[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Spin: A 3D interface for cooperative work

  • Published:
Virtual Reality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a three-dimensional user interface for synchronous co-operative work, Spin, which has been designed for multi-user synchronous real-time applications to be used in, for example, meetings and learning situations. Spin is based on a new metaphor of virtual workspace. We have designed an interface, for an office environment, which recreates the three-dimensional elements needed during a meeting and increases the user's scope of interaction. In order to accomplish these objectives, animation and three-dimensional interaction in real time are used to enhance the feeling of collaboration within the three-dimensional workspace. Spin is designed to maintain a maximum amount of information visible. The workspace is created using artificial geometry — as opposed to true three-dimensional geometry — and spatial distortion, a technique that allows all documents and information to be displayed simultaneously while centring the user's focus of attention. Users interact with each other via their respective clones, which are three-dimensional representations displayed in each user's interface, and are animated with user action on shared documents. An appropriate object manipulation system (direct manipulation, 3D devices and specific interaction metaphors) is used to point out and manipulate 3D documents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Schneiderman B. Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction, third edition. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1997

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bly S, Rosenberg J. A comparison of tiled and overlapping windows. In: CHI'86 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1986; 101–106

  3. Kahn MJ, Charnock E. How to prevent ‘windowitis’ in your graphical user interface. In: Proceedings of the Silicon Valley Ergonomics Conference and Exposition ErgoCon '95, pp 18–25

  4. Tanaka S, Okada K, Kurihara S, Matsushita Y. Desktop conferencing system using multiple still-pictures: Desktop-MAJIC. In: CSCW'96 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1996

  5. Roberts D. RealPlaces, 3D interface for office applications. In: IEE colloquium on the 3D Interface for the information Worker '98(437), 1998

  6. Bastien C, Scapin DL. Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1995; 7:105–121

    Google Scholar 

  7. Carr K, England R. Simulated and virtual realities: elements of perception. Taylor and Francis, London, 1995

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nardi BA, Context and consciousness. Activity theory and human-computer interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1996

    Google Scholar 

  9. Buxton WAS. Telepresence: integrating shared task and person spaces. In: Graphics Interface '92 Conference Proceedings, 1992; 123–129

  10. Okada K, Maeda F, Ichikawa Y, Matsushita Y. Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on CSCW'94, ACM Press. 1994; 385–393

  11. Cassel J, Pelachaud C, Badler N, Steedman M, Achorn B, Becket T, Douville B, Prevost S, Stone M. Animated conversation: rule-based generation of facial expression, gesture and spoken intonation, for multiple conversational agents. In: Siggraph'94 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1994; 413–420.

  12. Shu L, Flowers W. Teledesign: groupware user experiments in three-dimensional computer-aided-design. Collaborative Computing 1994; 1(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kuzuoka H, Kosuge T, Tanaka M. GestureCam, a video communication system for sympathetic remote collaboration. In: Proceedings of ACM Conference on CSCW'94, ACM Press. 1994: 35–43

  14. Benford S, Greenhalgh C, Bowers J, Snowdon D, Fahlén LE. User embodiment in collaborative virtual environments. In: CHI'95 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1995; 242–248

  15. Benford S, Fahlén L. A spatial model of interaction in large virtual environments. In: ECSCW'93 Conference Proceedings, Kluwer Academic. 1993

  16. Henderson DA, Card Jr, Card SK. Rooms: the use of multiple virtual workspaces to reduce space contention in a window-based graphical user interface. ACM Transactions on Graphics 1986; 5(3):211–243

    Google Scholar 

  17. Harrison BL, Ishii H, Vicente KJ, Buxton WAS. Transparent Layered User Interfaces: an evaluation of a display design to enhance focused and divided attention. In: CHI'95 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1995; 317–324

  18. Mackinlay JD, Robertson GG, Card SK. The perspective wall: detail and context smoothly integrated. In: Proceedings of CHI'91, ACM Press. 1991;173–180

  19. Robertson GG, Card SK, Mackinlay JD. Cone Trees: animated 3D visualisations of hierarchical information. In: CHI'91 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1991

  20. Gomez JE, Venolia D, van Dam A, Fields T, Carey R. Why is 3D interaction so hard and what can we really do about it? In: Siggraph'94 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1994; 492–493

  21. Kabbash P, Buxton W, Sellen A. Two-handed input in a compound task. In: CHI'94 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1994

  22. Venolia D. Facile 3D direct manipulation. In: InterCHI'93 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1993

  23. Fuchs P. Les Interfaces de la Réalité Virtuelle. Association des Journées Internationales de l'Informatique de Montpellier-District, Montpellier, France, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dix JA, Finlay JE, Abowd GD, Beale R. Human-computer interaction. second edition. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1998

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zhai S, Buxton W, Milgram P. The ‘Silk Cursor’, investigating transparency for 3D acquisition. In: CHI'94 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1994

  26. Cadoz C. Le geste canal de communication homme/machine — la communication instrumentale. Technique et Science Informatiques 1994; 13(1):31–61

    Google Scholar 

  27. Saugis G, Dumas C, Chaillou C. A new model of interface for synchronous CSCW. In: XIV Imeko World Congress, ISMCR 97 Topical Workshop on Virtual Reality and Advanced Man — Machine Interface, Tampere, Finland, Finnish Society of Automation. 1997

    Google Scholar 

  28. Furnas GW. Generalized fisheye views, human factors in computing systems. In: CHI'86 Conference Proceedings, ACM Press. 1986: 16–23

  29. Kersten D, Mamassian P, Knill DC. Moving cast shadows induce apparent motion in depth. Perception 1997; 26:171–192

    Google Scholar 

  30. Plénacoste P, Demarey C, Dumas C. The role of static and dynamic shadows in a three-dimensional computer environment. In: Conference of AACE-Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education in cooperation with WWW/Internet Businesses and Industry, WebNet 98, Orlando, Fl., 1998

  31. Televirtuality. Televirtuality Project: http://www.ina.fr/Recherche/TV/TV.en.html

  32. Viaud ML, Saulnier A. Real time analysis and synthesis chain. In: Proceedings of the 1995 International Workshop on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, IEEE 1995

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Dumas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dumas, C., Saugis, G., Degrande, S. et al. Spin: A 3D interface for cooperative work. Virtual Reality 4, 15–25 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434991

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01434991

Keywords

Navigation