Abstract
In multi-agent systems, agents often interact with each others to achieves their own goals. In open dynamic systems, trust between agents become a critical challenge to make such interactions effective. Many trust models have been proposed to formalise this concept. These models are such good for dealing with trust by proposing components that present a computational form of this concept and a learning strategies to manage it. Components and learning strategies differs from one model to another. This diversity may influence the decision of a user about the best trust model to use in his system. A comparative study is needed to evaluate each trust model and to show the prediction quality of each one. Several testbeds for the evaluation of trust models have been proposed. However, those testbeds are not flexible enough to handle different scenarios in various contexts. In this paper we formulate a practical method based on a framework that introduce the trust concept into open distributed systems, and a testbed that can be used to evaluate trust models in different contexts.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Mutaz, M., Malott, L., Chellappan, S.: Detecting Sybil attacks in vehicular networks. J. Trust Manage. 1–19 (2014)
Pinyol, I., Sabater, J.: Computational trust and reputation models for open multi-agent systems: a review. Artif. Intell. Rev. 40, 1–25 (2013)
Teacy, W.T.L., Patel, J., Jennings, N.R., Luck, M.: Travos: Trust and reputation in the context of inaccurate information sources. Auton. Agents Multi-Agent Syst. (AAMAS), 12(2), 183–198 (2006)
Audun, J., Roslan, I.: The beta reputation system. In: Proceedings of the 15th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference, pp. 324–337 (2002)
Victor, P., Cornelis, C., De Cock, M.: Trust Networks for Recommender Systems, vol. 4 (2011)
Sabater, J., Paolucci, M., Conte, R.: Repage: reputation and image among limited autonomous partners. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 9(2) (2006)
Patel, J., Teacy, W.L., Jennings, N.R., Luck, M.: A probabilistic trust model for handling inaccurate reputation sources. In: Trust Management, pp. 193–209. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2005)
Massa, P., Avesani, P.: Trust-aware collaborative filtering for recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Federated International Conference on the Move to Meaningful Internet, pp. 492–508 (2004)
Fullam, K., Klos, T., Muller, G., Sabater, J., Topol, Z., Barber, K.S., Rosenschein, J., Vercouter, L.: The agent reputation and trust (ART) testbed architecture. In: Proceedings of Workshop on Trust in Agent Societies, (AAMAS-05), pp. 50–62 (2005)
Kerr, R., Cohen, R.: TREET: The trust and reputation experimentation and evaluation testbed. Electron. Commerce Res. 10(3–4), 271–290 (2010)
Jelenc, D., Hermoso, R., Sabater-Mir, J., Trček, D.: Decision making matters: a better way to evaluate trust models. Knowl.-Based Syst. 147–164 (2013)
Zhang, L., Jiang, S., Zhang, J., Ng, W.K.: Robustness of trust models and combinations for handling unfair ratings. In: Trust Management VI, pp. 36–51. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2012)
Mifrah, Y., En-Nouaary, A., Dahchour, M.: An abstract framework for introducing computational trust models in JADE-based multi-agent systems. In: Advances in Ubiquitous Networking, pp. 513–523. Springer, Singapore (2015)
The JAVA Agent DEvelopment Framework. http://jade.tilab.com/
Multiagent Development Kit. http://www.madkit.net
Tryllian’s Agent Development Kit. http://www.tryllian.com/adk.html
Kirn, S., Herzog, O., Lockemann, P., Spaniol, O.: Multiagent Engineering, Theory and Applications in Enterprises, pp. 503–530 (2006)
Parker, C.: An analysis of performance measures for binary classifiers. In: 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 517–526, Dec 2011
Jurman, G., Riccadonna, S., Furlanello, C.: A Comparison of MCC and CEN Error Measures in Multi-class Prediction (2012)
Huang, J., Ling, C.X.: Constructing new and better evaluation measures for machine learning. In: IJCAI, pp. 859–864, Jan 2007
Hernández-Orallo, J., Flach, P., Ferri, C.: A unified view of performance metrics: translating threshold choice into expected classification loss. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13(1), 2813–2869 (2012)
Jonker, C.M., Treur, J.: A dynamic perspective on an agent’s mental states and interaction with its environment. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, AAMAS’02, 2002, pp. 865–872. ACM Press (2002)
Burete, R., Bădică, A., Bădică, C.: Reputation model with forgiveness factor for semi-competitive e-business agent societies. In: Networked Digital Technologies, pp. 402–416. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mifrah, Y., En-Nouaary, A., Dahchour, M. (2017). Toward a Practical Method for Introducing and Evaluating Trust Learning Models in Open Multi-agent Systems. In: El-Azouzi, R., Menasche, D.S., Sabir, E., De Pellegrini, F., Benjillali, M. (eds) Advances in Ubiquitous Networking 2. UNet 2016. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 397. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_45
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-1627-1_45
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-1626-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-1627-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)