Abstract
Reliability sensitivity analysis is used to find the rate of change in the probability of failure (or reliability) due to the changes in distribution parameters such as the means and standard deviations. Most of the existing reliability sensitivity analysis methods assume that all the probabilities and distribution parameters are precisely known. That is, every statistical parameter involved is perfectly determined. However, there are two types of uncertainties, epistemic and aleatory uncertainties that may not be perfectly determined in engineering practices. In this paper, both epistemic and aleatory uncertainties are considered in reliability sensitivity analysis and modeled using P-boxes. The proposed method is based on Monte Carlo simulation (MCS), weighted regression, interval algorithm and first order reliability method (FORM). We linearize original non-linear limit-state function by MCS rather than by expansion as a first order Taylor series at most probable point (MPP) because the MPP search is an iterative optimization process. Finally, we introduce an optimization model for sensitivity analysis under both aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Four numerical examples are presented to demonstrate the proposed method.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Au SK (2005) Reliability-based design sensitivity by efficient simulation. Comput Struct 83(14):1048–1061
Aughenbaugh JM, Herrmann JW (2009) Information management for estimating system reliability using imprecise probabilities and precise Bayesian updating. Int J Reliab Saf 3(1–3):35–56
Christophe S, Philippe W (2009) Evidential networks for reliability analysis and performance evaluation of systems with imprecise knowledge. IEEE Trans Reliab 58(1):69–87
De-Lataliade A, Blanco S, Clergent Y et al. (2002) Monte Carlo method and sensitivity estimations. J Quant Spectrosc Radiat Transfer 75(5):529–538
Ditlevsen O, Madsen HO (2007) Structural reliability methods. Wiley, Chichester
Du X (2005) Probabilistic engineering design: Chart 7 (unpublished)
Du X (2008) Unified uncertainty analysis by the first order reliability method. J Mech Des Trans ASME 130(9):1–10
Du L (2010) Research on system reliability under epistemic uncertainty. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu
Du X, Sudjianto A, Huang BQ (2005) Reliability-based design with the mixture of random and interval variables. J Mech Des Trans ASME 127(6):1068–1076
Du L, Choi KK, Young BD et al. (2006) Possibility-based design optimization method for design problems with both statistical and fuzzy input data. J Mech Des Trans ASME 128(4):928–935
Ferson S, Tucker WT (2006a) Sensitivity in risk analyses with uncertain numbers. Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, SAND2006-2801
Ferson S, Tucker WT (2006b) Sensitivity analysis using probability bounding. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10–11):1435–1442
Ghosh R, Chakraborty S, Bhattacharyya B (2001) Stochastic sensitivity analysis of structures using first-order perturbation. Meccanica 36(3):291–296
Guo J, Du X (2007) Sensitivity analysis with mixture of epistemic and aleatory uncertainties. AIAA J 45(9):2337–2349
Guo J, Du X (2009) Reliability sensitivity analysis with random and interval variables. Int J Numer Method Eng 78(13):1585–1617
Haldar A, Mahadevan S (2001) Probability, reliability, and statistical methods in engineering design. Wiley, Chichester
Hall JW (2006) Uncertainty-based sensitivity indices for imprecise probability distributions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91(10–11):1443–1451
Hohenbichler M, Gollwitzer S, Kruse W et al. (1987) New light on first and second order reliability methods. Struct Saf 4(4):267–284
Huang BQ, Du X (2006) Uncertainty analysis by dimension reduction integration and saddlepoint approximations. J Mech Des Trans ASME 128(1):26–33
Huang HZ, He L (2008) New approaches to system analysis and design: a review. In: Misra KB (ed) Handbook of performability engineering. Springer, New York, pp 477–498
Huang HZ, Zhang X (2009) Design optimization with discrete and continuous variables of aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. J Mech Des Trans ASME 131(3):031006-1–031006-8
Karanki DR, Kushwaha HS, Verma AK et al. (2009) Uncertainty analysis based on probability bounds (P-Box) approach in probabilistic safety assessment. Risk Anal 29(5):662–675
Kaymaz I, Mcmahon CA (2005) A response surface method based on weighted regression for structural reliability analysis. Probab Eng Mech 20(1):11–17
Kiureghian AD (2008) Analysis of structural reliability under parameter uncertainties. Probab Eng Mech 23(4):351–358
Kiureqhian AD, Ditlevsen O (2009) Aleatory or epistemic? Does it matter? Struct Saf 31(2):105–112
Koduru SD, Haukaas T (2010) Feasibility of FORM in finite element reliability analysis. Struct Saf 32(1):145–153
Kokkolaras M, Mourelatos ZP, Papalambros PY (2006) Impact of uncertainty quantification on design: an engine optimization case study. Int J Reliab Saf 1(1–2):225–237
Liu H, Chen W, Sudjianto A (2006) Relative entropy based method for global and regional sensitivity analysis in probabilistic design. J Mech Des Trans ASME 128(2):326–336
Melchers RE (1999) Structural reliability analysis and prediction, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York
Melchers RE, Ahammed M (2004) A fast approximate method for parameter sensitivity estimation in Monte Carlo structural reliability. Comput Struct 82(1):55–61
Merlet JP (2009) Interval analysis and reliability in robotics. Int J Reliab Saf 3(1–3):104–130
Mundstok DC, Marczak RJ (2009) Boundary element sensitivity evaluation for elasticity problems using complex variable method. Struct Multidisc Optim 38(4):423–428
Nikolaidis E, Chen Q, Cudney H et al. (2004) Comparison of probability and possibility for design against catastrophic failure under uncertainty. J Mech Des Trans ASME 126(3):386–394
Rahman S, Wei D (2008) Design sensitivity and reliability-based structural optimization by univariate decomposition. Struct Multidisc Optim 35(3):245–261
Tanrioven M, Wu QH, Turner DR et al. (2004) A new approach to real-time reliability analysis of transmission system using fuzzy Markov model. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 26(10):821–832
Tucker WT, Ferson S (2003) Probability bounds analysis in environmental risk assessment. Applied biomathematics. Setauket, New York
Utkin LV, Destercke S (2009) Computing expectations with continuous p-boxes: Univariate case. Int J Approximate Reasoning 50(5):778–798
Wang HJ, Chen HJ, Bao C et al. (2006) Engineering examples of ANSYS. China Water Power Press, Beijing
Xing YJ, Arora JS, Abdel-malck K (2009) Optimization-based motion prediction of mechanical system: sensitivity analysis. Struct Multidisc Optim 37(6):595–608
Zhang X, Huang HZ (2010) Sequential optimization and reliability assessment for multidisciplinary design optimization under aleatory and epistemic uncertainties. Struct Multidisc Optim 40(1):165–175
Zhang X, Zhang XL, Huang HZ, Wang Z, Zeng S (2010a) Possibility-based multidisciplinary design optimization in the framework of sequential optimization and reliability assessment. Int J Innovative Comput Inf Control 6(11):5287–5297
Zhang X, Huang HZ, Xu H (2010b) Multidisciplinary design optimization with discrete and continuous variables of various uncertainties. Struct Multidisc Optim 42(4):605–618
Zhou J, Mourelatos ZP (2008) A sequential algorithm for possibility-based design optimization. J Mech Des Trans ASME 130(1):11001–11011
Acknowledgements
This research was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under the contract number 51075061 and the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China under the contract number 20090185110019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xiao, NC., Huang, HZ., Wang, Z. et al. Reliability sensitivity analysis for structural systems in interval probability form. Struct Multidisc Optim 44, 691–705 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0652-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00158-011-0652-9