A Note on Reliability-Based Preference Dynamics

1. Dietrich, F., List, C.: Where do preferences come from? International Journal of Game Theory 42(3), 613–637 (2013)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

2. Dryzek, J.S., List, C.: Social choice theory and deliberative democracy: A reconciliation. British Journal of Political Science 33, 1–28 (2003)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Ghosh, S., Velázquez-Quesada, F.R.: Agreeing to agree: Reaching unanimity via preference dynamics based on reliable agents. In: Bordini, R., Elkind, E., Weiss, G., Yolum, P. (eds.) AAMAS 2015, pp. 1491–1499 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

4. Burgess, J.P.: Basic tense logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. II, pp. 89–133. Reidel (1984)

   Google Scholar 

5. Goldblatt, R.: Logics of Time and Computation, 2nd edn. CSLI Lecture Notes, no. 7. Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford (1992)

   Google Scholar 

6. Gargov, G., Passy, S.: A note on boolean modal logic. In: Petkov, P.P. (ed.) Mathematical Logic, pp. 299–309. Springer US (1990)

   Google Scholar 

7. Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Rott, H.: Shifting priorities: Simple representations for 27 iterated theory change operators. In: Lagerlund, H., Lindström, S., Sliwinski, R. (eds.) Modality Matters: Twenty-Five Essays in Honour of Krister Segerberg. Uppsala Philosophical Studies, no. 53, pp. 359–384. University of Uppsala, Upsala (2006)

   Google Scholar 

9. van Benthem, J.: Dynamic logic for belief revision. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2), 129–155 (2007)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

10. van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Synthese Library, no. 337. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

11. van Benthem, J.: Logical Dynamics of Information and Interaction. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

12. van Benthem, J., Liu, F.: Dynamic logic of preference upgrade. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 17(2), 157–182 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Grüne-Yanoff, T., Hansson, S.O.: Preference Change. Theory and Decision Library, vol. 42. Springer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

14. van Eijck, J., Wang, Y.: Propositional dynamic logic as a logic of belief revision. In: Hodges, W., de Queiroz, R. (eds.) WoLLIC 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5110, pp. 136–148. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69937-8_13

    Google Scholar 

15. Baltag, A., Smets, S.: A qualitative theory of dynamic interactive belief revision. In: Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 7). Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 3, pp. 13–60. Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam (2008)

    Google Scholar 

16. Ghosh, S., de Jongh, D.: Comparing strengths of beliefs explicitly. Logic Journal of the IGPL 21(3), 488–514 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Wang, Y., Cao, Q.: On axiomatizations of public announcement logic. Synthese 190(18), 103–134 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. van Benthem, J., van Eijck, J., Kooi, B.: Logics of communication and change. Information and Computation 204(11), 1620–1662 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements and common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Gilboa, I. (ed.) Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (TARK 1998), Evanston, IL, USA, July 22-24, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references