Management of uncertainty in the attachment problem in natural language processing

1. Altmann, G. and Steedman, M., “Interaction with context during human sentence processing,” Cognition 30 pp. 191–238 (1988).

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. Bhatnagar, R.K. and Kanal, L.N., “Handling Uncertain Information: A Review of Numeric and Non-numeric Methods,” pp. 3–26 in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, ed. L.N. Kanal, J.F. Lemmer, North-Holland (1986).

   Google Scholar 

3. Chamiak, E., “Six topics in Search of a Parser,” pp. 1079–1087 in Proc.7th IJCAI, Vancouver (1981).

   Google Scholar 

4. Connine, C., Ferreira, F., Jones, C., Clifton, C., and Frazier, L., “Verb frame preferences: Descriptive norms,” Journal of psycholinguistic research 13(4) pp. 407–428 (1975).

   Google Scholar 

5. Crain, S. and Steedman, M., “On Not Being Led Up The Garden Path: The Use of Context by the Psychological Parser,” in Syntactic Theory and How People Parse Sentences, ed. D.R. Dowty, L.J. Karttunen, A.M. Zwicky, Cambridge Univ. Press (1984).

   Google Scholar 

6. DiEugenio, B. and Lesmo, L., “Representation and interpretation of determiners in natural language,” pp. 648–654 in Proc. IJCAI 87, Milano (1987).

   Google Scholar 

7. Dubois, D. and Prade, H., Fuzzy sets and systems: theory and applications, Academic Press (1980).

   Google Scholar 

8. Fillmore, C., “The case for case,” in Universals in linguistic theory, ed. Bach and Harms, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1968).

   Google Scholar 

9. Ford, M., Bresnan, J.V., and Kaplan, R.M., “A competence based theory of syntactic closure,” in The mental representation of grammatical relations, ed. Bresnan, MIT Press (1982).

   Google Scholar 

10. Frazier, L. and Fodor, J.D., “The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model,” Cognition 6 (4), pp. 291–235 (December 1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hirst, G., Semantic interpretation and the resolution of ambiguity, Cambridge University Press (1987).

    Google Scholar 

12. Lesmo, L., Berti, M., and Terenziani, P., “A Network Formalism for Representing Natural Language Quantifiers,” pp. 473–478 in Proc. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence 88, Munich (1988).

    Google Scholar 

13. Lesmo, L., Saitta, L., and Torasso, P., “Evidence Combination in Expert Systems,” Man-Machine Studies 22 pp. 307–326 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

14. Lesmo, L. and Torasso, P., “Analysis of Conjunctions in a Rule Based Parser,” pp. 180–187 in Proc. 23rd Annual Meeting of Association Computational Linguistics, (1985).

    Google Scholar 

15. Lesmo, L. and Torasso, P., “A Flexible Natural Language Parser based on a two-level Representation of Syntax,” pp. 114–121 in Proc. 1st Conf. ACL Europe, Pisa (1983).

    Google Scholar 

16. Lesmo, L. and Torasso, P., “Weighted Interaction of Syntax and Semantics in Natural Language Analysis,” pp. 772–778 in Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conf. on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles (1985).

    Google Scholar 

17. Marcus, M., A Theory of Syntactic Recognition for Natural Language, MIT Press (1980).

    Google Scholar 

18. Sagalowicz, D., “Mechanical Intelligence: Research and Applications,” Tech. Report, SRI Int., Menlo Park (1980).

    Google Scholar 

19. Schank, R., Conceptual information processing, North Holland, Amsterdam (1975).

    Google Scholar 

20. Terenziani, P., “A Rule Based Approach to the Semantic Interpretation of Natural Language,” to appear in Computers and Artificial Intelligence, (1991).

    Google Scholar 

21. Tyler, L.K. and Marslen-Wilson, W.D., “Speech Comprehension Process,” pp. 169–184 in Perspectives on mental representation: Experimental and Theoretical studies of cognitive processes, ed. Mehler, Walker, Garret,Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1982).

    Google Scholar 

22. Wilks, Y.A., Huang, X., and Fass, D., “Syntax, preference and right attachment,” pp. 779–784 in Proc.9th IJCAI, Los Angeles (1985).

    Google Scholar 

23. Wilks, Y.A., “A preferential Pattern-Seeking Semantics for Natural Language Inference,” Artificial Intelligence 6 pp. 53–74 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Winograd, T., Language as a Cognitive Process — Syntax —, Addison-Wesley (1983).

    Google Scholar 

25. Winograd, T., Understanding Natural Language, Academic Press, New York (1972).

    Google Scholar 

26. Woods, W.A., Kaplan, R.M., and Nash-Webber, B.L., “The Lunar Sciences Natural Language Information System: Final Report,” Tech. Report 2378, BBN Inc., Cambridge (1972).

    Google Scholar 

27. Woods, W.A., “Semantics for a question answering system,” Outstanding dissertations in Computer Sciences, (1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references