Human Strategic Reasoning in Dynamic Games: Experiments, Logics, Cognitive Models

1. Anderson, J.: How Can Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? OUP (2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Battigalli, P.: Strategic rationality orderings and the best rationalizability principle. Games and Economic Behavior 13, 178–200 (1996)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

3. Bergwerff, G., Meijering, B., Szymanik, J., Verbrugge, R., Wierda, S.: Computational and algorithmic models of strategies in turn-based games. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2014)

   Google Scholar 

4. Bonanno, G.: Axiomatic characterization of the AGM theory of belief revision in a temporal logic. Artificial Intelligence 171(2-3), 144–160 (2007)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

5. Ghosh, S., Heifetz, A., Verbrugge, R.: Do players reason by forward induction in dynamic perfect information games? In: Ramanujam, R. (ed.) Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge (2015), http://www.ai.rug.nl/SocialCognition/papers/#conference

6. Ghosh, S., Meijering, B., Verbrugge, R.: Strategic reasoning: Building cognitive models from logical formulas. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 23(1), 1–29 (2014)

   Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

7. Ghosh, S., Ramanujam, R.: Strategies in games: A logic-automata study. In: Bezhanishvili, N., Goranko, V. (eds.) ESSLLI 2010/2011, Lectures. LNCS, vol. 7388, pp. 110–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

   Google Scholar 

8. Halder, T., Sharma, K., Ghosh, S., Verbrugge, R.: How do adults reason about their opponent? Typologies of players in turn-taking games. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society (2015), http://www.ai.rug.nl/SocialCognition/papers/#conference

9. Marr, D.: Vision. Freeman and Company, New York (1982)

   Google Scholar 

10. McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.R.: An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 803–836 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

11. Meijering, B., Taatgen, N.A., van Rijn, H., Verbrugge, R.: Modeling inference of mental states: As simple as possible, as complex as necessary. Interaction Studies 15(3), 455–477 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

12. Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., Verbrugge, R.: I do know what you think I think: Second-order theory of mind in strategic games is not that difficult. In: Proc. 33rd Annual Conf. Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2486–2491 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

13. Meijering, B., Van Rijn, H., Taatgen, N.A., Verbrugge, R.: What eye movements can tell about theory of mind in a strategic game. PloS One 7(9), e45961 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

14. Nagel, R., Tang, F.F.: Experimental results on the centipede game in normal form: An investigation on learning. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 42(2), 356–384 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

15. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

16. Pacuit, E.: Dynamic models of rational deliberation in games. In: van Benthem, J., Ghosh, S., Verbrugge, R. (eds.) Models of Strategic Reasoning: Logics, Games and Communities. LNCS-FoLLI, vol. 8972, Springer, New York (2015)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

17. Pearce, D.: Rationalizable strategic behaviour and the problem of perfection. Econometrica 52, 1029–1050 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

18. Perea, A.: Epistemic Game Theory: Reasoning and Choice. CUP (2012)

    Google Scholar 

19. Ramanujam, R., Simon, S.: A logical structure for strategies. In: Logic and the Foundations of Game and Decision Theory (LOFT 7). Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 3, pp. 183–208. Amsterdam University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

20. van Benthem, J., Ghosh, S., Liu, F.: Modelling simultaneous games with dynamic logic. Knowledge, Rationality and Action 165, 247–268 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references