Testing a parameter restriction on the boundary for the g-and-h distribution: a simulated approach

• Bee M, Trapin L (2016) A simple approach to the estimation of Tukey’s gh distribution. J Stat Comput Simul 86(16):3287–3302

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Bee M, Hambuckers J, Trapin L (2019a) Estimating value-at-risk for the g-and-h distribution: an indirect inference approach. Quant Finance 19(8):1255–1266

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Bee M, Hambuckers J, Trapin L (2019b) An improved approach for estimating large losses in insurance analytics and operational risk using the g-and-h distribution. DEM working papers 2019/11

• Byrd RH, Lu P, Nocedal J, Zhu C (1995) A limited memory algorithm for bound constrained optimization. SIAM J Sci Comput 16(5):1190–1208

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Clementi F, Gallegati M (2005) Pareto’s law of income distribution: evidence for Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. In: Yarlagadda S, Chakrabarti B, Chatterjee A (eds) Econophysics of wealth distributions. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–14

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Cramér H (1946) Mathematical methods of statistics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Cruz M, Peters G, Shevchenko P (2015) Fundamental aspects of operational risk and insurance analytics: a handbook of operational risk. Wiley, Hoboken

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Degen M, Embrechts P, Lambrigger DD (2007) The quantitative modeling of operational risk: between g-and-h and EVT. Astin Bull 37(2):265–291

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Drovandi CC, Pettitt AN (2011) Likelihood-free Bayesian estimation of multivariate quantile distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal 55(9):2541–2556

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Dupuis D, Field C (2004) Large wind speeds: modeling and outlier detection. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 9(1):105–121

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dutta KK, Babbel DF (2002) On measuring skewness and kurtosis in short rate distributions: the case of the US dollar London inter bank offer rates. Wharton School Center for Financial Institutions, University of Pennsylvania 02-25

• Dutta KK, Perry J (2006) A tale of tails: an empirical analysis of loss distribution models for estimating operational risk capital. Technical Report 06-13, Federal Reserve Bank of Boston

• Field C, Genton MG (2006) The multivariate g-and-h distribution. Technometrics 48(1):104–111

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Fischer M, Horn A, Klein I (2007) Tukey-type distributions in the context of financial data. Commun Stat Theory Methods 36(1):23–35

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Gibrat R (1931) Les Inégalités Économiques. Sirey, Paris

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Groll A, Hambuckers J, Kneib T, Umlauf N (2019) Lasso-type penalization in the framework of generalized additive models for location, scale and shape. Comput Stat Data Anal 140:59–73

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Hambuckers J, Groll A, Kneib T (2018) Understanding the economic determinants of the severity of operational losses: a regularized Generalized Pareto regression approach. J Appl Econom 33(6):898–935

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Hoaglin DC (1985) Summarizing shape numerically: the g-and-h distributions, vol 11. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 461–513

  Google Scholar 

• Jiménez JA, Arunachalam V (2011) Using Tukey’s g and h family of distributions to calculate value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 13(4):95–116

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kleiber C, Kotz S (2003) Statistical size distributions in economics and actuarial sciences. Wiley, Hoboken

  Book  Google Scholar 

• McDonald JB, Sorensen J, Turley PA (2013) Skewness and kurtosis properties of income distribution models. Rev Income Wealth 59(2):360–374

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McNeil A, Frey R, Embrechts P (2015) Quantitative risk management: concepts, techniques, tools, 2nd edn. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Peters GW, Sisson S (2006) Bayesian inference, Monte Carlo sampling and operational risk. J Oper Risk 1(3):27–50

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peters GW, Chen WY, Gerlach RH (2016) Estimating quantile families of loss distributions for non-life insurance modelling via L-moments. Risks 4(2):14

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prangle D (2017) gk: an R Package for the g-and-k and generalised g-and-h distributions. arXiv e-prints 1706.06889v1

• Rayner GD, MacGillivray HL (2002) Numerical maximum likelihood estimation for the g-and-k and generalized g-and-h distributions. Stat Comput 12(1):57–75

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Self SG, Liang KY (1987) Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J Am Stat Assoc 82(398):605–610

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Tukey JW (1977) Modern techniques in data analysis. In: NSF-sponsored regional research conference at Southern Massachusetts University, North Dartmouth

• Wolny-Dominiak A, Trzesiok M (2014) insuranceData: a collection of insurance datasets useful in risk classification in non-life insurance. R package version 1.0

• Xu G, Genton MG (2015) Efficient maximum approximated likelihood inference for Tukey’s g-and-h distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 91:78–91

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Xu G, Genton MG (2017) Tukey g-and-h random fields. J Am Stat Assoc 112(519):1236–1249

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references