Optimality of the fully discrete filtered backprojection algorithm for tomographic inversion

1. Aubin J.-P. (2000). Applied Functional Analysis, Pure & Applied Mathematics. Wiley, New York

   Google Scholar 

2. Brenner, S.C., Scott, L.R.: The Mathematical Theory of Finite Element Methods, vol. 15 of Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, New York (1994)

3. Galigekere R.R., Wiesent K. and Holdsworth D.W. (1999). Techniques to alleviate the effects of view aliasing artifacts in computed tomography. Med. Phys. 26: 896–904

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Giusti E. (1984). Minimal Surfaces and Functions of Bounded Variation. Birkhäuser, Basel

   MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Kress, R.: Numerical Analysis, vol. 181 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, New York (1998)

6. Lewitt R.M., Bates R.H.T. and Peters T.M. (1978). Image reconstruction from projections II: Modified backprojection methods. Optik 50: 85–109

   Google Scholar 

7. Lions J.L. and Magenes E. (1972). Non-Homogeneous Boundary Value Problems and Applications, Vol. 1. Springer, New York

   Google Scholar 

8. Louis A.K. and Natterer F. (1983). Mathematical problems in computerized tomography. Proc. IEEE 71: 379–389

   Google Scholar 

9. Natterer, F.: Genauigkeitsfragen bei der numerischen Rekonstruktion von Bildern, vol. 49 of International series of numerical mathematics (ISNM), Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel, Switzerland, pp. 131–146 (1979)

10. Natterer F. (1980). A Sobolev space analysis of picture reconstruction. SIAM J. Appl. Math. 39: 402–411

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

11. Natterer F. (1986). The Mathematics of Computerized Tomography. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Rieder A. and Faridani A. (2003). The semi-discrete filtered backprojection algorithm is optimal for tomographic inversion. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 41: 869–892

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

13. Rieder A. and Schuster Th. (2000). The approximate inverse in action with an application to computerized tomography. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 37: 1909–1929

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

14. Schneck, A.: Konvergenz von Rekonstruktionsalgorithmen in der 2D-Tomographie: Der voll-diskrete Fall (Convergence of reconstruction algorithms in 2D-tomography: The fully discrete case). Diploma thesis, Fakultät für Mathematik, Universität Karlsruhe, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany (2006)

15. Shepp L.A. and Logan B.F. (1974). The Fourier reconstruction of a head section. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 21: 21–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Smithey D.T., Beck M., Raymer M.G. and Faridani A. (1993). Measurement of the Wigner distribution and the density matrix of a light mode using optical homodyne tomography: application to squeezed states and the vacuum. Phys. Rev. Lett. 70: 1244–1247

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Weiss G.H., Talbert A.J. and Brooks R.A. (1982). The use of phantom views to reduce CT streaks due to insufficient sampling. Phys. Med. Biol. 27: 1151–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references