[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Single Particle Fault Injection Signal Generation Method Using Gaussian Cloud Model

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the traditional single particle fault injection experiments (SPFIE), when the target configuration register for fault injection is selected, the state of the configuration register is inverted directly without considering the actual operating environment of the target design, such as the distribution of particles around the orbit, the crash frequency of particles on the target design and the electronic characteristics of the design itself. So, the soft failure rate obtained based on this method cannot properly reflect the actual situation of the target design in a specific space environment. To address this issue, this work presents a fault injection signal generation method considering both particle distribution in space and the circuit electronic characteristics. Because the real particle distribution data is less and the information contained is single, a novel data expansion method based on the Gaussian cloud model is proposed. This method makes full use of small sample information and the expanded data using this method maintain the same distribution as the original sample data with more information. We take the particle data collected by the detector mounted on Tiangong-1 as the simulation scenario to validate this novel expansion method. Simulation results demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed expansion method. The SPFIE using the proposed fault injection signal generation method improves the authenticity of the experiment results and the SRAM FPGA design soft failure rate estimated according to experiment result is closer to the real situation in the space environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Juan J, Rodríguez-Andina MD, Valdés-Peña, and María J. Moure, (2015) Advanced Features and Industrial Applications of FPGAs-A Review. IEEE Trans Industr Inform 11(4):853–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Battezzati N, Sterpone L, Violante M (2011) Reconfigurable Field Programmable Gate Arrays for Mission-Critical Applications. Springer, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Villalta I, Bidarte U, Gómez-Cornejo J, Lázaro J, Cuadrado C (2015) Dependability in FPGAs, a Review. In: Proc of 2015 Conference on Design of Circuits and Integrated Systems (DCIS), pp 1–6

  4. Tamimi S, Ebrahimi Z, Khaleghi B, Asadi H (2019) An Efficient SRAM-Based Reconfigurable Architecture for Embedded Processors. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 38(3):466–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang C (1998) The influence of single-particle effect on the reliability of satellite space operation. Semicond Inf 35(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. He W, Wang Y, Xing K, Yang J (2016) Modeling and Experimental Study of Soft Error Propagation Based on Cellular Automaton. Math Probl Eng 2016:1–11

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Luo W, Liu J, Li Z, Song J (2020) Efficient Triangular Interpolation Methods: Error Analysis and Applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel Propag Lett 19(6):1032–1036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ashraf I, Hur S, Park Y (2017) An Investigation of Interpolation Techniques to Generate 2D Intensity Image from LIDAR Data. IEEE Access 5:8250–8260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Akins RB, Tolson H, Cole BR (2005) Stability of response characteristics of a Delphi panel: application of bootstrap data expansion. BMC Med Res Methodol 5(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peter AD, Eulogio PI, Juan JE (2015) The total bootstrap median: a robust and efficient estimator of location and scale for small samples. J Appl Stat 42(6):1306–1321

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Marieke ET, Cajo JF, Ter B (2008) Bootstrap confidence intervals for principal response curves. Comput Stat Data Anal 52(4):1837–1849

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu yun-jie, Wang Jianmin, Yang Wenguang, (2016) Approach of credibility evaluation for testing system with small samples. J Beijing University Aeronautics Astronautics 42(9):1911–1917

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhang Q, Yuan Q, Zeng C, Li X, Wei Y (2018) Missing Data Reconstruction in Remote Sensing Image with a Unified Spatial-Temporal-Spectral Deep Convolutional Neural Network. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 56(8):4274–4288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhixin J, Hongbin Z, Anmin Xi (2011) Expanding reliability data of NC machine tool based on neural network. J Jilin University (Eng Technol Ed) 41(2):403–407

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng H, Long F, Suge Y, Liquan L (2009) A Monte Carlo-based Control Signal Generator for Single Event Effect (SEE) Fault Injection. In: Proc of 2009 European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems, pp 247–251

  16. Zhi-hu YU, Yu-feng QI (2010) A Data Filling Algorithm Based on Cloud Model. Comput Technol Dev 20(12):34–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang J, Wang J (2020) Credibility evaluation for small sample data based on Grey system theory and cloud model. J Grey Syst

  18. Raj D, Gupta A, Garg B, Tanna K, Rhee FC (2018) Analysis of Data Generated from Multidimensional Type-1 and Type-2 Fuzzy Membership Functions. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26(2):681–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang Y, Zheng L, Zhang H, Zheng WX (2020) Fuzzy Observer-Based Repetitive Tracking Control for Nonlinear Systems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 28(10):2401–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Li HX, Wang PZ (1994) Fuzzy mathematics.2nd ed. Beijing, China: National Defense Industry Press, ch.1, sec. 5, pp.20–21

  21. De-yi Li, Chang-yu L (2004) On the Universality of the Normal Cloud Model. Eng Sci 6(8):28–34

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhou S, Shi-qian X (2001)Probability theory and mathematical statistics.3rd ed. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press, ch.2, sec.4, pp 61–62

  23. Li DY, Du Y (2014) Artificial intelligence with uncertainty,2nd ed. Beijing, China: National Defense Industry Press, ch.2, sec.2, pp 44–45

  24. Ling-zhou Q (2014) Study on Extraction Technology of SRAM SEU Effect Parameters Based on SOI CMOS, Master's Thesis, Xidian University. Xi’an, China

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100049, China

    Mengru Wang & Jinbo Wang

  2. Technology and Engineering Center for Space Utilization, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing, 100094, China

    Mengru Wang, Jinbo Wang, Jianmin Wang & Shan Zhou

Authors
  1. Mengru Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinbo Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jianmin Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinbo Wang.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: C.-W. Wu.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, M., Wang, J., Wang, J. et al. Single Particle Fault Injection Signal Generation Method Using Gaussian Cloud Model. J Electron Test 37, 127–140 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-021-05928-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-021-05928-2

Index Terms

Search

Navigation