[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Non-swarm-based computational approach for mining cancer drug target modules in protein interaction network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cancer is a lethal disease that drew the entire world over the past decades. Currently, numerous researches focused on these cancer treatments. Most familiar among them is the targeted therapy; a customized treatment type depends on the cancer drug targets. Further, the selection of targets is a quite sensitive task. The computational approaches are lagging in this field. This paper is intended to propose an optimized multi-functional score–based co-clustering with MapReduce (MR-CoCopt) approach for drug target module mining with optimal functional score set selection. This approach uses biological functional measures for co-clustering, MapReduce framework for handling redundant modules and complex protein interaction network (PIN), and non-swarm intelligence algorithm-bladderworts suction for optimal functional score set selection. It extracts the cancer-specific drug target modules in protein interaction networks. The protein complex coverage of the results is compared with the existing approach. The biological significance of the results is analyzed for the presence of cancer drug targets and drug target characteristics. From these results, novel cancer drug target modules are suggested for the targeted therapy and the active pharmaceutical drugs for these modules are also highlighted.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Freely available online.

Code availability

The code will be uploaded online soon.

References

  1. Hase T, Kikuchi K, Ghosh S, Kitano H, Tanaka H (2014) Identification of drug-target modules in the human protein-protein interaction network, in International Symposium on Artificial Life and Robotics. Beppu, Oita

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gowri R, Rathipriya R (2022) Functional module mining in protein interaction networks using co-clustering, in Intelligent IoT systems for big data analysis: concepts, applications, challenges, and future scope. Apple Academic Press (in printing)

  3. Szklarczyk D, Gable A, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva N, Morris J, Bork P, Jensen L, Mering Cv (2019) STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acid Res 47(D1):607–613

  4. Giurgiu M, Reinhard J, Brauner B, Dunger-Kaltenbach I, Fobo G, Frishman G, Montrone C, Ruepp A (2018) CORUM: a comprehensive resource of mammalian protein complexes. Nucleic Acid Res 47(Database Issue):D559–D563

  5. Zheng CJ, Han LY, Yap CW, Ji ZL, Cao ZW, Chen YZ (2006) Therapeutic targets: progress of their exploration and investigation of their characteristics. Pharmacol Rev 58(2):259–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bader GD, Hogue CW (2003) An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks. BMC Bioinformatics 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-4-2

  7. Jb P-L, Aj E, Ca O (2003) Detection of functional modules from protein interaction networks, Proteins: Structure. Function, and Bioinformatics 54(1):49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Stefan Pinkert, Jorg Schultz, Jorg Reichardt, (2010) Protein interaction networks—more than mere modules. PLoS Comput Biol 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000659

  9. Zhang Y, Zeng E, Li T, Narasimhan G (2009) Weighted consensus clustering for identifying functional modules in protein-protein interaction networks, in International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, USA, IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLA.2009.94

  10. Henriques R, Madeira SC (2016) BicNET: Flexible module discovery in large-scale biological networks using biclustering. Algorithms Mol Biol 11:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13015-016-0074-8

  11. Li J, Zhao PX (2018) Mining functional modules in heterogeneous biological networks using multiplex PageRank approach. Front Plant Sci 7(903):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  12. Liu W, Maa L, Jeonc B, Chena L, Chen B (2018) A network hierarchy-based method for functional module detection in protein-protein interaction networks. J Theor Biol 455:26–38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mao Y-M, Liu Y-P (2020) Functional module mining in uncertain PPI network based on fuzzy spectral clustering. J Comput 31(4):91–106

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wang C, Zhao N, Sun K, Zhang Y (2020) A cancer gene module mining method based on bio-network of multi-omics gene groups. Frontiers in Oncology, Methods 10:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gowri R, Rathipriya R (2018) Cohesive sub-network mining in protein interaction network using score based co-clustering with MapReduce model, advances in BigData and cloud computing, advances in intelligent systems and computing. Springer, pp 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-7200-0_20

  16. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, Jensen L (2013) STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acid Res 41(Database issue):D808-15. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1094

  17. Spirin V, Mirny LA (2013) Protein complexes and functional modules in the molecular networks. PNAS 100(21):12123–12128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohnishi K, Fujiwara A, Koeppen M (2016) Non-swarm intelligence search algorithm based on the foraging behaviors of fruit flies, in 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). Vancouver, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gowri R, Rathipriya R (2018) Non-swarm plant intelligence algorithm: bladderworts suction (BWS) algorithm, in ICCSDET. Kottayam, Kerala

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gowri R, Rathipriya R (2016) Venus flytrap optimization, in Computational intelligence, cyber security, and computational models. Springer, Singapore, pp 519–531

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ibrahim MH (2021) ODBOT: outlier detection-based oversampling technique for imbalanced datasets learning. Neural Comput Appl 33:15781–15806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-06198-x, 1–26

  22. Chordia N, Lakhawat K, Kumar A (2017) Identification of drug-target properties and its validation on Helicobacter pylori. Can J Biotechnol 1(1):44–49. https://doi.org/10.24870/cjb.2017-000101

  23. Feng Y, Wang Q, Wang T (2017) Drug target protein-protein interaction networks: a systematic perspective. BioMed Res Int 2017:1289259. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1289259

  24. Kim B, Jo J, Han J, Park C, Lee H (2017) In silico re-identification of properties of drug target proteins. BMC Bioinformatics 18(7):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bakheet TM, Doig AJ (2009) Properties and identification of human protein drug target. Bioinformatics 25(4):451–457

  26. Gashaw I, Ellinghaus P, Sommer A, Asadullah K (2011) What makes a good drug target?, Drug Discovery Today- Elsevier, 1037–1043

  27. Preissner R, Gohlke B, Otto R, Nickel J, Dunkel M (2015) CancerResource—updated database of cancer-relevant proteins, mutations and interacting drugs. Nucleic Acid Res 44(D1):D932–D937

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. American_Cancer_Society, Targeted drug therapy for liver cancer: Sorafenib, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.cancer.org/cancer/liver-cancer/treating/targeted-therapy.html. Accessed May 2020

  29. Vafadar A, Shabaninejad Z, Movahedpour A, Fallahi F, Taghavipour M, Ghasemi Y, Akbar M, Shafiee A, Hajighadimi S, Moradizarmehri S, Razi E, Savardashtaki A, Mirzaei H (2020) Quercetin and cancer: new insights into its therapeutic effects on ovarian cancer cells. Cell Biosci 10(32). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-020-00397-0

  30. Okasha RM, Alblewi FF, Afifi TH, Naqvi A, Fouda AM, Al-Dies A-AM, El-Agrody AM (2017) Design of new Benzo[h]chromene derivatives: antitumor activities and structure-activity relationships of the 2,3-positions and fused rings at the 2,3-positions,". Molecules 22(3):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu J, Qin B, Moyer AM, Nowsheen S, Liu T, Qin S, Zhuang Y, Liu D, Lu SW, Kalari KR, Visscher DW, Copland JA, McLaughlin SA, Moreno-Aspitia A, Northfelt DW, Gray RJ (2018) DNA methyltransferase expression in triple-negative breast cancer predicts sensitivity to decitabine. J Clin Invest 128(6):2376–2388. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI97924

  32. Saraiva SM, Gutiérrez-Lovera C, Martínez-Val J, Lores S, Bouzo BL, Díez-Villares S, Alijas S, Pensado-López A, Vázquez-Ríos AJ, Sánchez L, de la Fuente M (2021) Edelfosine nanoemulsions inhibit tumor growth of triple negative breast cancer in zebrafish xenograft model. Sci Rep 11:9873. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-87968-4

  33. Imatinib Mesylate, National Cancer Institute, December 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/treatment/drugs/imatinibmesylate, Accessed May 2020

  34. "Doxorubicin," 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/cancer-drugs/drugs/doxorubicin, Accessed May 2020

  35. Gowri R, Rathipriya R (2017) Score based co-clustering for binary data. Int J Comput Intell anf Inform 7(2):105–111

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The first author received financial support from the UGC for her research under the UGC NET JRF (Student Id: 3384/(OBC)(NET JULY-2016)) Scheme.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, Periyar University, Tamilnadu, Salem, India

    R. Gowri & R. Rathipriya

Authors
  1. R. Gowri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. R. Rathipriya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All the authors have an equal contribution.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Rathipriya.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

The authors agree to participate in this research work publication.

Consent for publication

The authors agree to publish in this journal.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gowri, R., Rathipriya, R. Non-swarm-based computational approach for mining cancer drug target modules in protein interaction network. Med Biol Eng Comput 60, 1947–1976 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02574-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-022-02574-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation