An evaluation of theories of information with regard to the semantic and pragmatic aspects of information systems

• Anderton, R. (1987). Information, systems and the construction of meaning.Int. J. Inform. Manage. 7, 181–185.

  Google Scholar 

• Artandi, S. (1973). Information concepts and their utility.J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 24, 242–245.

  Google Scholar 

• Bar-Hillel, Y. (1952). Semantic information and its measures. InTransactions of the Tenth Conference on Cybernetics, J. Macy Foundation, New York, pp. 33–48. [Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), 298–312.]

  Google Scholar 

• Bar-Hillel, Y. (1955). An examination of information theory.Philos. Sci. 22, 86–105. [Reprinted in Bar-Hillel (1964), 275–297.]

  Google Scholar 

• Bar-Hillel, Y. (1964).Language and Information: Selected Essays on Their Theory and Application, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Bar-Hillel, Y., and Carnap, R. (1952). An outline of a theory of semantic information.Technical Report 247, Research Laboratory of Electronics, MIT, Cambridge, MA [Reprinted inBarHillel (1964), 221–274.]

  Google Scholar 

• Bednarz, J. (1988). Information and meaning: Philosophical remarks on some cybernetic concepts.Grundlagenstud. Kybernetik- Geistenwissenschaft 29(1), 17–25.

  Google Scholar 

• Belkin, N. (1978). Information concepts for information science.J. Document. 34(1), 55–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Belkin, N., and Robertson, S. (1976). Information science and the phenomenon of information.J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. 27, 197–204.

  Google Scholar 

• Boland, R. (1987). The in-formation of information systems. In Boland, R., and Hirscheim, R. (eds.),Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Boulding, K. (1956).The Image, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

  Google Scholar 

• Brillouin, L. (1962).Science and Information Theory, Academic Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Checkland, P., and Scholes, J. (1990).Soft Systems Methodology in Action, Wiley, Chichester.

  Google Scholar 

• Derr, R. (1985). The concept of information in ordinary discourse.Inform. Process. Manage. 21(6), 489–499.

  Google Scholar 

• Devlin, K. (1991).Logic and Information, Cambridge U.P., Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Dretske, F. (1981).Knowledge and the Flow of Information, Blackwell, Oxford.

  Google Scholar 

• Dretske, F. (1983). Precis of ‘Knowledge and the Flow of Information.’Behav. Brain Sci. 6, 55–90.

  Google Scholar 

• Farradane, J. (1976). Towards a true information science.Inform. Sci. 10(3), 91–101.

  Google Scholar 

• Fox, C. (1983).Information and Misinformation, Greenwood Press, CT.

  Google Scholar 

• Gilligan, J. (1994). Patterns on glass: The language games of information.Symposium on the Philosophical and Logical Aspects of Information Systems, University of the West of England, Bristol, 20–22, Apr.

  Google Scholar 

• Goffman, W. (1970). Information science: discipline or disappearance?Aslib Proc. 22, 589–595.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldkuhl, G., and Lyytinen, K. (1982). A language action view of information systems. In Ginzberg, M., and Ross, M. (eds.),Proceedings, 3rd International Conference on Information Systems, Ann Arbor, MI.

• Goldkuhl, G., and Lyytinen, K. (1984). Information: Systems specification as rule reconstruction. In Bemelmans, T. (ed.),Beyond Productivity: Information Systems for Organizational Effectiveness, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 79–94.

  Google Scholar 

• Habermas, J. (1979).Communication and the Evolution of Society, Heinemann, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Habermas, J. (1984).The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Heinemann, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Habermas, J. (1989).The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Polity Press, Cambridge.

  Google Scholar 

• Harnden, R., and Mullery, G. (1991). Enabling network systems (ENS).Syst. Pract. 4, 579–598.

  Google Scholar 

• Hartley, R. (1928). Transmission of information.Bell Syst. Tech. J. 7, 535–563.

  Google Scholar 

• Hintikka, J. (1968). The varieties of information and scientific explanation. In van Rootselar, B., and Staal, J. (eds.),Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science III, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 311–331.

  Google Scholar 

• Jumarie, G. (1990).Relative Information: Theories and Applications, Springer Verlag, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Kary, M. (1990). Information theory and theTreatise: Towards a new understanding. In Weingartner, P., and Dorn, G. (eds.),Studies on Mario Bunge's Treatise, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 263–280.

  Google Scholar 

• Kensing, F., and Winograd, T. (1991). The language/action approach to design of computer-support for cooperative work: A preliminary study in work mapping. In Stamper, R., Kerola, P., Lee, R., and Lyytinen, K. (eds.),Collaborative Work, Social Communications and Information Systems, Elsevier North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 311–332.

  Google Scholar 

• Lehtinen, E., and Lyytinen, K. (1986). Action based model of information systems.Inform. Syst. 11, 299–317.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewis, P. (1991). The decision making basis for information systems: The contribution of Vickers' concept of appreciation to a soft systems perspective.J. Inform. Syst. 1(1), 33–43.

  Google Scholar 

• Lewis, P. (1993). Linking soft systems methodology with data-focussed information systems developments.J. Inform. Syst. 3(3), 169–186.

  Google Scholar 

• Liebenau, J., and Backhouse, J. (1990).Understanding Information: An Introduction, Macmillan, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Luhmann, N. (1971). Sinn als Grundbegriff der Sociologie. In Habermas, J., and Luhmann, N. (eds.),Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie? [Translated and reprinted as Luhmann (1990).]

• Luhmann, N. (1990). Meaning as sociology's basic concept. In Luhmann, N. (ed.),Essays in Self-Reference, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 21–85.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., and Klein, H. (1985). The critical theory of Jurgen Habermas as a basis for a theory of information systems. In Mumford, E., Hirschheim, R., Fitzgerald, G., and Wood-Harper, A. (eds.),Research Methods in Information Systems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 219–236.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., Klein, H., and Hirschheim (1991). The effectiveness of office information systems: A social action perspective.J. Inform. Syst. 1, 41–60.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1956). The place of ‘meaning’ in the theory of information. In Cherry, C. (ed.),Information Theory: Third London Symposium, Butterworths, London, pp. 215–225.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1961). The informational analysis of questions and commands. In Cherry, C. (ed.),Information Theory: Fourth London Symposium, Butterworths, London, pp. 469–476.

  Google Scholar 

• MacKay, D. (1969).Information, Mechanism and Meaning, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  Google Scholar 

• Maturana, H. (1975). Representation and Communication Functions, BCL 57/5, Biological Computer Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana, pp. 1–29.

  Google Scholar 

• Maturana, H. (1978). Biology of language: The epistemology of reality. In Millar, G., and Lennenberg, E. (eds.),Psychology and Biology of Language and Thought: Essays in Honour of Eric Lennenberg, Academic Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Maturana, H. (1988). Reality: The search for objectivity or the quest for a compelling argument.Irish J. Psychol. 9(1), 25–82.

  Google Scholar 

• Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1980).Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

  Google Scholar 

• Maturana, H., and Varela, F. (1987).The Tree of Knowledge, Shambhala, Boston.

  Google Scholar 

• Mingers, J. (1995a).Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis, Plenum Press, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Mingers, J. (1995b). Information and meaning: Foundations for an intersubjective account.J. Inform. Syst. 5(4), 285–306.

  Google Scholar 

• Mingers, J. (1996). Embodying information systems. In Jones, M., Orlikowski, W., Walsham, G., and DeGross, J. (eds.),Information Technology and Changes in Organizational Work, Chapman and Hall, London 272–292.

  Google Scholar 

• Morris, C. (1938). Foundations of the Theory of Signs.International Encyclopedia of Unified Science, Vol. 1, No. 2, University of Chicago Press, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Nauta, D. (1972).The Meaning of Information, Mouton, The Hague.

  Google Scholar 

• Ngwenyama, O. (1991). The critical social theory approach to information systems: Problems and challenges. In Nissen, H., Klein, H., and Hirschheim, R. (eds.),Information Systems Research: Contemporary Approaches and Emergent Traditions, North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 267–280.

  Google Scholar 

• Otten, K. (1975). Information and communication: A conceptual model as framework for development of theories of information. In Debbons, A., and Cameron, W. (eds.),Perspectives in Information Science, Noordhof, Leyden, pp. 127–148.

  Google Scholar 

• Pratt, A. (1977). The information of the image: A model of the communication process.Libri 27(3), 204–220.

  Google Scholar 

• Shannon, C., and Weaver, W. (1949).The Mathematical Theory of Communication, University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

  Google Scholar 

• Stamper, R. (1973).Information in Business and Administrative Systems, Wiley, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Stamper, R. (1985). Towards a theory of information: Mystical fluid or subject for scientific enquiry?Computer J. 28(3), 195–199.

  Google Scholar 

• Stamper, R. (1987). Semantics. In Boland, R., and Hirscheim, R. (eds.),Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, Wiley, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Stephens, R., and Wood, J. (1991). Information systems as linguistic systems: A constructivist perspective. In Jackson, M., Mansell, G., Flood, R., Blackham, R., and Probert, S. (eds.),Systems Thinking in Europe, Plenum, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Stonier, T. (1990).Information and the Internal Structure of the Universe, Springer-Verlag, New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Thompson, F. (1968). The organization is the information.Am. Document. 19(July), 305–308.

  Google Scholar 

• Winograd, T. (1987). A language/action perspective on the design of cooperative work.Hum.-Comput. Interact. 3, 3–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1986).Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Ablex, Norwood, New Jersey.

  Google Scholar 

Download references