[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Portfolio-optimization models for small investors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mathematical Methods of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since 2010, the client base of online-trading service providers has grown significantly. Such companies enable small investors to access the stock market at advantageous rates. Because small investors buy and sell stocks in moderate amounts, they should consider fixed transaction costs, integral transaction units, and dividends when selecting their portfolio. In this paper, we consider the small investor’s problem of investing capital in stocks in a way that maximizes the expected portfolio return and guarantees that the portfolio risk does not exceed a prescribed risk level. Portfolio-optimization models known from the literature are in general designed for institutional investors and do not consider the specific constraints of small investors. We therefore extend four well-known portfolio-optimization models to make them applicable for small investors. We consider one nonlinear model that uses variance as a risk measure and three linear models that use the mean absolute deviation from the portfolio return, the maximum loss, and the conditional value-at-risk as risk measures. We extend all models to consider piecewise-constant transaction costs, integral transaction units, and dividends. In an out-of-sample experiment based on Swiss stock-market data and the cost structure of the online-trading service provider Swissquote, we apply both the basic models and the extended models; the former represent the perspective of an institutional investor, and the latter the perspective of a small investor. The basic models compute portfolios that yield on average a slightly higher return than the portfolios computed with the extended models. However, all generated portfolios yield on average a higher return than the Swiss performance index. There are considerable differences between the four risk measures with respect to the mean realized portfolio return and the standard deviation of the realized portfolio return.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonami P, Lejeune M (2009) An exact solution approach for portfolio optimization problems under stochastic and integer constraints. Operat Res 57: 650–670

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Loera J, Hemmecke R, Köppe M, Weismantel R (2008a) FPTAS for optimizing polynomials over the mixed-integer points of polytopes in fixed dimension. Math Program 115: 273–290

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • De Loera J, Hemmecke R, Onn S, Weismantel R (2008b) N-fold integer programming. Discret Opt 5: 231–241

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H, Wijayanayake A (2001) Portfolio optimization problem under concave transaction costs and minimal transaction unit constraints. Math Program 89: 233–250

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H, Yamamoto R (2005) Integer programming approaches in mean-risk models. Comput Manag Sci 2: 339–351

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Konno H, Yamazaki H (1991) Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its applications to tokyo stock market. Manag Sci 17: 519–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthi HJ, Doege J (2005) Convex risk measures for portfolio optimization and concepts of flexibility. Math Program 104: 541–559

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lüthi HJ, Studer G (1997) Maximum loss for risk measurement of portfolios. In: Zimmermann U, Derigs U, Gaul W, Möhring R, Schuster K-P (eds) Operations research proceedings 1996. Springer, Berlin, pp 386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansini R, Speranza G (2005) An exact approach for portfolio selection with transaction costs and rounds. IIE Trans 37: 919–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mansini R, Speranza MG (1999) Heuristic algorithms for the portfolio selection problem with minimum transaction lots. Eur J Oper Res 114: 219–233

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H (1952) Portfolio selection. J Financ 7: 77–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2: 21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

  • Speranza MG (1996) A heuristic algorithm for a portfolio optimization model applied to the milan stock market. Comput Oper Res 23: 433–441

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Young MR (1998) A minimax portfolio selection rule with linear programming solution. Manag Sci 44: 673–683

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norbert Trautmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baumann, P., Trautmann, N. Portfolio-optimization models for small investors. Math Meth Oper Res 77, 345–356 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-012-0408-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-012-0408-3

Keywords

Navigation