[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

GOASREP: Goal Oriented Approach for Software Requirements Elicitation and Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 516))

Abstract

Software requirements elicitation is a valuable process for the identification of software requirements according to the need of different types of stakeholders. There are different methods for the elicitation of software requirements like traditional methods, group elicitation methods, goal oriented methods, etc. Among these methods, goal oriented methods have received much recognition by software requirements engineering community. On the basis of our literature review, we identify that “goal oriented requirements elicitation processes do not support how to select and prioritize the requirements using analytic hierarchy process on the basis of the cost and effort criteria”. Therefore, in-order to address this issue, we proposed a method, i.e. GOASREP, for the elicitation of software requirements using “goal oriented approach” and the prioritization of the elicited requirements using “analytic hierarchy process”. In the proposed method, we used function point analysis approach for the estimation of the cost of each requirement. COCOMO model has been applied to estimate the effort of each requirement. Finally, the usage of the GOASREP is explained using Institute Examination System.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 223.50
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 279.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. P. Achimugu, A. Selamat, R. Ibrahim, M. Mahrin, A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research. Inf. Softw. Technol. 56, 868–870 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. B.C. Chrobot, What is the Cost of One IFPUG Method Function Point? Case Study. worldcomp-proceedings.com/proc/p 2012/SER2400.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  3. W. Ho, X. Xu, P.K. Dey, Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 202, 16–24 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Sadiq, S.K. Jain, A fuzzy based approach for the selection of goals in goal oriented requirements elicitation process. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Maintenance, Springer 6(2), 157–164 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Sadiq, S. Ghafir, M. Shahid, An approach for eliciting software requirements and its prioritization using analytic hierarchy process, in IEEE International Conference on Advances in Recent Technologies in Communication and Computing, Kerala, India (2009), pp. 790–795

    Google Scholar 

  6. M. Sadiq, S.K. Jain, An insight into requirements engineering processes, in 3rd International Conference on Advances in Communication, Network, and Computing, ed. by V.V. Das, J. Stephen (LNCSIT-Springer, Heidelberg, Chennai, India, 2012), pp. 313–318

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Sadiq, S.K. Jain, Applying fuzzy preference relation for requirements prioritization in goal oriented requirements elicitation process. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Maintenance, Springer 5(4), 711–723 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Sadiq, M. Shahid, Elicitation and prioritization of software requirements. Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. 2(3), 138–142 (2009). Academy Publisher, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Sadiq, J. Ahmad, M. Asim, A. Qureshi, R. Suman, More on elicitation of software requirements and prioritization using AHP, in IEEE International Conference on Data Storage and Data Engineering, Bangalore, India (2010), pp. 232–236

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Sadiq, M. Asim, J. Ahmed, V. Kumar, S. Khan, Prediction of software project effort estimation: a case study. IACSIT Int. J. Model. Optim. Singap. 1(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. M. Sadiq, S.K. Jain, A fuzzy based approach for requirements prioritization in goal oriented requirements elicitation process, in 25th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, Boston, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd. Sadiq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Garg, N., Sadiq, M., Agarwal, P. (2017). GOASREP: Goal Oriented Approach for Software Requirements Elicitation and Prioritization Using Analytic Hierarchy Process. In: Satapathy, S., Bhateja, V., Udgata, S., Pattnaik, P. (eds) Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Frontiers in Intelligent Computing: Theory and Applications . Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 516. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3156-4_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3156-4_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-3155-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-3156-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics