Abstract
Leaf beetles are able to climb on smooth and rough surfaces using arrays of micron-sized adhesive hairs (setae) of varying morphology. We report the first in vivo adhesive force measurements of individual setae in the beetle Gastrophysa viridula, using a smooth polystyrene substrate attached to a glass capillary micro-cantilever. The beetles possess three distinct adhesive pads on each leg which differ in function and setal morphology. Visualisation of pull-offs allowed forces to be measured for each tarsal hair type. Male discoidal hairs adhered with the highest forces (919 ± 104 nN, mean ± SE), followed by spatulate (582 ± 59 nN) and pointed (127 ± 19 nN) hairs. Discoidal hairs were stiffer in the normal direction (0.693 ± 0.111 N m−1) than spatulate (0.364 ± 0.039 N m−1) or pointed (0.192 ± 0.044 N m−1) hairs. The greater adhesion on smooth surfaces and the higher stability of discoidal hairs help male beetles to achieve strong adhesion on the elytra of females during copulation. A comparison of pull-off forces measured for single setae and whole pads (arrays) revealed comparable levels of adhesive stress. This suggests that beetles are able to achieve equal load sharing across their adhesive pads so that detachment through peeling is prevented.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arzt E, Gorb S, Spolenak R (2003) From micro to nano contacts in biological attachment devices. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10603–10606
Autumn K, Liang YA, Hsieh ST, Zesch W, Chan WP, Kenny TW, Fearing R, Full RJ (2000) Adhesive force of a single gecko foot-hair. Nature 405:681–685
Autumn K, Peattie AM (2002) Mechanisms of adhesion in geckos. Integr Comp Biol 42:1081–1090
Autumn K, Dittmore A, Santos D, Spenko M, Cutkosky M (2006a) Frictional adhesion: a new angle on gecko attachment. J Exp Biol 209:3569–3579
Autumn K, Hansen W (2006) Ultrahydrophobicity indicates a non-adhesive default state in gecko setae. J Comp Physiol A 192:1205–1212
Autumn K, Hsieh ST, Dudek DM, Chen J, Chitaphan C, Full RJ (2006b) Dynamics of geckos running vertically. J Exp Biol 209:260–272
Autumn K, Majidi C, Groff RE, Dittmore A, Fearing R (2006c) Effective elastic modulus of isolated gecko setal arrays. J Exp Biol 209:3558–3568
Autumn K, Gravish N (2008) Gecko adhesion: evolutionary nanotechnology. Philos T Roy Soc A 366:1575–1590
Betz O (2003) Structure of the tarsi in some Stenus species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae): external morphology, ultrastructure, and tarsal secretion. J Morphol 255:24–43
Bullock J, Drechsler P, Federle W (2008) Comparison of smooth and hairy attachment pads in insects: friction, adhesion and mechanisms for direction-dependence. J Exp Biol 211:3333–3343
Bullock JMR, Federle W (2009) Division of labour and sex differences between fibrillar, tarsal adhesive pads in beetles: effective elastic modulus and attachment performance. J Exp Biol 212:1876–1888
Clemente CJ, Federle W (2008) Pushing versus pulling: division of labour between tarsal attachment pads in cockroaches. Proc R Soc B 275:1329–1336
Clemente CJ, Beale A, Bullock JMR, Federle W (2010) Evidence for self-cleaning in fluid-based smooth and hairy adhesive systems of insects. J Exp Biol 213:635–642
del Campo A, Greiner C, Arzt E (2007) Contact shape controls adhesion of bioinspired fibrillar surfaces. Langmuir 23:10235–10243
Drechsler P, Federle W (2006) Biomechanics of smooth adhesive pads in insects: influence of tarsal secretion on attachment performance. J Comp Physiol A 192:1213–1222
Eimüller T, Guttmann P, Gorb SN (2008) Terminal contact elements of insect attachment devices studied by transmission X-ray microscopy. J Exp Biol 211:1958–1963
Federle W, Riehle M, Curtis ASG, Full RJ (2002) An integrative study of insect adhesion: mechanics and wet adhesion of pretarsal pads in ants. Integr Comp Biol 42:1100–1106
Federle W (2006) Why are so many adhesive pads hairy? J Exp Biol 209:2611–2621
Gao H, Wang X, Yao H, Gorb S, Arzt E (2005) Mechanics of hierarchical adhesion structures of geckos. Mech Mater 37:275–285
Geiselhardt SF, Geiselhardt S, Peschke K (2009) Comparison of tarsal and cuticular chemistry in the leaf beetle Gastrophysa viridula (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) and an evaluation of solid-phase microextraction and solvent extraction techniques. Chemoecology 19:185–193
Gorb E, Gorb S (2009) Effects of surface topography and chemistry of Rumex obtusifolius leaves on the attachment of the beetle Gastrophysa viridula. Entom Exp Appl 130:222–228
Gorb SN, Varenberg M (2007) Mushroom-shaped geometry of contact elements in biological adhesive systems. J Adhes Sci Technol 21:1175–1183
Gravish N, Wilkinson M, Autumn K (2008) Frictional and elastic energy in gecko adhesive detachment. J R Soc Interface 5:339–348
Hansen WR, Autumn K (2005) Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:385–389
Hedrick TL (2008) Software techniques for two- and three-dimensional kinematic measurements of biological and biomimetic systems. Bioinspir Biomim 3:034001
Huber G, Gorb SN, Spolenak R, Arzt E (2005) Resolving the nanoscale adhesion of individual gecko spatulae by atomic force microscopy. Biol Lett 1:2–4
Hui C-Y, Glassmaker NJ, Tang T, Jagota A (2004) Design of biomimetic fibrillar interfaces: 2. Mechanics of enhanced adhesion. J R Soc Interface 1:35–48
Jiao Y, Gorb S, Scherge M (2000) Adhesion measured on the attachment pads of Tettigonia viridissima (Orthoptera, Insecta). J Exp Biol 203:1887–1895
Kaelble DH (1960) Theory and analysis of peel adhesion: bond stresses and distributions. Trans Soc Rheol 4:45–73
Kesel AB, Martin A, Seidl T (2004) Getting a grip on spider attachment: an AFM approach to microstructure adhesion in arthropods. Smart Mater Struct 13:512–518
Majidi CS, Groff RE, Fearing RS (2005) Attachment of fiber array adhesive through side contact. J Appl Phys 98:103521
Murphy MP, Aksak B, Sitti M (2007) Adhesion and anisotropic friction enhancements of angled heterogeneous micro-fiber arrays with spherical and spatula tips. J Adhes Sci Technol 21:1281–1296
Pelletier Y, Smilowitz Z (1987) Specialized tarsal hairs on adult male Colorado potato beetles, Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say), hamper its locomotion on smooth surfaces. Can Entomol 119:1139–1142
Persson BNJ, Gorb S (2003) The effect of surface roughness on the adhesion of elastic plates with application to biological systems. J Chem Phys 119:11437–11444
Spolenak R, Gorb S, Gao H, Arzt E (2004) Effects of contact shape on the scaling of biological attachments. Proc R Soc Lond A 460:1–15
Spuskanyuk AV, McMeeking RM, Deshpande VS, Arzt E (2008) The effect of shape on the adhesion of fibrillar surfaces. Acta Biomater 4:1669–1676
Stork NE (1980a) A scanning electron microscope study of tarsal adhesive setae in the Coleoptera. Zool J LinnSoc 68:173–306
Stork NE (1980b) Experimental analysis of adhesion of Chrysolina polita (Chrysomelidae: Coleoptera) on a variety of surfaces. J Exp Biol 88:91–107
Vincent JFV, Wegst UGK (2004) Design and mechanical properties of insect cuticle. Arthropod Struct Devel 33:187–199
Voigt D, Schuppert JM, Dattinger S, Gorb SN (2008) Sexual dimorphism in the attachment ability of the Colorado potato beetle Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) to rough substrates. J Insect Physiol 54:765–776
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bullock, J.M.R., Federle, W. Beetle adhesive hairs differ in stiffness and stickiness: in vivo adhesion measurements on individual setae. Naturwissenschaften 98, 381–387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0781-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0781-4