The Information State Approach to Dialogue Management

• Lars Ahrenberg, Nils Dahlback, and Arne Jensson. Discourse representation and discourse management for a natural language dialogue system. In Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, 1990.

  Google Scholar 

• James F. Allen, George Ferguson, and Amanda Stent. An architecture for more realistic conversational systems. In Proceedings Intelligent User Interfaces 2001 (IUI 01), pages 1–8, 2001.

  Google Scholar 

• Nate Blaylock, James Allen, and George Ferguson. Synchronization in an asynchronous agent-based architecture for dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 1–10, Philadelphia, July 2002. Association for Computational Linguistics.

  Google Scholar 

• Peter Bohlin, Robin Cooper, Elisabet Engdahl, and Staffan Larsson. Information states and dialogue move engines. In Proceedings of the 1JCA199 workshop: Knowledge And Reasoning in Practical Dialogue Systems, pages 25–31, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Johan Bos, Peter Bohlin, Staffan Larsson, Ian Lewin, and Colin Matheson. Evaluation of the model with respect to restricted dialogue systems. Technical Report Deliverable D3.2, Trindi, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• P. Breuer and M. D. Sadek. A rational agent as the kernel of a cooperative spoken dialogue system: Implementing a logical theory of interaction. In J. P. Muller, M. J. Wooldridge, and N. R. Jennings, editors, Intelligent Agents III — Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages (ATAL-96), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Carl Burke, Lisa Harper, and Dan Loehr. A dialogue architecture for multimodal control of robots. In Proceedings of the International CLASS Workshop on Natural, Intelligent and Effective Interaction in Multimodal Dialogue Systems., June 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Herbert H. Clark and Edward F. Schaefer. Collaborating on contributions to conversation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 2:1–23, 1987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Phil Cohen. Dialogue modeling. In Ron Cole, Joseph Mariani, Hans Uszkoreit, Annie Zaenen, and Victor Zue, editors, Survey of the State of the Art of Human Language Technology, chapter 6.3. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• Robin Cooper and Staffan Larsson. Dialogue moves and information states. In H.C. Bunt and E. C. G. Thijsse, editors, Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Computational Semantics, pages 398–400, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• R. Cooper, S. Larsson, C. Matheson, M. Poesio, and D. Traum. Coding instructional dialogue for information states. Deliverable D1.1, Trindi Project, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• M. Core, J. Moore, and C. Zinn. Supporting constructive learning with a feedback planner. In Papers from the AAAI Fall Symposium on Building Dialogue Systems for Tutorial Applications., 2000. Technical Report FS-00-01, American Association for Articial Intelligence, 445 Burgess Drive, Menlo Park CA 94025.

  Google Scholar 

• Discourse Resource Initiative. Standards for dialogue coding in natural language processing. Report no. 167, Dagstuhl-Seminar, 1997.

  Google Scholar 

• J. Ginzburg. Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In Jerry Seligman and Dag Westerstahl, editors, Logic, Language and Computation, Vol. 1, pages 221–237. CSLI Publications, 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• J. Ginzburg. Interrogatives: Questions, facts and dialogue. In Shalom Lappin, editor, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, pages 385–422. Blackwell, Oxford, 1996.

  Google Scholar 

• J. Ginzburg. Clarifying utterances. In J. Hulstijn and A. Niholt, editors, Proc. of the Twente Workshop on the Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogues, pages 11–30, Enschede, 1998. Universiteit Twente, Faculteit Informatica.

  Google Scholar 

• Michael Johnston, Srinivas Bangalore, Gunaranjan Vasireddy, Amanda Stent, Patrick Ehlen, Marilyn Walker, Steve Whittaker, and Preetam Maloor. Match: An architecture for multimodal dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL), pages 376–383, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• H. Kamp and U. Reyle. From Discourse to Logic. D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1993.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• J. E. Laird, A. Newell, and P. S. Rosenbloom. SOAR: an architecture for general intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 33(1):1–64, September 1987.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Staffan Larsson, Peter Bohlin, Johan Bos, and David Traum. Trindikit manual. Technical Report Deliverable D2.2 — Manual, Trindi, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• Staffan Larsson, Alexander Berman, Peter Ljunglüf, and David Traum. Implemented siridus system architecture (trindikit 3.0 manual). Technical Report Deliverable D6.4 — Manual, SIRIDUS, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Staffan Larsson. Issue-based Dialogue Management. PhD thesis, Güteborg University, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Ian Lewin. The autoroute dialogue demonstrator. Technical Report CRC-073, SRI Cambridge Computer Science Research Centre, 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• David K. Lewis. Scorekeeping in a language game. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 8(3):339–359, 1979.

  Google Scholar 

• David L. Martin, Adam J. Cheyer, and Douglas B. Moran. The open agent architecture: A framework for building distributed software systems. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 13(1–2):91–128, January-March 1999.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Colin Matheson, Massimo Poesio, and David Traum. Modelling grounding and discourse obligations using update rules. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Catherine Pelachaud, Valeria Carofiglio, Beradina De Carolis, Fiorella de Rosis, and Isabella Poggi. Embodied contextual agent in information delivering application. In Proceedings of the first International Joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent systems, pages 758–765, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Massimo Poesio and David R. Traum. Conversational actions and discourse situations. Computational Intelligence, 13(3), 1997.

  Google Scholar 

• Massimo Poesio and David R. Traum. Towards an axiomatization of dialogue acts. In Proceedings of Twendial’98, 13th Twente Workshop on Language Technology: Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, pages 207–222, 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• M. Poesio, R. Cooper, S. Larsson, C. Matheson, and D. Traum. Annotating conversations for information state update. In Proceedings of Amstelogue’ 99 workshop on the semantics and pragmatics of dialogue, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• David Sadek and Renato De Mori. Dialogue systems. In R. De Mori, editor, Spoken Dialogues with Computers. Academic Press, 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• John R. Searle. Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1969.

  Google Scholar 

• S. Sutton and R. Cole. Universal speech tools: the cslu toolkit. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), pages 3221–3224, 1998.

  Google Scholar 

• David R. Traum and James F. Allen. Discourse obligations in dialogue processing. In Proceedings of the 32^nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 1–8, 1994.

  Google Scholar 

• David R. Traum and Elizabeth A. Hinkelman. Conversation acts in task-oriented spoken dialogue. Computational Intelligence, 8(3):575–599, 1992. Special Issue on Non-literal language.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• David R. Traum and Jeff Rickel. Embodied agents for multi-party dialogue in immersive virtual worlds. In Proceedings of the first International Joint conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent systems, pages 766–773, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• David Traum, Johan Bos, Robin Cooper, Staffan Larsson, Ian Lewin, Colin Matheson, and Massimo Poesio. A model of dialogue moves and information state revision. Technical Report Deliverable D2.1, Trindi, 1999.

  Google Scholar 

• David R. Traum. A Computational Theory of Grounding in Natural Language Conversation. PhD thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester, 1994. Also available as TR 545, Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester.

  Google Scholar 

• David R. Traum. 20 questions for dialogue act taxonomies. Journal of Semantics, 17(1):7–30, 2000.

  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references