[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Theory of Opinion Distribution in Human Relations Where Trust and Distrust Mixed

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Decision Technologies (IDT 2020)

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 193))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we simulated based on the theory of the dynamics of a recent new opinion that incorporates both trust and distrust in human relationships. As a result, it was observed that the aspect of consensus building depends on the ratio between the confidence coefficient and the distrust coefficient. For the model proposed in this study, the ratio of confidence factor to mistrust tended to change, like a phase transition near 55%. This implies that 55% of the connections between people are sufficient for a Esociety to reach consensus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 143.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
GBP 179.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., Loreto, V.: Statistical physics of social dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 591–646 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sîrbu, A., Loreto, V., Servedio, V.D.P., Tria, F.: Opinion dynamics: models, extensions and external effects. In: Loreto, V., et al. (eds.) Participatory Sensing, Opinions and Collective Awareness. Understanding Complex Systems. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deffuant, G., Neau, D., Amblard, F., Weisbuch, G.: Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Adv. Complex Syst. 3, 87–98 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weisbuch, G., Deffuant, G., Amblard, F., Nadal, J.P.: Meet, discuss and Segéregate! Complexity 7(3), 55–63 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hegselmann, R., Krause, U.: Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence models, analysis, and simulation. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 5, 1–33 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: Opinion dynamics theory for analysis of consensus formation and division of opinion on the internet. In: Proceedings of The 22nd Asia Pacific Symposium on Intelligent and Evolutionary Systems, pp. 71–76 (2018). arXiv:1812.11845 [physics.soc-ph]

  7. Ishii, A.: Opinion dynamics theory considering trust and suspicion in human relations. In: Morais D., Carreras A., de Almeida A., Vetschera R. (eds.) Group Decision and Negotiation: Behavior, Models, and Support. GDN 2019. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 351, pp. 193–204. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y.: Opinion dynamics theory considering interpersonal relationship of trust and distrust and media effects. In: The 33rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, vol 33. JSAI2019 2F3-OS-5a-05 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal, A, Xie, B., Vovsha, I., Rambow, O. and Passonneau, R.: Sentiment analysis of twitter data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media, pp. 30–38. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siersdorfer, S., Chelaru, S. and Nejdl, W.: How useful are your comments?: Analyzing and predicting youtube comments and comment ratings. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 891–900 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, T., Wiebe, J., Hoffmann, P.: Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 347–354 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sasahara, H., Chen, W., H Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., Menczer, F.: On the Inevitability of Online Echo Chambers (2020). arXiv:1905.03919v2

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP19K04881 and “R1 Leading Initiative for Excellent Young Researchers(LEADER)” based on Japan Society for the Promotion of Science(JSPS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Ishii .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ishii, A., Kawahata, Y. (2020). Theory of Opinion Distribution in Human Relations Where Trust and Distrust Mixed. In: Czarnowski, I., Howlett, R., Jain, L. (eds) Intelligent Decision Technologies. IDT 2020. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 193. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-5925-9_40

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics