Nat Sci Ed) 39:25–29. https://doi.org/10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Saul DJ, Aislabie JM, Brown CE, Harris L, Foght JM (2005) Hydrocarbon contamination changes the bacterial diversity of soil from around Scott Base, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:141–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsec.2004.11.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mager DM, Thomas AD (2011) Extracellular polysaccharides from cyanobacterial soil crusts: a review of their role in dryland soil processes. J Arid Environ 75:91–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2010.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Mager DM (2010) Carbohydrates in cyanobacterial soil crusts as a source of carbon in the southwest Kalahari, Botswana. Soil Biol Biochem 42:313–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.11.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Corfield AP, Berry M (2015) Glycan variation and evolution in the eukaryotes. Trends Biochem Sci 40:351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2015.04.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Adam PS, Borrel G, Gribaldo S (2018) Evolutionary history of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase/acetyl-CoA synthase, one of the oldest enzymatic complexes. P Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E1166–E1173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716667115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Ji M, Greening C, Vanwonterghem I, Carere CR, Bay SK, Steen JA, Montgomery K, Lines T, Beardall J, van Dorst J, Snape I, Stott MB, Hugenholtz P, Ferrari BC (2017) Atmospheric trace gases support primary production in Antarctic desert surface soil. Nature 552:400–403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature25014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. King GM, Weber CF (2007) Distribution, diversity and ecology of aerobic CO-oxidizing bacteria. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:107–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Wang C, Wang XB, Liu DW, Wu HH, Lu XT, Fang YT, Cheng WX, Luo WT, Jiang P, Shi J, Yin HQ, Zhou JZ, Han XG, Bai E (2014) Aridity threshold in controlling ecosystem nitrogen cycling in arid and semi-arid grasslands. Nat Commun 5:4799. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5799

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kidron GJ, Posmanik R, Brunner T, Nejidat A (2015) Spatial abundance of microbial nitrogen-transforming genes and inorganic nitrogen in biocrusts along a transect of an arid sand dune in the Negev Desert. Soil Biol Biochem 83:150–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.01.024

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Ghaly AE, Ramakrishnan VV (2015) Nitrogen sources and cycling in the ecosystem and its role in air, water and soil pollution: a critical review. J Poullut Eff Control 3:136. https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4397.1000136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Strauss SL, Day TA, Garcia-Pichel F (2012) Nitrogen cycling in desert biological soil crusts across biogeographic regions in the southwestern United States. Biogeochemistry 108:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-011-9587-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Yang YF, Gao Y, Wang SP, Xu DP, Yu H, Wu LW, Lin QY, Hu YG, Li XZ, He ZL, Deng Y, Zhou JZ (2014) The microbial gene diversity along an elevation gradient of the Tibetan grassland. Isme J 8:430–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2013.146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all people involved in the maintenance of the experiment. This research was funded by the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (41971131) and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFE0203400, 2017YFC0504703).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Chang Tian and Jingwen Pang are parallel first authors and contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China

    Chang Tian, Jingwen Pang, Chongfeng Bu, Yahong Li & Qi Guo

  2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, CAS & MWR, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China

    Chang Tian & Chongfeng Bu

  3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100049, China

    Chang Tian

  4. College of Water Resources and Architectural Engineering, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi, 712100, China

    Shufang Wu

  5. Sichuan Expressway Construction & Development Group Co., Ltd, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China

    Hao Bai

  6. The UWA Institute of Agriculture and School of Agriculture & Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, 6001, Australia

    Kadambot H. M. Siddique

Authors
  1. Chang Tian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jingwen Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Chongfeng Bu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shufang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hao Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yahong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Qi Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kadambot H. M. Siddique
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Chongfeng Bu conceived the ideas and designed the methodology; Chang Tian, Jingwen Pang, Yahong Li, and Qi Guo collected the data; Chang Tian and Jingwen Pang analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript; Shufang Wu, Hao Bai, and Kadambot H.M. Siddique contributed critically to the manuscript. All authors gave final approval for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chongfeng Bu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 374 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tian, C., Pang, J., Bu, C. et al. The Microbiomes in Lichen and Moss Biocrust Contribute Differently to Carbon and Nitrogen Cycles in Arid Ecosystems. Microb Ecol 86, 497–508 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02077-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-022-02077-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation