A New Method for Defining Scale to Estimate the Aspects Oriented Sentiment Polarity of the Tweets

1. Yohan, J., Alice H.: Aspect and sentiment unification model for online review analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, pp. 815–824 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/1935826.1935932

2. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Pavlopoulos, J., Papageorgiou, H., Androutsopoulos, I., Manandhar, S.: Semeval-2014 task 4: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp.27–35. Association for Computational Linguistics (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/S14-2004

3. Pontiki, M., Galanis, D., Papageorgiou, H., Manandhar, S., Androutsopoulos, I.: Semeval-2015 task 12: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 486–495. Association for Computational Linguistics (2015). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S15-2082

4. Pontiki, M., et al.: Semeval-2016 task 5: aspect based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016), pp. 19–30. Association for Computational Linguistics (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/S16-1002

5. Bo, P.: Lee, L: Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found. Trends® Inf. Retrieval 2(1–2), 1–135 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1561/1500000011

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Miguel, A., Martinez, E., Julio, V., Janine, G.: Tass 2015–the evolution of the spanish opinion mining systems. Procesamiento Lenguaje Nat. 56, 33–40 (2016)

   Google Scholar 

7. Hang, C., Mittal, V., Datar, M.: Comparative experiments on sentiment classification for online product reviews. In: AAAI 2006 proceedings of the 21st national conference on Artificial intelligence, vol. 6, pp. 1265–1270 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

8. Paltoglou, G., Thelwall, M.: Twitter, MySpace, Digg: unsupervised sentiment analysis in social media. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 3(4) (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2337542.2337551

9. Li, G., Liu, F.: A clustering-based approach on sentiment analysis. In: 2010 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Systems and Knowledge Engineering, pp. 331–337 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISKE.2010.5680859

10. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), pp. 1320–1326 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

11. Han, B., Baldwin, T.: Lexical normalisation of short text messages: Makn sens a# Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 368–378 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

12. Ruiz, P., Cuadros, M., Etchegoyhen, T.: Lexical normalization of spanish tweets with preprocessing rules, domain-specific edit distances, and language models. In: Proceedings of the Tweet Normalization Workshop at the Conference of the Spanish Society for Natural Language Processing (SEPLN) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

13. Wang, X., Wei, F., Liu, X., Zhou, M., Zhang, M.: Topic sentiment analysis in twitter: a graph-based hashtag sentiment classification approach. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1031–1040 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1145/2063576.2063726

14. Santos, C., Gatti, M.: Deep convolutional neural networks for sentiment analysis of short texts. In: Proceedings of COLING 2014, the 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 69–78 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

15. Bermingham, A., Smeaton. A.: On using Twitter to monitor political sentiment and predict election results. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Sentiment Analysis Where AI Meets Psychology (SAAIP 2011), pp. 2–10 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

16. Wagner, J., et al.: DCU: aspect-based polarity classification for semeval task 4. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 223–229 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/S14-2036

17. Kiritchenko, S., Zhu, X., Cherry, C., Mohammad, S.: NRC-Canada-2014: detecting aspects and sentiment in customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 437–442 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/S14-2076

18. Nguyen, T., Shirai, K.: PhraseRNN: phrase recursive neural network for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 2509–2514 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D15-1298

19. Wang, Y., Huang, M., Zhao, L., Zhu, X.: Attention-based LSTM for aspect-level sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 606–615 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1058

20. Tang, D., Qin, B., Feng, X., Liu, T.: Effective LSTMs for target-dependent sentiment classification. In: Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers, pp. 3298–3307 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

21. Tang, D., Qin, B., Liu, T.: Aspect level sentiment classification with deep memory network. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. pp. 214–224 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1021

22. Wang, B., Liakata, M., Zubiaga A., Procter R.: TDParse: multi-target-specific sentiment recognition on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, vol. 1, pp. 483–493 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

23. Sonawane, S., Kolhe, S.: Feature optimization in sentiment analysis by term co-occurrence fitness evolution (TCFE). Int. J. Inf. Technol. Web Eng. (IJITWE), 14(3), 16–36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.4018/IJITWE.2019070102

24. Liu, F., Cohn, T., Baldwin, T.: Recurrent entity networks with delayed memory update for targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2018, pp. 278–283 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N18-2045

25. https://www.kaggle.com/kazanova/sentiment140. Accessed 24 Aug 2019

26. McSherry, F., Najork, M.: Computing information retrieval performance measures efficiently in the presence of tied scores. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 414–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-78646-7_38

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references