Structural reconfiguration and informal coordination in administrative organizations

• Allison, G. (1971),Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.

  Google Scholar 

• Batchelder, W.H. and A.K. Romney (1986), “The Statistical Analysis of a General Condorcet Model for Dichotomous Choice Situations,”Information Pooling and Group Decision Making: Proceedings of the Second University of California, Irvine, Conference on Political Economy. B. Grofman and G. Owen, Eds., Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Bendor, J.B. (1985)Parallel Systems: Redundancy in Government. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Carley, K.M. (1991), “Designing Organizational Structures to Cope with Communication Breakdowns: A Simulation Model”,Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 5, 19–57.

  Google Scholar 

• Carley, K.M. (1992), “Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover,”Organization Science, 3(1), 20–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Cyert, R. and J. March (1963),A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Engelwood Cliffs, NY: Prentice-Hall.

  Google Scholar 

• Condorcet, N.C. (1785),Essai sur l'Application de l'Analyse de Probabilite des Decisions Rendues a Pluralite des Voix. Paris.

• Healy, A.F. and M. Kubovy (1981), “Probability Matching and the Formation of Conservative Decision Rules in a Numerical Analog of Signal Detection,”Journal of Experimental Psychology, Human Learning and Memory, 7 (September), 344–354.

  Google Scholar 

• Heimann, C.L. (1993), “Understanding the Challenger Disaster: Organizational Structure and the Design of Reliable Systems,”American Political Science Review, 87(2), 421–435.

  Google Scholar 

• Kalisetty, S.P., D.L. Kleinman, D. Serfaty, and E.E. Entin (1993), “Coordination in Hierarchical Information Processing Structures (CHIPS): Experiment and Modeling Framework,”Proceedings of the 1993 Symposium on Command and Control Research, National Defense University, Fort McNair, Washington, DC.

• Landau, M. (1969), “Redundancy, Rationality and the Problem of Duplication and Overlap,”Public Administration Review, 29(4), 346–358.

  Google Scholar 

• LaPorte, T.R. and P.M. Consolini (1991), “Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of High-Reliability Organizations,”Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1(1), 19–47

  Google Scholar 

• Luce, R.D. (1963),Handbook of Mathematical Psychology. R.D. Luce, R.R. Bush, E. Galanter (Eds.), New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Macmillan, N.A. and H.L. Kaplan (1985), “Detection Theory Analysis of Group Data: Estimating Sensitivity From Average Hit and False-Alarm Rates,”Psychological Bulletin, 98(1), 185–199.

  Google Scholar 

• Nitzan, S. and J. Paroush (1982), “Optimal Decision Rules in Uncertain Dichotomous Choice Situations,”International Economic Review, 23(2), 289–297.

  Google Scholar 

• Nitzan, S. and U. Procaccia (1986), “Optimal Voting Procedures for Profit Maximizing Firms,”Public Choice, 51(2), 191–208.

  Google Scholar 

• Papastavrou, J.D. (1990),Decentralized Decision Making in a Hypothesis Testing Environment. Technical Report: LIDS-TH-1974, Cambridge, MA: Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems, MIT.

  Google Scholar 

• Papastavrou, J.D. and M. Athans (1992), “On Optimal Distributed Detection Architectures in a Hypothesis Testing Environment,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-37(8), 1154–1169.

  Google Scholar 

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1993a), “Optimal Team and Individual Decision Rules in Uncertain Dichotomous Situations,”Public Choice, 75, 205–230.

  Google Scholar 

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1993b), “Distributed Detection in Teams with Partial Information: A Normative-Descriptive Model,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-23(6), 1626–1648.

  Google Scholar 

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1993c), “Tasks and Organizations: A Signal Detection Model of Organizational Decisionmaking,”International Journal of Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance and Management, 2, 289–303.

  Google Scholar 

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1994), “Optimization of Detection Networks with Multiple Event Structures,”IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-39, 1702–1707.

  Google Scholar 

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1995a), “Optimization of Decision Networks in Structured Task Environments,” submitted for publication toIEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 1995.

• Pete, A., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1995b), “Designing Organizations with Congruent Structures,”Proceedings of the 1995 First International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, SAIC, McLean, VA.

• Pete, A., D.L. Kleinman, and P.W. Young (1995), “Organizational Performance of Human Teams in a Structured Task Environment,”Proceedings of the 1995 First International Symposium on Command and Control Research and Technology, SAIC, McLean, VA.

• Peterson, W.W., T.G. Birdsall, and W.C. Fox (1954), “The Theory of Signal Detectability,”Transactions of IRE Professional Group Information Theory, PGIT-4, 171–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Pressman, J.L. and A. Wildavsky (1973),Implementation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Reibman, A. and L.W. Nolte (1987a), “Optimal Detection and Performance of Distributed Sensor Systems,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-23, 24–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Reibman, A. and L.W. Nolte (1987b), “Design and Performance Comparison of Distributed Detection Networks,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-23, 789–797.

  Google Scholar 

• Rochlin, G.I., T.R. LaPorte, and K.H. Roberts (1987), “The Self-Designing High-Reliability Organization: Aircraft Carrier Flight Operations at Sea,”Naval War College Review, Autumn, 76–90.

• Shapley, L. and B. Grofman (1984), “Optimizing Group Judgmental Accuracy in the Presence of Interdependencies,”Public Choice, 43, 329–343.

  Google Scholar 

• Swets, J.A. (1973), “The Relative Operating Characteristic in Psychology.”Science. 182(7), 990–1000.

  Google Scholar 

• Swets, J.A. (1986), “Indices of discrimination or Diagnostic Accuracy: Their ROCs and Implied Models,”Psychological Bulletin, 99(1), 100–117.

  Google Scholar 

• Swets, J.A. (1988), “Measuring the Accuracy of Diagnostic Systems,”Science, 240(3), 1285–1293.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, Z.B., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1991), “An Algorithm for Determining the Decision Thresholds in a Distributed Detection Problem,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-21(1), 231–237.

  Google Scholar 

• Tang, Z.B., K.R. Pattipati, and D.L. Kleinman (1993), “Optimization of Distributed Detection Networks: Part II. Generalized Tree Structures,”IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC-23(1), 211–221.

  Google Scholar 

• Tanner, W.P. Jr. and J.A. Swets (1954), “The Human Use of Information,”Transactions of IRE Professional Group Information Theory, PGIT-4, 213–221.

  Google Scholar 

• Tenney, R.R. and N.R. Sandell Jr. (1981), “Detection with Distributed Sensors,”IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-17, 501–510.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Meter, D. and D. Middleton (1954), “Modern Statistical Approaches to Reception in Communication Theory,”Transactions of IRE Professional Group Information Theory, PGIT-4, 119–141.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Trees, H.L. (1968),Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, Vol. I. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

  Google Scholar 

• Wald, A. (1950),Statistical Decision Functions. New York: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

Download references