Abstract
One of the applications of data envelopment analysis is fixed costs allocation among homogenous decision making units. In this paper, we first prove that Beasley’s method (Eur J Oper Res 147(1):198–216, 2003), whose infeasibility has been claimed by Amirteimoori and Kordrostami (Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151, 2005), always has a feasible solution and the efficiency invariance principle does not necessarily satisfy in Amirteimoori and Kordrostami’s method (Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151, 2005). Hence, we present two equitable methods for fixed cost allocation based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles such that, if possible, they help meet these two principles. In the first method, the costs are allocated to DMU in such a way that the efficiency score of DMUs does not change, and simultaneously this allocation has the minimum distance from the allocation that has been obtained with a common set of weights. However, in the second method, the costs are allocated in such a way that input and output of all units have a common set of weights and it has the minimum distance from the allocation that satisfies the efficiency invariance principle. Moreover, both methods, consider the satisfaction of each unit of the allocated cost. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated by two real world examples.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We have used CPLEX solver to solve presented models in this paper.
References
Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2005) Allocating fixed costs and target setting: a dea-based approach. Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151
Beasley JE (2003) Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):198–216
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444
Charnes A, Cooper W, Wei QL, Huang Z (1989) Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Int J Syst Sci 20(7):1099–1118
Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB (1990) Polyhedral cone-ratio dea models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econom 46(1):73–91
Cook WD, Kress M (1999) Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a dea approach. Eur J Oper Res 119(3):652–661
Cook WD, Zhu J (2005) Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a dea approach. Comput Oper Res 32(8):2171–2178
Du J, Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2014) Fixed cost and resource allocation based on dea cross-efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 235(1):206–214
Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Shoja N, Sanei M (2004) An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using dea. Appl Math Comput 153(1):267–274
Li Y, Yang F, Liang L, Hua Z (2009) Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: a dea approach. Eur J Oper Res 197(1):389–401
Li Y, Yang M, Chen Y, Dai Q, Liang L (2013) Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree. Omega 41(1):55–60
Lin R (2011a) Allocating fixed costs and common revenue via data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 218(7):3680–3688
Lin R (2011b) Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 217(13):6349–6358
Lotfi FH, Hatami-Marbini A, Agrell PJ, Aghayi N, Gholami K (2013) Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights dea approach. Comput Ind Eng 64(2):631–640
Moulin H (1994) Serial cost-sharing of excludable public goods. Rev Econ Stud 61(2):305–325
Moulin H, Shenker S (1992) Serial cost sharing. Econom: J Econom Soc 60(5):1009–1037
Moulin H, Shenker S (1994) Average cost pricing versus serial cost sharing: an axiomatic comparison. J Econ Theory 64(1):178–201
Si X, Liang L, Jia G, Yang L, Wu H, Li Y (2013) Proportional sharing and dea in allocating the fixed cost. Appl Math Comput 219(12):6580–6590
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jahanshahloo, G.R., Sadeghi, J. & Khodabakhshi, M. Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles. Math Meth Oper Res 85, 223–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0563-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0563-z