[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Finite termination of the proximal point algorithm

  • Published:
Mathematical Programming Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper concerns the notion of a sharp minimum on a set and its relationship to the proximal point algorithm. We give several equivalent definitions of the property and use the notion to prove finite termination of the proximal point algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • D.P. Bertsekas and J.N. Tsitsiklis,Parallel and Distributed Computation (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Brézis,Opérateurs Maximaux Monotones (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • J.V. Burke and M.C. Ferris, “The sharpness of functions on sets,” in preparation (1991).

  • R. De Leone and O.L. Mangasarian, “Serial and parallel solution of large scale linear programs by augmented Lagrangian successive overrelaxation,” in: A. Kurzhanski, K. Neumann and D. Pallaschke, eds.,Optimization, Parallel Processing and Applications. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems No. 304 (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988) pp. 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Ekeland, “On the variational principle,”Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 47 (1974) 324–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.C. Ferris, “Weak sharp minima and penalty functions in mathematical programming,” Technical Report 779, Computer Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin (Madison, WI, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • O.L. Mangasarian, “Normal solutions of linear programs,”Mathematical Programming Study 22 (1984) 206–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • O.L. Mangasarian, “Error bounds for nondegenerate monotone linear complementarity problems,”Mathematical Programming (Series B) 48 (1990) 437–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.-J. Moreau, “Proximité et dualité dans un espace Hilbertien,”Bulletin de la Société Mathématique de France 93 (1965) 273–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • B.T. Polyak,Introduction to Optimization (Optimization Software, Publications Division, New York, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • B.T. Polyak and N.V. Tretiyakov, “Concerning an iterative method for linear programming and its economic interpretation,”Economics and Mathematical Methods 8 (1972) 740–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • R.T. Rockafellar, “Monotone operators and the proximal point algorithm,”SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization 14 (1976) 877–898.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This material is based on research supported by National Science Foundation Grants DCR-8521228 and CCR-8723091, and Air Force Office of Scientific Research Grant AFOSR-86-0172.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferris, M.C. Finite termination of the proximal point algorithm. Mathematical Programming 50, 359–366 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01594944

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01594944

Key words

Navigation