[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

LetR be any correlation matrix of ordern, with unity as each main diagonal element. Common-factor analysis, in the Spearman-Thurstone sense, seeks a diagonal matrixU 2 such thatG = R − U 2 is Gramian and of minimum rankr. Lets 1 be the number of latent roots ofR which are greater than or equal to unity. Then it is proved here thatrs 1. Two further lower bounds tor are also established that are better thans 1. Simple computing procedures are shown for all three lower bounds that avoid any calculations of latent roots. It is proved further that there are many cases where the rank of all diagonal-free submatrices inR is small, but the minimum rankr for a GramianG is nevertheless very large compared withn. Heuristic criteria are given for testing the hypothesis that a finiter exists for the infinite universe of content from which the sample ofn observed variables is selected; in many cases, the Spearman-Thurstone type of multiple common-factor structure cannot hold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albert, A. A. The matrices of factor analysis.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1944,30, 90–95.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Albert, A. A. The minimum rank of a correlation matrix.Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci.,30, 144–148.

  3. Bôcher, Maxime. Introduction to Higher Algebra. New York: Macmillan, 1907. (Sixteenth printing, 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Guttman, Louis. Multiple rectilinear prediction and the resolution into components.Psychometrika, 1940,5, 75–99.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guttman, Louis, General theory and methods for matric factoring.Psychometrika, 1944,9, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Guttman, Louis. A new approach to factor analysis: the radex. In Paul F. Lazarsfeld (ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences. The Free Press, 1954.

  7. Guttman, Louis. Two new approaches to factor analysis. Office of Naval Research, Annual technical report on project Nonr-731(00), 1953.

  8. Guttman, Louis. Image theory for the structure of quantitative variates.Psychometrika, 1953,19, 277–296.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lazarsfeld, Paul F. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. In S. A. Stouffer, et al., Measurement and prediction, Princeton Univ. Press, 1950.

  10. Rosner, Burt. An algebraic solution for the communalities.Psychometrika, 1948, 13, 181–184.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Thomson, Godfrey. The factorial analysis of human ability. Univ. London Press, 1950.

  12. Thurstone, L. L. Multiple-factor analysis. Univ. Chicago Press, 1947.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was made possible in part by an uncommitted grant-in-aid from the Behavioral Sciences Division of the Ford Foundation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guttman, L. Some necessary conditions for common-factor analysis. Psychometrika 19, 149–161 (1954). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289162

Keywords

Navigation