[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Sensitivity analysis of a two-plate coupled system in the statistical energy analysis (SEA) framework

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to perform design sensitivity analysis of two right angle coupled plates, connected by various joint connections, to determine an optimum coupling loss factor (CLF) using optimization in the statistical energy analysis (SEA) framework. The theoretical analysis of obtaining such optimum CLFs can be used during the design stage of a dynamic system to specify the right type of joint. First- and second-order sensitivity analysis using theoretical equations of CLFs of two right angle plates in the SEA framework, coupled to form welded, riveted, and bolted connections, is presented in the audible frequency range. These sensitivities were determined using both analytic (direct differentiation) and finite difference methods; the sensitivities computed by the analytic method agree well with the finite difference method, indicating that the direct differentiation method can be directly used to predict variation in the CLF and the corresponding response of coupled plates joined by various joint connections. The sensitivity analysis also gives a feasible region in terms of frequency range for the determination of optimum values of CLF by selecting the right type of joint at the design stage based on its stiffness. The study presented in this paper will be very useful at the drawing board stage of designing vibro-acoustic systems to reduce vibration or noise of such systems by giving a definite direction for the modification of design parameters, thus eliminating expensive experimentation; it will be helpful in arriving at the optimum values of CLF that would eventually reduce the vibro-acoustic response of dynamic systems with a large number of subsystems connected by welded, riveted, and bolted joints.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34
Fig. 35
Fig. 36
Fig. 37
Fig. 38
Fig. 39

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burkewitz B, Cohen L, Baran F (1994) Application of large scale SEA model to ship noise problem. NOISE-CON’94:697-701.

  • Campbell B, Abrishan M, Stokes W (1993) Structural acoustic analysis for the prediction of vehicle body acoustic sensitivities. SAE pPaper nNo. 93197.

  • Chavan AT, Manik DN (2010) Sensitivity analysis of vibro-acoustic systems in statistical energy analysis framework. Struct Multidisc Optim 40:283–306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Choi KK, Shim I, Wang S (1997) Design sensitivity analysis of structure-induced noise and vibration. J Vib Acoust 119:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordioli JA, Gerges SNY, Pererira AK, Carmo M, Grandi C (2004) Vibro-acoustic modeling of aircrafts using statistical energy analysis. SAE paper.

  • Cremer L, Heckl M, Ungar E (1973) Structure-borne sound. Spring, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cunefare KA, Koopman GH (1992) Acoustic design sensitivity for structural radiators. J Vib Acoust 114:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJong RG (2002) Optimization of noise control designs using SEA. Proceedings of the Second International AutoSEA Users Conference, Detroit-Troy Marriot-Troy, Michigan, USA.

  • Fritze D, Marburg S, Hardtke HJ (2005) FEM-BEM coupling and structural-acoustic sensitivity analysis for shell geometries. Comput StructComputer Struct 83:143–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hambric SA (1995) Approximate techniques for broadband acoustic radiated noise design optimization problems. J Vib Acoust 117:136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hynna P, Klinge P, Vuoksinen J (1995) Prediction of structure-borne sound transmission in large welded ship structures using statistical energy analysis. J Sound Vib 180:583–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JO, Janssen JH (1997) Calculation of structure born noise transmission in ships using statistical energy analysis approach. Proceedings in International Symposium on Ship Board Acoustic.

  • Kaminsky C, Unglenieks R (1997) Statistical energy analysis of noise and vibration from an automotive engine. SAE paper.

  • Kane JH, Mauo S, Everstine GC (1991) A boundary element formulation for acoustic shape sensitivity analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 90:561–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim NH, Dong J, Choi KK, Vlahopoulos N, Ma Z-D, Castanier M, Pierre C (2003) Design sensitivity analysis for sequential structural-acoustic problems. J Sound Vib 263:569–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim NH, Dong J, Choi KK (2004) Energy flow analysis and design sensitivity of structural problems at high frequencies. J Sound Vib 269:213–250

  • Koo BU (1997) Shape design sensitivity analysis of acoustic problems using a boundary element method. Comput StructComputer Struct 65:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu LKH (1987) Optimum damping selection by statistical energy analysis. Statistical energy analysis winter annual meeting, Boston, MA., pp 9–14.

  • Lyon RH, DeJong RG (1995) Theory and applications of statistical energy analysis, 2nd edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma ZD, Hagiwara I (1991a) Sensitivity analysis methods for coupled acoustic-structural systems part I. Modal sensitivities. AIAAJ 29:1787–1795

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ma ZD, Hagiwara I (1991b) Sensitivity analysis methods for coupled acoustic-structural systems part II. Direct frequency response and its sensitivities. AIAAJ 29:1795–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VR, Faulkner LL (1983) Prediction of aircraft interior noise using the statistical energy analysis. J Vib Acoust Stress Reliab Des 105:512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil VH, Manik DN (2015) Determination of coupling loss factor (CLF) for right angled plates. 22nd International Conference on Sound and Vibration, Milan, Italy, July 12-16, 2015.

  • Powell RE. (1995) Design sensitivity analysis of statistical energy analysis models. SAE paper.

  • Radcliffe CJ, Huang XL (1997) Putting statistics into the statistical energy analysis of automotive vehicles. J Vib Acoust 119:629–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigo GA, Klein M, Borello G (1994) Vibro-acoustic analysis of manned space craft using SEA. NOISE-CON’94.

  • Salagame RR, Belegundu AD, Koopman GH (1995) Analytical sensitivity of acoustic power radiated from plates. J Vib Acoust 117:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarpa F (2000) Parametric sensitivity analysis of coupled acoustic-structural systems. J Vib Acoust 122:109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DC, Bernhard RJ (1992) Computation of acoustic shape design sensitivity using boundary element method. J Vib Acoust 114:127–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel JA (1996) The prediction of structural vibration transmission through a motor vehicle using statistical energy analysis. J Vib Acoust 197:691–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh SJ, Simpson G, Lalor N (1990) A computer system to predict internal noise in motor cars using ststistical energy analysis. Proceedings of inter-noise 90, Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 961-964.

  • Wang S, Choi KK, Kulkarni H (1994) Acousical optimization of vehicle passenger space. SAE paper no. 941075.

  • Zhang ZD, Raveendra ST (2003) Sound power sensitivity analysis and design optimization using BEM. SAE paper.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Cummins, India, Ltd, Pume, Maharashtra, India

    Vinayak H. Patil

  2. IIT Bombay Mumbai, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

    Dhanesh N. Manik

Authors
  1. Vinayak H. Patil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dhanesh N. Manik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dhanesh N. Manik.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: W. H. Zhang

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The mathematical model for determination of theoretical CLF of right angle coupled plates connected by various joint connections (as shown in Fig. 1) is presented by authors Patil and Manik (2015).

The bending wave transmission efficiency (τ12) used in (12) is obtained from the developed mathematical model as

$$ {\tau}_{12}= X\psi {\left|{t}_B\right|}^2 $$
(34)

where

$$ {t}_B=\frac{2\left[{Z}_1+{\beta}_1+{Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right]-2j\left[1-\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)\right]}{D} $$
(35)
$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}D=X\left\{-1+j-2\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)-\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)-\left(1+j\right)\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)\right\}\\ {}+\psi \left\{-1+j-\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)-2\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)-\left(1+j\right)\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)\right\}\\ {}+\psi {Z}_3\left\{-\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)+2j-\left(1-j\right)\left({Z}_1+{\beta}_1\right)-\left(1-j\right)\left({Z}_2+{\beta}_2\right)\right\}.\end{array}} $$
(36)

in (34) to (36)

X = kb2/kb1; \( \psi =\frac{k_{b2}^2{B}_{s2}}{k_{b1}^2{B}_{s1}} \); β1 = (m2CB2)/(m1CL1); β2 = (m1CB1)/(m2CL2);where

m1, m2 are the mass of two plates, kb1, kb2 are the wave numbers in two plates, Bs1, Bs2 are the bending stiffness of two plates, CB1, CB2 are the bending wave speeds in two plates, and CL1, CL2 are the longitudinal wave speeds in two plates (Cremer et al. (1973)).

Here,

$$ {\displaystyle \begin{array}{l}{Z}_1={m}_2{C}_{B2}/\left(\left({K}_1/ j\omega \right)+{c}_1\right)\\ {}{Z}_2={m}_1{C}_{B1}/\left(\left({K}_2/ j\omega \right)+{c}_2\right)\\ {}{Z}_3={B}_{s1}/{C}_{B1}\left(\left({K}_3/ j\omega \right)+{c}_3\right)\end{array}} $$
(37)

In (37), K1, K2 are the linear stiffness values and K3 is a rotational stiffness. Similarly, c1, c2 are the linear damping values and c3 is a rotational damping.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patil, V.H., Manik, D.N. Sensitivity analysis of a two-plate coupled system in the statistical energy analysis (SEA) framework. Struct Multidisc Optim 59, 201–228 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2061-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-018-2061-9

Keywords