Why Adopting Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) Takes so Much Time

• Andriessen, V. “Nederlandse Internetzoekmachine Ixquick ontvangt eerste Europese privacycertificaat.” In Het Financieele Dagblad,15 juli 2008.

  Google Scholar 

• Bayer, J., and N. Melone. “A Critique of Diffusion Theory as a Managerial Framework for Understanding Adoption of Software Engineering Innovations.” The Journal of Systems and Software 9, 2 (1989): 161–166.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Blakley, B., E. McDermott, and D. Geer. Information management is Information Risk Management. in Proceedings NSPW’01, Cloudecroft, New Mexico, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Borking, J. “The Status of Privacy Enhancing Technologies.” In Certification and Security in E-Services. E. Nardelli, S. Posadziejewsji, and M. Talomo. Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, p. 223.

  Google Scholar 

• Borking, J.J. “Assessing investments mitigating privacy risks.” In Het binnenste buiten, Liber Amicorum ter gelegenheid van het emeritaat van prof. dr. H.J. Schmidt, hoogleraar Recht en Informatica te Leiden, edited by L. Mommers, H. Franken, J. Van den Herik, F. Vander Klauw, and G-J. Zwenne. Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2010.

  Google Scholar 

• Borking, J.J. “The Business Case for PET and the EuroPrise Seal,” Report for EuroPrise EU Research project on Privacy Seals 2008; http://www.european-privacy-seal.eu/about-europrise/fact-sheet

• Borking, J.J.F.M. Privacyrecht is Code, Over Het Gebruik van Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Deventer: Kluwer, 2010.

  Google Scholar 

• Bos, Tj. Adoptie van privacy-enhancing technologies bij publiek/private instellingen. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken, 2006.

  Google Scholar 

• Camp, L.J., and C. Wolfram. Pricing Security. in Proceedings of the CERT Information, Survivability Workshop, Kluwer Academic Press, Boston MA, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Cardholm, L. Adding Value to Business Performance Through Cost Benefit Analyses of Information Security Management, Thesis, Gävle, 2006.

  Google Scholar 

• Cas, J., and Ch. Hafskjold. Access in ICT and Privacy in Europe, Experiences from technology assessment of ICT and Privacy in seven different European countries. Geneva: EPTA, 2006, p. 41.

  Google Scholar 

• Chapman, S., and G.S. Dhillon. Privacy and the Internet: The Case of DoubleClick, Inc. – Social Responsibility in the Information Age: Issues and Responsibilities. XXX, Fort Lauderdale-Davie, 2002.

  Google Scholar 

• Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on Promoting Data Protection by Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs), COM (2007) 228 Final, Brussels, 2.5.2007.

  Google Scholar 

• Darwin. http://www.tech-404.com/calculator.html, 2007, 2008.

• Davenport, Th.H. Process Innovation – Reengineering work through Information Technology. Boston, MA: Havard Business School Press, 1993.

  Google Scholar 

• Fagerberg, J. et al. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press Oxford, 2005.

  Google Scholar 

• Fairchild, A., and P. Ribbers. “Privacy-Enhancing Identity Management in Business.” In Privacy and Identity Management for Europe, edited by J. Camenish, R. Leenes, and Sommer, D. Report for the EU Commission X, Brussels, 2008, pp. 69–100.

  Google Scholar 

• Fichman, R.G. Information Technology Diffusion: A Review of Empirical Research. in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Dallas, (1992), pp. 195–206.

  Google Scholar 

• Greenhalgh, T., et al. “Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review en recommendations.” The Milbank Quarterly 4 (2004): 581–629.

  Google Scholar 

• Hahn, U., K. Askelson, and R. Stiles. Managing and Auditing Privacy Risks, ltamonte Springs, 2008 http://www.theiia.org/guidance/technology/gtag/gtag5/

• Hes, R., and J. Borking. Privacy Enhancing Technologies: The Path to Anonymity (2nd revised edition). Report from the Dutch Data Protection Authority AV no. 11 Den Haag, 2000.

  Google Scholar 

• Jeyaraj, A., J.W. Rottman, and M.C. Lacity. “A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research.” Journal of Information Technology 21, 1 (2006): 1–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Koorn, R., H. Van Gils, J. Ter Hart, P. Overbeek, P. Tellegen, and J. Borking. Privacy Enhancing Technologies – Witboek voor Beslissers; (Whitebook for Decision Makers – Ministry of Internal Affairs and Kingdom Relations) Den Haag, 2004.

  Google Scholar 

• Leisner, I., and J. Cas. Convenience in ICT and Privacy in Europe, Experiences from technology assessment of ICT and Privacy in seven different European countries. Geneva: EPTA, 2006, p. 50.

  Google Scholar 

• OECD Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Oslo Manual: Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd edition, 2005. Available at: http://www.oecd.org/

• PRIME, acronym for project name: Privacy and Identity Management for Europe, Contract No. 507591 Research period 2004–2008

  Google Scholar 

• Privacy Rights Clearinghouse: A Chronology of Data Breaches. 2007. Available at: http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/ChronDataBreaches.htm#CP

• Rivera, M.A., and E.M. Rogers. “Evaluating public sector innovation in networks: extending the reach of the national cancer institute’s web bases health communication intervention research initiative.” The Innovation Journal: The public Sector Innovation Journal 9, (2004): 1–5.

  Google Scholar 

• Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2003.

  Google Scholar 

• Smit, N. A maturity Model. Zoetermeer: EUR, 2005.

  Google Scholar 

• Sommer, D. “The PRIME Architecture.” In Privacy and Identity Management for Europein, edited by J. Camenish, R. Leenes, and D. Sommer. Report for the EU Commission, Brussels, 2008.

  Google Scholar 

• Sonnenreich, W., J. Albanese, and B. Stout. “Return on Security Investment (ROSI) A practical approach.” Journal of Research and Practice in Information Technology 38, 1, (Feb. 2006).

  Google Scholar 

• Stanford Organizational Maturity Levels, http://www2.slac.stanford.edu/comp/winnt/systemadministration/Organizational%20Maturity%20Levels.doc

• Tidd, J., et al. Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market and Organizational Change, Chichester: Wiley, John & Sons, Incorporated, 2005.

  Google Scholar 

• Tsiakis, T., and G. Stephanides. “The Economic Approach of Information Security.” Computers & Security 24, 2005.

  Google Scholar 

• Tung, L.L., and O. Reck. “Adoption of electronic government services among business organizations in Singapore.” Journal of Strategic Information Systems 14, (2005): 417–440.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van Blarkom, G.W, J.J Borking, and J.G.E Olk. Handbook of Privacy and Privacy-Enhancing Technologies, The Case of Intelligent Software Agents. The Hague: College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens, 2003, pp. 22–30.

  Google Scholar 

• Van Gestel, G.P.C. Creating an Identity and Access Management Maturity Model, Thesis, Universiteit van Tilburg, Tilburg, 2007.

  Google Scholar 

• Vandecasteele, J., and L. Moerland. Groeimodel voor IV-functie – Het systematisch weergeven van een herinrichtingproces. Amstelveen: KPMG Management Consulting, 2001.

  Google Scholar 

Download references