Single parameter indices and bibliometric outliers

• De Visscher, A. (2011). What does the g-index really measure? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2290–2293.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes to science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: A brief review. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 161(8), 979–980.

  Google Scholar 

• Garfield, E. (2005). The agony and the ecstasy: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. In International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication. Retrieved Oct 15, 2013 from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/jifchicago2005.pdf.

• Glänzel, W. (2009). The multi-dimensionality of journal impact. Scientometrics, 78(2), 355–374.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W. (2013a). High-end performance or outlier? Evaluating the tail of scientometric distribution. Scientometrics, 97(1), 13–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W. (2013b). The application of citation-based performance classes in disciplinary and multidisciplinary assessment. In J. Gorraiz, E. Schiebel, Ch. Gumpenberger, M. Hörlesberger, & H. F. Moed (Eds.), Proceedings of ISSI 2013—The 14th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna, Austria (Vol. I, pp. 109–122).

• Glanzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2013). Opinion paper: thoughts and facts on bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 96(1), 381–394.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Glänzel, W., Thijs, B., Debackere, K. (2013). The application of citation-based performance classes in institutional research assessment. In S. Hinze, A. Lottmann (Eds.), Translational Twists and Turns: Science as a Socio-Economic Endeavour, Proceedings of STI 2013 Berlin (18th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators) (pp. 122–129).

• Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Vol. 102, no. 46, pp. 16569–16572).

• Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2012). Comments on a critique of the Thomson Reuters journal impact factor. Scientometrics, 92(2), 395–401.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2010a). Is there a place for a mock h-index? Scientometrics, 84, 153–165.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2010b). The 100 most prolific economists using the p-index. Scientometrics, 84, 167–172.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2011a). The energy–exergy–entropy (or EEE) sequences in bibliometric assessment. Scientometrics, 87, 515–524.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2011b). Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—Toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics, 88, 555–562.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2013a). The Zynergy-index and the formula for the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23046.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2013b). Quantity, quality, and consistency as bibliometric indicators. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23008.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

• Prathap, G. (2013c). Measures for impact, consistency, and the h- and g-indices. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. doi:10.1002/asi.23028.

  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references