[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One of the applications of data envelopment analysis is fixed costs allocation among homogenous decision making units. In this paper, we first prove that Beasley’s method (Eur J Oper Res 147(1):198–216, 2003), whose infeasibility has been claimed by Amirteimoori and Kordrostami (Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151, 2005), always has a feasible solution and the efficiency invariance principle does not necessarily satisfy in Amirteimoori and Kordrostami’s method (Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151, 2005). Hence, we present two equitable methods for fixed cost allocation based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles such that, if possible, they help meet these two principles. In the first method, the costs are allocated to DMU in such a way that the efficiency score of DMUs does not change, and simultaneously this allocation has the minimum distance from the allocation that has been obtained with a common set of weights. However, in the second method, the costs are allocated in such a way that input and output of all units have a common set of weights and it has the minimum distance from the allocation that satisfies the efficiency invariance principle. Moreover, both methods, consider the satisfaction of each unit of the allocated cost. Finally, the proposed method is illustrated by two real world examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We have used CPLEX solver to solve presented models in this paper.

References

  • Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S (2005) Allocating fixed costs and target setting: a dea-based approach. Appl Math Comput 171(1):136–151

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley JE (2003) Allocating fixed costs and resources via data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):198–216

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper W, Wei QL, Huang Z (1989) Cone ratio data envelopment analysis and multi-objective programming. Int J Syst Sci 20(7):1099–1118

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Huang ZM, Sun DB (1990) Polyhedral cone-ratio dea models with an illustrative application to large commercial banks. J Econom 46(1):73–91

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Kress M (1999) Characterizing an equitable allocation of shared costs: a dea approach. Eur J Oper Res 119(3):652–661

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cook WD, Zhu J (2005) Allocation of shared costs among decision making units: a dea approach. Comput Oper Res 32(8):2171–2178

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Du J, Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2014) Fixed cost and resource allocation based on dea cross-efficiency. Eur J Oper Res 235(1):206–214

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanshahloo GR, Lotfi FH, Shoja N, Sanei M (2004) An alternative approach for equitable allocation of shared costs by using dea. Appl Math Comput 153(1):267–274

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yang F, Liang L, Hua Z (2009) Allocating the fixed cost as a complement of other cost inputs: a dea approach. Eur J Oper Res 197(1):389–401

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Yang M, Chen Y, Dai Q, Liang L (2013) Allocating a fixed cost based on data envelopment analysis and satisfaction degree. Omega 41(1):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin R (2011a) Allocating fixed costs and common revenue via data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 218(7):3680–3688

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lin R (2011b) Allocating fixed costs or resources and setting targets via data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput 217(13):6349–6358

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lotfi FH, Hatami-Marbini A, Agrell PJ, Aghayi N, Gholami K (2013) Allocating fixed resources and setting targets using a common-weights dea approach. Comput Ind Eng 64(2):631–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H (1994) Serial cost-sharing of excludable public goods. Rev Econ Stud 61(2):305–325

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H, Shenker S (1992) Serial cost sharing. Econom: J Econom Soc 60(5):1009–1037

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin H, Shenker S (1994) Average cost pricing versus serial cost sharing: an axiomatic comparison. J Econ Theory 64(1):178–201

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Si X, Liang L, Jia G, Yang L, Wu H, Li Y (2013) Proportional sharing and dea in allocating the fixed cost. Appl Math Comput 219(12):6580–6590

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammad Khodabakhshi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jahanshahloo, G.R., Sadeghi, J. & Khodabakhshi, M. Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles. Math Meth Oper Res 85, 223–240 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0563-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-016-0563-z

Keywords

Navigation