Abstract
The present article is an attempt to give—in the frame of the theory of the organism-environment system (jarvilehto, 1998a)—a new interpretation to the role of efferent influences on receptor activity and to the functions of senses in the formation of knowledge. It is argued, on the basis of experimental evidence and theoretical considerations, that the senses are not transmitters of environmental information, but create a direct connection between the organism and the environment, which makes the development of a dynamic living system, the organism-environment system, possible. In this connection process, the efferent influences on receptor activity are of particular significance because, with their help, the receptors may be adjusted in relation to the parts of the environment that are most important in achieving behavioral results. Perception is the process of joining of new parts of the environment to the organism-environment system; thus, the formation of knowledge by perception is based on reorganization (widening and differentiation) of the organism-environment system, and not on transmission of information from the environment. With the help of the efferent influences of receptors, each organism creates its own peculiar world that is simultaneously subjective and objective. The present considerations have far-reaching influences as well on experimental work in neurophysiology and psychology of perception as on philosophical consideration of knowledge formation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexandrov, Yu.I., Grinchenko, Yu.V., Shvyrkov, B., Jarvilehto, T., and Soininen, K. (1986). “System-specific activity of optic tract fibers in open and closed eye behavior.”The Soviet Journal of Psychology 7: 299–308.
Alexandrov, Yu.I., and Jarvilehto, T. (1993). “Activity versus reactivity in psychology and neuropsychology.”Ecological Psychology 5: 85–103.
Astrand, K., Hamalainen, H., Alexandrov, Yu.I., and Jarvilehto, T. (1986). “Response characteristics of peripheral mechanoreceptive units in man: relation to the sensation magnitude and to the subjet’s taks.Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 64: 438–446.
Bain, A. (1855).The Senses and The Intellect. London: Longmans, Green.
Biondi, E., and Grandori, F. (1976). “Do efferent fibers to hair cells intervene in acoustic stimulus peripheral coding?”.International Journal of Bio-Medical Computing 7: 205–211.
Coren, S. (1986). “An efferent component in the visual perception of direction and extent.”Psychological Review 93: 391–410.
Freeman, W.J. (1995).Societies of Brains. A Study in the Neuroscience of Love and Hate, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Freeman, W.J. (1997). A neurobiological interpretation of semiotics: meaning, representation, and causality.Proceedings: Conference on Semiotics and Machine Intelligence, National Institute of Standards & Technology Gaithersburg, MD.
Gibson, J.J. (1979).The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Highstein, S.M. (1991). “The central nervous system efferent control of the organs of balance and equilibrium.”Neuroscience Research 12: 13–30.
Jarvilehto, T. (1977). “Neural basis of cutaneous sensations analysed by microelectrode recordings from human peripheral nerves—a review.”Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 18: 348–359.
Jarvilehto, T. (1994).Man and His Environment. Essentials of Systemic Psychology. Oulu: Pohjoinen, 224 p. (In Finnish).
Jarvilehto, T. (1994) Learning as formation of man-environment system. In:Proceedings of the International Workshop on CLCE, ed. by Levonen J.J. and Tukiainen, M.T., p. 7–8. Joensuu: Joensuu University Press.
Jarvilehto, T. (1998a). “The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Description of the theory.”Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Sicence 33: 4.
Jarvilehto, T. (1998b). “The theory of the organism-environment system: I. Significance of nervous activity in the organism-environment system.”Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 33: 4.
Koffka, K. (1935).Principles of Gestalt Psychology. London: Bradford.
Liberman, M.C., Dodds, L.W., and Pierce, S. (1990). “Afferent and efferent innervation of the cat cochlea: quantitative analysis with light and electron microscopy.Journal of Comparative Neurology 301: 443–460.
Maturana, H.R., and Varela, F.J. (1987).The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological roots of Humans Understanding. Boston: Shambhala.
Mead, G.H. (1934).Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago: Chicago Univ. Press.
Kikkelsen, J.D. (1992). “Visualization of efferent retinal projections by immunohistochemical identification of cholera toxin subunit B.”Brain Research Bulletin 28: 619–623.
Popper, K.R. (1962)Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.
Shannon, C.E. (1948). “A mathematical theory of communication.”Bell System Technical Journal 27: 379–423, 623–656.
Spinoza, B. (1677/1985). “Ethics.” In:The Collected Works of Spinoza (Ed. E. Curley, pp. 408–617. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
Somjen, G. (1972).Sensory Coding in the Mammalian Nervous System. New York: Meredith.
Tani, J. and Nolfi, S. (1997). “Self-organization of modules and their hierarchy in robot learning problems: A dynamical systems appraoch.”Sony Computer Science Laboratory Inc., Technical Report: SCSL-TR-97-008.
Thelen, E., and Smith, L.B. (1994).Streifizuge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer. Reprinted in J. Schiller (Ed) Instinctive Behavior. New York: International Univ. Press, 1957.
Wundt, W. (1897).Outlines of Psychology. Leipzig: Engelmann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jarvilehto, T. The theory of the organism-environment system: III. Role of efferent influences on receptors in the formation of knowledge. Integrative Physiological and Behavioral Science 34, 90–100 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688715
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02688715