Relevant deduction

• Ackermann, W.: 1956, ‘Begründung einer strengen Implikation’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, 113–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Anderson, A. R. and Belnap, N. D.: 1975, Entailment. The Logic of Relevance and Necessity, Princeton University Press, Princeton.

  Google Scholar 

• Åqvist, L.: 1984, ‘Deontic Logic’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), pp. 605–714.

• Barwise, J.: 1988, The Situation in Logic, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford.

  Google Scholar 

• Bratko, I.: 1986, Prolog Programming for Artificial Intelligence, Addison-Wesley Publ. Comp., Wokingham.

  Google Scholar 

• Carnap, R.: 1936–37, ‘Testability and Meaning’, Philosophy of Science 3, 419–471 and 4, 1937, 1–40.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carnap, R.: 1956, ‘The Methodological Character of Theoretical Concepts’, in: H. Feigl, and M. Scriven (eds.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. I, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 38–76.

  Google Scholar 

• Cleave, J. P.: 1973–74, ‘An Account of Entailment Based on Classical Semantics’, Analysis 34, 118–122.

  Google Scholar 

• Fitting, M.: 1983, Proof Methods for Modal and Intuitionistic Logics, Reidel, Dordrecht.

  Google Scholar 

• Friedman, M.: 1974, ‘Explanation and Scientific Understanding’, Journal of Philosophy 71, 5–19.

  Google Scholar 

• Glymour, C.: 1980, ‘Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless’, Philosophy of Science 47, 322–325.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Halldén, S. 1951: ‘On the Semantic Non-Completeness of Certain Lewis Calculi’, Journal of Symbolic Logic 16(2), 127–129.

  Google Scholar 

• Harrison, J.: 1972, ‘Ethical Naturalism’, in: P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 3–4, The Macmillan Company & The Free Press, New York, Reprint Edition, pp. 69–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects in Scientific Explanation and Other Essays, Free Press, New York, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Hesse, M.: 1970, ‘Theories and Transitivity of Confirmation’, Philosophy of Science 37, 50–63.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hume, D.: 1739–40: A Treatise of Human Nature, (L. A. Selby-Bigge, ed., Oxford 1888, Reprint 1951), Orig. 1739/40.

• Kitcher, P.: 1976, ‘Comments and Criticism: Explanation, Conjunction and Unification’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 207–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48, 507–531.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kleene, S. C.: 1971, Introduction to Metamathematics, Wolters-Noordhoff Publishing, Groningen.

  Google Scholar 

• Körner, S.: 1947, ‘On Entailment’, Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 21, 143–162.

  Google Scholar 

• Körner, S.: 1959, Conceptual Thinking, Dover Publ., New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Körner, S.: 1979, ‘On Logical Validity and Informal Appropriateness’, Philosophy 54, 377–379.

  Google Scholar 

• Kuipers, T. A. (ed.): 1987, What Is Closer-To-The-Truth?, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of Science and the Humanities, Vol. 10, Rodopi, Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Kutschera, F. v.: 1982, Grundlagen der Ethik, W. de Gruyter, Berlin-New York.

  Google Scholar 

• Lloyd, J.: 1984, Foundations of Logic Programming, Springer, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Miller, D.: 1982, ‘Truth, Truthlikeness, Approximative Truth’, Fundamenta Scientiae, 3(1), 93–101.

  Google Scholar 

• Morscher, E.: 1984, ‘Sein-Sollen-Schlüsse und wie Schlüsse sein sollen’, in W. u.a. Krawietz, (eds.), Theorie der Normen (Festgabe für Ota Weinberger), Duncker and Humblot, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Parry, W.: 1933, ‘Ein Axiomensystem für eine neue Art von Implikation (Analytische Implikation)’, Ergebnisse eines mathematischen Kolloquiums, 4, 5–6.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, K.: 1948, ‘What Can Logic Do For Philosophy?’, Artistotelian Society Proceedings, Suppl. 22, 141–154.

• Popper, K.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, K.: 1976, Logik der Forschung (6. Auflage). J. C. B. Mohr, Tübingen.

  Google Scholar 

• Prior, A. N.: 1954, ‘The Paradoxes of Derived Obligation’, Mind 63, 64–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Prior, A. N.: 1960, ‘The Autonomy of Ethics’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38, 199–206.

  Google Scholar 

• Ross, A.: 1941, ‘Imperatives and Logic’, Theoria 7, 53–71; reprint in Philosophy of Science 11, 1944, pp. 30–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Radnitzky, G.: 1980, ‘From Justifying a Theory to Comparing Theories and Selecting Questions’, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 131–132, 179–228.

  Google Scholar 

• Rautenberg, W.: 1979, Klassische und Nichtklassische Aussagenlogik, Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden.

  Google Scholar 

• Schurz, G.: 1983, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung, Ansätze zu einer logisch-pragmatischen Wissenschaftstheorie, (dissertation), dbv-Verlag für die TU Graz.

• Schurz, G.: 1983b, ‘Das deduktive Relevanzkriterium von Stephan Körner und seine wissenschaftstheoretischen Anwendungen’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 20, 149–177.

  Google Scholar 

• Schurz, G.: 1987, ‘A New Definition of Verisimilitude and its Applications’, in P. Weingartner and G. Schurz (eds.), Logic, Philosophy of Science and Epistemology, Proceedings of the 11th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 177–184.

• Schurz, G.: 1988, ‘Was ist wissenschaftliches Verstehen? Eine Theorie verstehensbewirkender Erklärungsepisoden’, in G. Schurz (ed.), pp. 235–298.

• Schurz, G. (ed.): 1988, Erklären und Verstehen in der Wissenschaft. (With contributions by B. v. Fraassen, P. Gärdenfors, R. Tuomela, M. Friedman, P. Kitcher, G. Schurz and K. Lambert), R. Oldenbourg, München.

  Google Scholar 

• Schurz, G.: 1989, Relevant Deduction in Science and Ethics. With a Case Study of the Is-Ought Problem, (habilitation), Salzburg 1989.

• Schurz, G.: 1990, ‘Paradoxical Consequences of Balzer's and Gähde's Criteria of Theoreticity. Results of an Application to Ten Scientific Theories’, Erkenntnis 32, 161–214.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schurz, G.: 1991, ‘How Far Can Hume's Is-Ought Thesis be Generalized? An Investigation in Alethic-Deontic Modal Predicate Logic’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 20, 37–95.

  Google Scholar 

• Schurz, G. and Weingartner, P.: 1987, ‘Verisimilitude Defined by Relevant Consequence-Elements. A New Reconstruction of Popper's Idea’, in T. A. Kuipers (ed.), pp. 47–78.

• Schurz, G. and Lambert, K.: 1991, ‘Outline of a Theory of Scientific Understanding’, submitted for publication.

• Stegmüller, W.: 1970, Probleme und Resultate der Wissenschaftstheorie und Analytischen Philosophie, Band II, 1. Halbband, Springer, Berlin.

  Google Scholar 

• Stranzinger, R.: 1977, ‘Die Paradoxa der deontischen Logik’, in I. Tammelo and H. Schreiner (eds.), Grundzüge und Grundverfahren der Rechtslogik, Band 2, Verlag Dokumentation (UTB 685), München 1977.

  Google Scholar 

• Weingartner, P. 1985, ‘A Simple Relevance Criterion for Natural Language and Its Semantics’, in G. Dorn and P. Weingartner (eds.), Foundations of Logic and Linguistic, Plenum Press, Salzburg.

  Google Scholar 

• Weingartner, P. and G. Schurz: 1986, ‘Paradoxes Solved by Simple Relevance Criteria’, Logique et Analyse 113, 3–40.

  Google Scholar 

Download references