Abstract
A review of research related to the learning effect of dynamic versus static visual displays in media-based instruction is presented. The analysis reveals that the dynamic visual display (DVD) is generally more effective than the static visual display (SVD). However, the research findings do not consistently support the superior effect of DVDs. These conflicting findings seem to be related to the different theoretical rationales and methodological approaches used in various studies and suggest that the use of DVDs should be determined selectively. From the literature review and theoretical discussions about instructional functions of DVDs, we propose six instructional conditions under which DVDs can be effectively used. The conditions are for: (a) demonstrating sequential actions in a procedural task; (b) simulating causal models of complex system behaviors; (c) explicitly representing invisible system functions and behaviors; (d) illustrating a task which is difficult to describe verbally; (e) providing a visual analogy for an abstract and symbolic concept, and (f) obtaining attention focused on specific tasks or presentation displays. Finally, several important considerations for the design and presentation of DVDs are discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alesandrini, K. L. and Rigney, J. W. (1981). Pictorial presentation and review strategies in science learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18, 465–474.
Anderson, J. R., Boyle, C. F. and Yost, G. (1985). The geometry tutor. Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Los Angeles, 1–7.
Baek, Y. K. and Layne, B. H. (1988). Color, graphics and animation in a computer-assisted learning tutorial lesson. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 15, 131–135.
Blake, T. (1977). Motion in instructional media: some subject-display mode interactions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 975–985.
Caraballo, J. N. (1985). The effect of various display modes in computer-based instruction and language background upon achievement of selected educational objectives. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvanis State University.
Caraballo-Rios, A. L. (1985). An experimental study to investigate the effect of computer animation on the understanding and retention of selected levels of learning outcomes. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. The Pennsylvania State University.
Carpenter, P. A. and Just, M. A. (1992). Understanding mechanical systems through computer animation and kinematic imagery. (Report No. ONR92–1) Arlington, VA: Office of Naval Research.
Clark, J. M. and Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–210.
Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53, 445–460.
Collins, A., Adams, M. and Pew, R. (1978). Effectiveness of an interactive map display in tutoring geography. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 1–7.
diSessa, A. A. (1982). Unlearning Aristotelian physics: a study of knowledge-based learning. Cognitive Science, 6, 37–75.
Freeman, F. N. (1924). Visual education: a comparative study of motion picture and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gentner, D. and Stevens, A. L. (1983). Mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
Goldstein, A. G., Chance, J. E., Hoisington, M. and Buescher, K. (1982). Recognition memory for pictures: dynamic versus static stimuli. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 37–40.
Good, R. (1987). Artificial intelligence and science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 325–342.
Guthrie, E. R. (1935). The psychology of learning. New York: Harper and Row.
Hollan, J. D., Hutchins, E. L. and Weitzman, L. (1983). STEAMER: an interactive inspectable simulation-based training system. The AI Magazine, 2, 15–27.
Hollis, A. P. (1924). The effectiveness of the film and demonstration in teaching cooking. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion pictures and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Hollis, A. P. (1927). Motion picture for instruction. New York: The Century Company.
James, H. W. (1924). The relative effectiveness of six forms of lesson presentation. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion picture and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kaiser, M. K., Proffitt, D. R. and Anderson, K. (1985). Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 11, 795–803.
King, W. A. (1975). A comparison of three combinations of text and graphics for concept learning. (Report No. NPRDC-TR-76–16). San Diego, CA: Navy Personnel Research and Development Center. (ERIC Document Service No. ED112936)
Klein, D. (1987). Conditions affecting the effectiveness of animated and non-animated displays in computer-based instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Oakland, CA.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kozma, R. B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61, 179–211.
Lamb, M. (1982). Interactive graphical modeling game for teaching musical concepts. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 9, 59–63.
Laner, S. (1954). The impact of visual aid displays showing a manipulative task. Quarterly Review of Experimental Psychology, 6, 95–106.
Laner, S. (1955). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of a training film. British Journal of Psychology, 46, 280–294.
Lesgold, A., Levin, J., Shimron, J. and Gutterman, J. (1975). Pictures and young children's learning from oral prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 636–642.
Lesogold, A., McCormick, C. and Gollinkoff, R. (1975). Imagery training and children's prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 663–667.
Levie, W. and Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: a review of research. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30, 195–232.
Levin, J., Anglin, G. and Carney, R. (1987). On empirically validating functions of pictures in prose. In D., Willows and H., Houghton (Eds.), The psychology of illustration, volume 2: instructional issues (pp. 51–85). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Levin, J. and Lesgold, A. (1978). On pictures in prose. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 26, 233–243.
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958a). Attention directed to parts of a film. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films (pp. 84–106). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958b). Cue and response function in pictures and words. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films (pp. 123–149). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lumsdaine, A. A. (1961). Student response in programmed instruction. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Lumsdaine, A. A., Sulzer, R. L. and Kopstein, F. F. (1961). The effect of animation cues and repetition of examples on learning from an instructional film. In A. A., Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction, (pp. 241–269). Washington, DC: National Research Council.
May, M. A. (1958). Verbal responses to demonstration films. In M. A., May and A. A., Lumsdaine (Eds.), Learning from films. New Haven: Yale University Press.
May, M. A. and Lumsdaine, A. A. (1958). Learning from films. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mayer, R. E. and Anderson, R. B. (1991). Animations need narrations: an experimental test of a dualcoding hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 484–490.
McCloskey, M. and Kohl, D. (1983). Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 9, 146–156.
McClusky, F. D. and McClusky, H. Y. (1924). Comparison of six modes of presentation of subject matter. In F. N., Freeman (Ed.), Visual education: a comparative study of motion pictures and other methods of instruction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
McGuire, W. J. (1955/1961). Some factors influencing the effectiveness of demonstrational films: repetition of instructions, slow motion, distributed showing and explanatory narration. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction, (pp. 187–207). Place?: National Research Council.
Moore, M. V. and Nawrocki, L. H. (1978). The educational effectiveness of graphic displays for computer assisted instruction. (Report No. ARI-TP 332) Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences. (NTIS No. AD AO62585).
Moore, M., Nawrocki, L. and Simutis, Z. (1979). The instructional effectiveness of three levels of graphics displays for computer-assisted instruction. (Report No. ARI-TP-359). Arlington, VA: Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences (ERIC Document Service No. ED 178–057).
Newman, D., Gringneti, M., Gross, M. and Massey, L. D. (1992). Intelligent conduct of fire trainer: intelligent technology applied to simulation-based training. In M. J. Farr and J. Psotka, Intelligent instruction by computer: theory and practice (pp. 239–250). Washington: Taylor and Francis, 239–250.
Norman, D. (1982). Learning and memory. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representations: a dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
Papert, S. (1972). Teaching children thinking. Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 9, 245–255.
Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.
Park, O. and Gittelman, S. (in press). Selective use of animation and feedback in computer-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology. Educational Technology Research and Development, 40, 27–38.
Peters, H. J. and Daiker, K. C. (1982). Graphics and animation as instructional tools: a case study. Pipeline, 7, 11–13.
Pressley, M. (1976). Mental imagery helps eight-year-olds remembers what they read. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 355–359.
Pressley, M. (1977). Imagery and children's learning: putting the picture in developmental perspective, Review of Educational Research, 47, 585–622.
Reed, S. K. (1985). Effects of computer graphics on improving estimates to algebra word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 285–298.
Rieber, L. P. (1989). The effects of computer animated elaboration strategies and practice on factual and application learning in an elementary science lesson. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5, 431–444.
Rieber, L. P. (1990a). Using computer animated graphics in science instruction with children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 135–140.
Rieber, L. P. (1990b). Animation in computer-based instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38, 77–86.
Rieber, L. P. (1991). Animation, incidental learning and continuing motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318–328.
Rieber, L. P., Boyce, M. J. and Assad, C. (1990). The effects of computer animation on adult learning and retrieval tasks. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17, 46–52.
Rieber, L. P. and Hannafin, M. J. (1988). The effects of textual and animated orienting activities and practice on learning from computer-based instruction. Computers in the Schools, 5, 77–89.
Reiber, L. P. and Kini, A. S. (1991). Theoretical foundations of instructional applications computer-generated animated visuals. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 18, 83–86.
Reif, F. (1987). Instructional design, cognition and technology: applications to the teaching of scientific concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24, 309–324.
Reiser, B. J., Beekelaar, R., Tyle, A. and Merrill, D. (1991). GIL: Scaffolding learning to program with reasoning-congruent representations. CSL Report 48, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Cognitive Science Laboratory.
Reiser, R. A. and Gagné, R. M. (1982). Characteristics of media selection models. Review of Educational Research, 52, 499–512.
Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., Lovett, M. C. and Kimberg, D. Y. (1989). Facilitating students' reasoning with causal explanations and visual representations. In D., Bierman, J., Breuker and J., Sanberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Springfield, VA: IOS.
Rigney, J. W. and Lutz, K. A. (1976). Effects of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305–311.
Roshal, S. M. (1961). Film mediated learning with varying representations of the task: viewing angle, portrayal of demonstration, motion and student participation. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 155–175). National Research Council.
Sheffield, F. D. (1961). Theoretical considerations in the learning of Complex Sequential tasks from demonstration and practice. In A. A. Lumsdaine (Ed.), Student response in programmed instruction (pp. 31–52). National Research Council.
Silverman, R. E. (1958). The comparative effectiveness of animated and static transparences. (Report No. NTDC-TR 78–1). Port Washington, NY: US Naval Training Device Center.
Skinner, B. F. (1954). The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 24, 86–97.
Skinner, B. F. (1963). Operant behavior. American Psychologist, 18, 503–515.
Spangenberg, R. W. (1973). The motion variable in procedural learning. Audio-Visual Communication Review, 21, 419–436.
Swezey, R. W., Perez, R. S. and Allen, J. A. (1991). Effects of instructional strategy and motion presentation conditions on the acquisition and transfer of electro-mechanical trouble-shooting skill. Human Factors, 33, 309–323.
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational psychology, volume 2: the psychology of learning. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Towne, D. M., Munroe, A., Pizzini, Q. A. and Surmon, D. S. (1987). Representing system behaviors and expert behaviors for intelligent tutoring. Technical Report No. 108. Los Angeles: Behavioral Technology Laboratories, University of Southern California.
White, B. (1984). Designing computer games to help physics students understand Newton's laws of motion. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 69–108.
Withrow, M. (1978). Computer animation and language instruction. American Annual of the Deaf, 123, 723–725.
Withrow, M. (1979). Illustrating language through computer generated animation. American Annual of the Deaf, 124, 549–592.
Woolf, B., Blegan, D., Jansen, J. and Verloop, A. (1986). Teaching a complex industrial process. Philadelphia, PA: National Association of Artificial Intelligence.
Wundt, W. (1912). An introduction to psychology. London: G. Allen and Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, OC., Hopkins, R. Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: a review. Instr Sci 21, 427–449 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118557
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118557