Abstract
This work investigates the robustness of optimal decision rules under a changing size of a decision group where the competence of one member is outstanding while the others possess an identical competence. More specifically, we focus on the expert rule, the almost expert rule and the tie-breaking chairperson rule. We first establish criteria for the optimality of each of these rules and then use it to investigate their robustness. Robustness is an important property of decision rules, especially when cost of adjustment to a new rule is high. Our findings are that the expert rule and the chairperson rule are robust while the almost expert rule is not.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Karotkin D (1998) The network of weighted majority rules and weighted majority games. Games Econ Behav 22:299–315
Karotkin D, Nitzan S, Paroush J (1988) The essential ranking of decision rules in small panels of experts. Theory Decis 24:243–268
Nitzan S, Paroush J (1982) Optimal decision rules in uncertain dichotomous choice situation. Int Econ Rev 23:289–297
Nitzan S, Paroush J (1985) Collective decision making: an economic outlook, Cambridge University Press, London
Paroush J, Karotkin D (1989) Robustness of optimal majority rules over teams with changing size. Soc Choice Welf 6:127–139
Paroush J (1997) Order relations among efficient decision rules. Theory Decis 43:209–218
Shapley L, Grofman B (1984) Optimizing group judgment accuracy in the presence of interdependencies. Public Choice 43:329–343
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karotkin, D., Paroush, J. Robustness of optimal decision rules where one of the team members is exceptionally qualified. Soc Choice Welfare 26, 131–141 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-005-0053-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-005-0053-3