Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education

• Allen K.L., Galvis, D.L., & Katz R.V. (2004)Evaluation of CDs and chewing gum in teaching dental anatomy. Paper presented at the International Association for Dental Research 82nd General Session and Exhibition. Retrieved June 17, 2004, from http://iadr.confex.com/iadr/2004Hawaii/techprogram/abstract_40091.htm

• Bannan-Ritland, B. (2003). The role of design in research: The integrative learning design framework.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 21–24.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Boyer, E.L. (1990).Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

  Google Scholar 

• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A., & Cocking, R. (Eds.). (2000).How people learn: Mind, brain, experience and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Carroll, J.B. (1973). Basic and applied research in education: Definitions, distinctions, and implications. In H. S. Broudy, R. H. Ennis, & L. I. Krimerman (Eds.),Philosophy of educational research (pp. 108–121). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Casti, J.L. (1989).Paradigms lost: Images of man in the mirror of science. New York: William Morrow.

  Google Scholar 

• Clark, R. E. (Ed.). (2001).Learning from media: Arguments, analysis, and evidence. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

  Google Scholar 

• Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schäuble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 9–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990a). Anchored instruction and its relationship to situated cognition.Educational Researcher, 19(6), 2–10.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1990b). Technology and the design of generative learning environments.Educational Technology, 31(5), 34–40.

  Google Scholar 

• Corey, S. (1953).Action research to improve school practice. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.

  Google Scholar 

• Creswell, J.W. (2003).Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Cronbach, L.J. (1975). Beyond the two disciplines of scientific psychology.American Psychologist, 30, 116–126.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cuban, L. (2001).Oversold and underused: Computers in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Desforges, C. (2001, August).Familiar challenges and new approaches: Necessary advances in theory and methods in research on teaching and learning. The Desmond Nuttall/Carfax Memorial Lecture, British Educational Research Association (BERA) Annual Conference, Cardiff. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.tlrp.org/ acadpub/Desforges2000a.pdf

• Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Dewey, J. (1938).Experience and education. New York: Simon and Schuster.

  Google Scholar 

• Dillon, A., & Gabbard, R. (1998). Hypermedia as an educational technology: A review of the quantitative research literature on learning comprehension, control and style.Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 322–349.

  Google Scholar 

• Exploratorium. (1998).A description of inquiry. Retrieved August 19, 2004, from http://www.exploratorium.edu/IFI/about/inquiry.html

• Fabos, B., & Young, M.D. (1999). Telecommunications in the classroom: Rhetoric versus reality.Review of Educational Research, 69(3), 217–259.

  Google Scholar 

• Farley, F.H. (1982). The future of educational research.Educational Researcher, 11(8), 11–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Feuer, M. J., Towne, L., & Shavelson, R.J. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research.Educational Researcher, 31(8), 4–14.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gorard, S., Roberts, K., & Taylor, C. (2004). What kind of creature is a design experiment?British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 577–590.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Herrington, J., Reeves, T.C., Oliver, R., & Woo, Y. (2004). Designing authentic activities in web-based courses.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–29.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kelly, A.E. (2003). Research as design.Educational Researcher, 32(1), 3–4.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lagemann, E.C. (2000).An elusive science: The troubling history of educational research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Maxwell, J. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education.Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• McGrath, B. (2004, February 9). Chew on.New Yorker [Electronic version. Retrieved March 15, 2004, from http://www.newyorker.com/talk/content/ ?040209ta_talk_mcgrath

• Moxley, J.M. (1992).Publish, don’t perish: The scholar’s guide to academic writing and publishing. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

  Google Scholar 

• National Research Council. (1999).Transforming undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Newman, D. (1990). Opportunities for research on the organizational impact of school computers.Educational Researcher, 19(3), 8–13.

  Google Scholar 

• Noble, D.F. (2001).Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. New York: Monthly Review Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Olson, D.R. (2004). The triumph of home over experience in the search for “what works”: A response to Slavin.Educational Researcher, 33(1), 24–26.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reason P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.). (2001).Handbook of action research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Reeves, T.C. (2003). Storm clouds on the digital education horizon.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 15(1), 3–26.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reeves, T.C. (1993). Pseudoscience in computer-based instruction: The case of learner control research.Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(2), 39–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Richey, R.C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice.Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ross, S. M., Morrison, G.R., & Lowther, D.L. (2005). Using experimental methods in higher education research,Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 39–64.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Russell, T.L. (1999).The no significant difference phenomenon. Montgomery, AL: International Distance Education Certification Center.

  Google Scholar 

• Saettler, P. (1990).The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.

  Google Scholar 

• Shulman, L. (2001). Inventing the future. In P. Hutchings (Ed).Opening lines: Approaches to the scholarship of teaching and learning. Menlo Park, CA: Carnegie Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• Silverman, F. (1999).Publishing for tenure and beyond. Westport, CT: Praeger.

  Google Scholar 

• Slavin, R. E. (2002) Evidence-based educational policies: Transforming educational practice and research.Educational Researcher, 31(7), 15–21.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Thyer, B. (1994).Successful publishing in scholarly journals — Survival skills for scholars. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

  Google Scholar 

• van den Akker, J. (1999). Principles and methods of development research. In J. van den Akker, N. Nieveen, R. M. Branch, K. L. Gustafson, & T. Plomp, (Eds.),Design methodology and developmental research in education and training (pp. 1–14). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

  Google Scholar 

• Zemsky, R., & Massy, W.F. (2004).Thwarted innovation: What happened to eleaming and why. Final Report for The Weatherstation Project of The Learning Alliance at the University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved July 17, 2004, from http:// www.irhe.upenn.edu/Docs/Jun2004/ThwartedInnovation.pdf

Download references