[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

High-rate precise point positioning (PPP) to measure seismic wave motions: an experimental comparison of GPS PPP with inertial measurement units

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-rate GPS has been widely used to construct displacement waveforms and to invert for source parameters of earthquakes. Almost all works on internal and external evaluation of high-rate GPS accuracy are based on GPS relative positioning. We build an experimental platform to externally evaluate the accuracy of 50-Hz PPP displacement waveforms. Since the shake table allows motion in any of six degrees of freedom, we install an inertial measurement unit (IMU) to measure the attitude of the platform and transform the IMU displacements into the GPS coordinate system. The experimental results have shown that high-rate PPP can produce absolute horizontal displacement waveforms at the accuracy of 2–4 mm and absolute vertical displacement waveforms at the sub-centimeter level of accuracy within a short period of time. The significance of the experiments indicates that high-rate PPP is capable of detecting absolute seismic displacement waveforms at the same high accuracy as GPS relative positioning techniques, but requires no fixed datum station. We have also found a small scaling error of IMU and a small time offset of misalignment between high-rate PPP and IMU displacement waveforms by comparing the amplitudes of and cross-correlating both the displacement waveforms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aki K, Richards PG (2002) Quantitative seismology, 2nd edn. University Science Books, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Avallone A, Marzario M, Cirella A, Piatanesi A, Rovelli A, Alessandro CD, D’Anastasio E, D’Agostino N, Giuliani R, Mattone M (2011) Very high rate (10Hz) GPS seismology for moderate-magnitude earthquakes: the case of the Mw6.3 L’Aquila (central Italy) event. J Geophys Res 116:B02305. doi:10.1029/2010JB007834

  • Bertiger W, Desai SD, Haines B, Harvey E, Moore AW, Owen S, Weiss JP (2010) Single receiver phase ambiguity resolution with GPS data. J Geod 84:327–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilich A, Cassidy JF, Larson KM (2008) GPS seismology: application to the 2002 Mw7.9 Denali Fault earthquake. Bull Seismol Soc Am 98:593–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y, Nikolaidis RM, de Jonge PJ (2000) Instantaneous geodetic positioning at medium distances with the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 116(B12):28223–28253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y, Prawirodirdjo L, Melbourne TI (2004) Detection of arbitrarily large dynamic ground motions with a dense high-rate GPS network. Geophys Res Lett 31:L06604. doi:10.1029/2003GL019150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock Y, Melgar D, Crowell BW (2011) Real-time strong-motion broadband displacements from collocated gps and accelerometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 101:2904–2925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Niell A, Tregoning P, Schuh H (2006) Global Mapping Function (GMF): a new empirical mapping function based on numerical weather model data. Geophys Res Lett 33:L07304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boore DM, Bommer JJ (2005) Processing of strong-motion accelerograms: needs, options and consequences. Soil Dynam Earthq Eng 25:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossler JD, Goad CC, Bender PL (1980) Using the Global Positioning System (GPS) for geodetic positioning. Bull Géod 54:553–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinton JF (2004) Modern digital seismology—instrumentation, and small amplitude studies in the engineering world, PhD thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California

  • Colosimo G, Crespi M, Mazzoni A (2011) Real-time GPS seismology with a stand-alone receiver: a preliminary feasibility demonstration. J Geophys Res 116:B11302. doi:10.1029/2010JB007941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Counselman CC, Shapiro II (1979) Miniature interferometer terminals for Earth surveying. Bull Géod 53:139–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowell BW, Bock Y, Melgar D (2012) Real-time inversion of GPS data for finite fault modeling and rapid hazard assessment. Geophys Res Lett 39:L09305. doi:10.1029/2012GL051318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dach R, Hugentobler U, Fridez P, Meindl M (2007) Bernese GPS software version 5.0. Astronomical Institute, University of Bern, Bern

  • Davis JP, Smalley R Jr (2009) Love wave dispersion in central North America determined using absolute displacement seismograms from high-rate GPS. J Geophys Res 114:B11303. doi:10.1029/2009JB006288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elósegui P, Davis JL, Oberlander D, Baena R, Ekström G (2006) Accuracy of high-rate GPS for seismology. Geophys Res Lett 33:L11308. doi:10.1029/2006GL026065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emore GL, Haase JS, Choi K, Larson KM, Yamagiwa A (2007) Recovering seismic displacements through combined use of 1-Hz GPS and strong-motion accelerometers. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:357–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eueler H, Goad CC (1991) On optimal filtering of GPS dual frequency observations without using orbit information. Bull Géod 65:130–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell JA, Givargis TD, Barth MJ (2000) Real-time differential carrier phase GPS-aided INS. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 8:709–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genrich JF, Bock Y (2006) Instantaneous geodetic positioning with 10–50 Hz GPS measurements: Noise characteristics and implications for monitoring networks. J Geophys Res 111:B03403. doi:10.1029/2005JB003617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graizer V (2009) Tutorial on measuring rotations using multipendulum systems. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:1064–1072

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graizer V (2010) Strong motion recordings and residual displacements: what are we actually recording in strong motion seismology? Seismol Res Lett 81:635–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge L, Han S, Rizos C, Ishikawa Y, Hoshiba M, Yoshida Y, Izawa M, Hashimoto N, Himori S (2000) GPS seismometers with up to 20 Hz sampling rate. Earth Planets Space 52:881–884

    Google Scholar 

  • Ge MR, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82:389–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal MS, Weill LR, Andrews AP (2001) Global positioning systems, inertial navigation and integration. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang DH, Lim DW, Cho SL, Lee SJ (2011) Unified approach to ultra-tightly-coupled GPS/INS integrated navigation system. IEEE AE Syst Mag 2011:30–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji C, Larson KM, Tan Y, Hudnut KW, Choi K (2004) Slip history of the 2003 San Simon earthquake constrained by combining 1-Hz GPS, strong motion, and teleseismic data. Geophys Res Lett 31:L17608. doi:10.1029/2004GL020448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2003) Measuring seismic waves induced by large earthquakes with GPS. Stud Geophys Geod 47:741–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J (2005) A possible detection of the 26 December 2004 great Sumatra-Andaman islands earthquake with solution products of the international GNSS service. Stud Geophys Geod 49:463–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise point positioning using IGS orbits and products. GPS Solut 5:12–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KM (2009) GPS seismology. J Geod 83:227–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KM, Bodin P, Gomberg J (2003) Using 1-Hz GPS data to measure deformations caused by the Denali fault earthquake. Science 300:1421–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ge M (2003) PANDA software and its preliminary result of positioning and orbit determination. J Nat Sci Wuhan Univ 8(2B):603609. doi:10.1007/BF02899825

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDoran PF (1979) Satellite emission radio interferometric Earth surveying series—GPS geodetic system. Bull Géod 53:117–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melgar D, Bock Y, Crowell B (2012) Real-time centroid moment tensor determination for large earthquakes from local and regional displacement records. Geophys J Int 188:703–718. doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05297.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolaidis RM, Bock Y, de Jonge PJ, Shearer P, Agnew DC, van Domselaar M (2001) Seismic wave observations with the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res 106(B10):21897–21916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning T, Johansson JM, Scherneck H-G, Jarlemark POJ, Emardson R (2009) High-rate GNSS techniques for the detection of large seismic displacements. In: Proceedings of IGARSS2009, July 12–17, Cape Town, South, Africa, pp V359–V362

  • Naranjo JE, Jiménez F, Aparicio F, Zato J (2009) GPS and inertial systems for high precision positioning on motorways. J Navigation 62:351–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Meilano I, Sagiya T, Kimata F, Hirahara K (2006) Large surface wave of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake captured by the very long baseline kinematic analysis of 1-Hz GPS data. Earth Planets Space 58:153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Ohzono M, Miura S, Iinuma T, Tachibana K, Takatsuka K, Miyao K, Sato T, Umino N (2008) Coseismic fault model of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku earthquake deduced by a dense GPS network. Earth Planets Space 60:1197–1201

    Google Scholar 

  • Prescott WH, Davis JL, Svarc JL (1989) Global Positioning System measurements for crustal deformation: precision and accuracy. Science 244:1337–1340

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondi BW (1985) Performing centimeter-level surveys in seconds with GPS carrier phase: initial results. Navigation 32:386–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar D, Hernandez-Pajares M, Juan-Zornoza JM, Sanz-Subirana J, Aragon-Angel A (2011) EVA: GPS-based extended velocity and acceleration determination. J Geod 85:329–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi C, Zhao Q, Geng J, Lou Y, Ge M, Liu J (2008) Recent development of PANDA software in GNSS data processing. In: Proceedings of the Society of Photographic Instrumentation Engineers, 7285, 72851S. doi:10.1117/12.816261

  • Shi C, Lou Y, Zhang H, Zhao Q, Geng J, Wang R, Fang R, Liu J (2010) Seismic deformation of the Mw8.0 Wenchuan earthquake from high-rate GPS observations. Adv Space Res 46:228–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimada S, Fujinawa Y, Sekiguchi S, Ohmi S, Eguchi T, Okada Y (1990) Detection of a volcanic fracture opening in Japan using Global Positioning System measurements. Nature 343:631–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalley R Jr (2009) High-rate GPS: how high do we need to go? Seism Res Lett 80:1054–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeo M (2009) Rotational motions observed during an earthquake swarm in April 1998 Offshore Ito, Japan. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:1457–1467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Boore DM, Tang G, Zhou X (2007) Comparisons of ground motions from colocated and closely spaced one-sample-per-second Global Positioning System and accelerograph recordings of the 2003 M6.5 San Simon, California, earthquake in the Parkfield region. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:76–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendel J, Meister O, Schlaile C, Trommer CF (2006) An integrated GPS/MEMS-IMU navigation system for an autonomous helicopter. Aerosp Sci Technol 10:527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wielandt E, Streckeisen G (1982) The leaf-spring seismometer: design and performance. Bull Seismol Soc Am 72:2349–2367

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokota Y, Koketsu K, Hikima K, Miyazaki S (2009) Ability of 1-Hz GPS data to infer the source process of a medium-sized earthquake: the case of the 2008 Iwate-Miyagi Nairiku, Japan, earthquake. Geophys Res Lett 36:L12301. doi:10.1029/2009GL037799

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to the reviewers, the associate editor, Prof. J. Kusche, and the Editor-in-Chief, Prof. R. Klees, for their very constructive comments and for bringing a few articles on the topic, just published or in press, to the attention of the authors while this paper was under review, which have resulted in a significant improvement of the presentation of the paper. They are also grateful to one of the reviewers for polishing the English of the text. This work is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Projects 41104024, 41174028 and 41231174) and the 111 Project B07037, PRC Ministry of Education. Finally, the authors are also grateful to Prof. T. Shibutani, a seismologist at Kyoto University, for personal communication on 7 Nov 2012 about frequency range of strong motions in the case of large earthquakes.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuang Shi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, P., Shi, C., Fang, R. et al. High-rate precise point positioning (PPP) to measure seismic wave motions: an experimental comparison of GPS PPP with inertial measurement units. J Geod 87, 361–372 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0606-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-012-0606-z

Keywords

Navigation