The Monte Carlo EM method for estimating multinomial probit latent variable models

• Albert JH and Chib S (1993). Bayesian analysis of polychotomous response data. J Am Stat Assoc 88: 669–679

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Ashford JR and Sowden RR (1970). Multi-variate probit analysis. Biometrics 26: 535–546

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bock RD and Gibbons RD (1996). High-dimensional multivariate probit analysis. Biometrics 52: 1183–1194

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Börsch-Supan A and Hajivassiliou V (1994). Smooth unbiased multivariate probability simulators for maximum likelihood estimation of limited dependent variable models. J Econometrics 58: 347–368

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bunch DS (1991). Estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transport Res 25: 1–12

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Chan JSK and Kuk AYC (1997). Maximum likelihood estimation for probit-linear mixed models with correlated random effects. Biometrics 53: 86–97

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Daganzo C (1980). Multinomial Probit. Academic, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Dansie B (1985). Parameter estimability in the multinomial probit model. Transport Res 19: 526–528

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dempster AP, Laird NM and Rubin DB (1977). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete observations. J R Stat Soc B 39: 1–38

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Diebolt J, Ip EHS (1998) Stochastic EM: method and application. In: Gilks W, Richardson S, Spiegelhalter DJ (eds) Markov Chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman & Hall, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Geweke JF, Keane MP, Runkle DE (1994) Statistical inference in multiperiod probit model. Research Department Staff Report 177, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, MN

• Hajivassiliou V, McFadden D, Ruud D (1992) Simulation of multivariate normal orthant probabilities: methods and programs, Discussion Paper 1021, Cowles Foundation, Yale University, CT

• Hausman J and Wise D (1978). A conditional probit model for qualitative choice: discrete decisions recognizing interdependence and heterogeneous preferences. Econometrica 45: 319–339

  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Hartley H (1958). Maximum likelihood estimation from incomplete data. Biometrics 14: 179–194

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Keane M (1992). A note on identification in the multinomial probit model. J Business Econom Stat 10: 193–200

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• Jöreskog KG (1979) Advances in factor analysis. In: Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (eds) Advances in factor analysis and structural equation models, Part I. Abt Books, Cambridge

• Lee SY and Song XY (2003). Bayesian analysis of structural equation models with dichotomous variables. Stat Med 22: 3073–3088

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lerman S and Manski C (1981). On the use of simulated frequencies to approximate choice probabilities. In: Manski, C and McFadden, D (eds) Structural analysis of discrete data with econometric applications, pp 305–319. MIT, Cambridge

  Google Scholar 

• Liu C and Rubin DB (1995). ML estimation of the t distribution using EM and its extensions, ECM and ECME. Stat Sinica 5: 19–39

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Louis TA (1982). Finding the observed information matrix when using the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc B 44: 226–233

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• McCulloch CE (1994). Maximum likelihood variance components estimation for binary data. J Am Stat Assoc 89: 330–335

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• McCulloch R and Rossi PE (1994). An exact likelihood analysis of the multinomial probit model. J Econometrics 64: 207–240

  Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

• McFadden D (1989). A method of simulated moments for estimation of discrete response models without numerical integration. Econometrica 57: 995–1027

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• McLachlan GJ and Krishnan T (1997). The EM algorithm and extensions. Wiley, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Meng XL (1994). On the rate of convergence of the ECM algorithm. Ann Stat 22: 326–339

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Meng XL and Rubin DB (1993). Maximum likelihood estimation via the ECM algorithm: a general framework. Biometrika 80: 267–278

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Meng XL and Schilling S (1996). Fitting full-information item factor models and an empirical investigation of bridge sampling. J Am Stat Assoc 91: 1254–1267

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Natarajan R, McCulloch CE and Kiefer NM (2000). A Monte Carlo EM method for estimating multinomial probit models. Comput Stat Data Anal 34: 33–50

  Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Song XY and Lee SY (2005). A multivariate probit latent variable model for analyzing dichotomous responses. Stat Sinica 15: 645–664

  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Stern S (1992). A method for smoothing simulated moments of discrete probabilities in multinomial probit models. Econometrica 60: 943–952

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Tanner MA (1993). Tools for statistical inference: methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions. Springer, New York

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Walker S (1996). An EM algorithm for nonlinear random effects models. Biometrics 52: 934–944

  Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Wei GCG and Tanner MA (1990). A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man’s data augmentation algorithm. J Am Stat Assoc 85: 699–704

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references