Abstract
In recent work Woodin has defined new axioms stronger than I0 (the existence of an elementary embedding j from L(V λ+1) to itself), that involve elementary embeddings between slightly larger models. There is a natural correspondence between I0 and determinacy, but to extend this correspondence in this new framework we must insist that these elementary embeddings are proper. While at first this seemed to be a common property, in this paper will be provided a model in which all such elementary embeddings are not proper. This result fills a gap in a theorem by Woodin and justifies the definition of properness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kafkoulis G.: Coding lemmata in L(V λ+1). Arch. Math. Logic 43, 193–213 (2004)
Kanamori A.: The Higher Infinite. Springer, Berlin (1994)
Kunen K.: Elementary embeddings and infinite combinatorics. J. Symb. Logic 3, 407–413 (1971)
Moschovakis, Y.N.: Descriptive set theory. In: Volume 100 of Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics. North Holland, Amsterdam–New York (1980)
Moschovakis, Y.N.: Determinacy and prewellorderings of the Continuum. In: Mathematical Logic and Foundations of Set Theory (Proc. Internat. Colloq., Jerusalem, 1968). pp. 24–62. North Holland, Amsterdam (1970)
Solovay, R.M.: The Independence of DC from AD. Cabal Seminar 76–77: Proceedings, Caltech-UCLA Logic Seminar 1976–77. Springer, Berlin (1978)
Steel, J.R.: Long games. In: Cabal Seminar 81–85: Proceedings, Caltech-UCLA Logic Seminar 1981–1985. Springer, Berlin (1988)
Woodin, H.: An AD-like axiom. Unpublished
Woodin, H.: Suitable extender sequences. Unpublished
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dimonte, V. Totally non-proper ordinals beyond L(V λ+1). Arch. Math. Logic 50, 565–584 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0232-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-011-0232-0