[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/ Skip to main content
Log in

Execution characteristics of layered streams

  • Published:
International Journal of Parallel Programming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A layered stream is a list of data structuresH*Ts whereTs is a layered stream containing all possible tails for headH. One performance advantage is the ability toeagerly construct a partial solution by binding headH before the tailsTs are known. This increases potential parallelism. A disadvantage of this facility is that eagerly bindingH can cause consumers of the layered stream to do extra computation if in factTs isuncompletable. In addition, the layered streams can grow very large, the bulk of which is garbage. To combat this space inefficiency, eager term construction can be restricted, thereby reducing parallelism. In this paper we show the trade-offs between potential parallelism, execution time, space and time complexity, for a group of benchmarks implemented with layered streams and streams. We also compare these algorithms to the related paradigms of candidates/noncandidates and fused generate & test.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Okumura and Y. Matsumoto Parallel Programming with Layered Streams,International Symposium on Logic Programming, San Francisco, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 224–233 (August 1987).

  2. R. Trehan, The Behavior of Search Algorithms in a Committed Choice Framework,Proceedings of the Logic Programming Conference, Tokyo, ICOT, pp. 143–157 (1990).

  3. M. Sato and A. Goto, Evaluation of the KL1 Parallel System on a Shared Memory Multiprocessor,IFIP Working Conference on Parallel Processing, Pisa, North Holland, pp. 305–318 (May 1988).

  4. M. Sato,et al. KL1 Execution Model for PIM Cluster with Shared Memory,Fourth International Conference on Logic Programming, University of Melbourne, MIT Press, pp. 338–355 (May 1987).

  5. K. Ueda, Guarded Horn Clauses,Concurrent Prolog: Collected Papers, (ed.), E. Y. Shapiro, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts1:140–156 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Tick,Parallel Logic Programming, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. Lusk,et al. The Aurora Or-Parallel Prolog System,International Conference on Fifth Generation Computer Systems, Tokyo,ICOT, pp. 819–830 (November 1988).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tick, E. Execution characteristics of layered streams. Int J Parallel Prog 19, 425–443 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397626

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01397626

Key Words

Navigation