Abstract
This paper proposes an analysis in a Feature-based Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (F-LTAG) [9, 18] for deriving the semantic representations of various narrow focus constructions. Te paper presents an extension of the F-LTAG analysis by Balogh [3] based on the syntax-semantics approach by Kallmeyer & Romero [11] and the semantic-pragmatic analysis of focus by Balogh [2].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
See e.g. Babko-Malaya [1].
- 2.
requires, that the proposition that stands for is either equal to or scopes over the proposition that stands for.
- 3.
To keep the examples easier, none of the following examples contain adjunction at the VP node, so in later examples I will skip the \(P\) features at the VP and S nodes.
- 4.
In earlier versions of Inquisitive Semantics [7] these two notions were referred to as the Theme (question) and the Rheme (assertion).
- 5.
Note, that certain details are different – e.g., the representation of proper names – between the InqB representation and a flat semantic representation. This technical detail will not be discussed any further in this paper.
- 6.
Note, that \(?\phi \) is not a separate category in the syntax of the logical language, but it is defined in terms of disjunction as given above.
- 7.
Note, that the language of InqB is used, where \(\exists x.\phi \) leads to a set of possibilities.
References
Babko-Malaya, O.: LTAG semantics of focus. In: Han, C.-H., Sarkar, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the TAG+7: Seventh International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2004)
Balogh, K.: Theme with variations. A context-based analysis of focus. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2009)
Balogh, K.: Representing focus in LTAG. In: Han, C.-H., Satta, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, Inria, Paris (2012)
Bos, J.: Predicate logic unplugged. In: Dekker, P., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. University of Amsterdam (1996)
Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics. Lecture notes for a graduate course at NASSLLI, June 18–22, 2012, Austin, USA (2012)
Groenendijk, Jeroen: Inquisitive semantics: two possibilities for disjunction. In: Bosch, Peter, Gabelaia, David, Lang, Jérôme (eds.) TbiLLC 2007. LNCS, vol. 5422, pp. 80–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. In: Larrazabal, J.M., Zubeldia, L. (eds.) SPR 2009. Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Semantics, Pragmatics and Rhetoric, Universidad del País Vasco, Donostia, Spain (2009)
Jackendoff, R.S.: Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge (1972)
Joshi, A.K., Schabes, Y.: Tree-adjoning grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, pp. 69–123. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Kallmeyer, L., Joshi, A.K.: Factoring predicate argument and scope semantics: underspecified semantics with LTAG. Res. Lang. Comput. 1(1–2), 3–58 (2003)
Kallmeyer, L., Romero, M.: Scope and situation binding in LTAG using semantic unification. Res. Lang. Comput. 6(1), 3–52 (2008)
Krifka, M.: The semantics of questions and the focusation of answers. In: Chungmin, L., Gordon, M., Büring, D. (eds.) Topic and Focus: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)
Mascarenhas, S.: Inquisitive semantics and logic. Master thesis, University of Amsterdam (2009)
Romero, M., Kallmeyer, L., Babko-Malaya, O.: LTAG semantics for questions. In: Han, C.-H., Sarkar, A. (eds.) Proceedings of TAG+7: Seventh International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2004)
Rooth, M.: Association with focus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1985)
Rooth, M.: A theory of focus interpretation. Nat. Lang. Seman. 1(1), 75–116 (1992)
Selkirk, E.: Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: Glodsmith, J.A. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge (1996)
Vijay-Shanker, K., Joshi, A.K.: Feature structure based tree adjoining grammars. In: Proceedings of the COLING, pp. 714–719 (1988)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Balogh, K. (2015). F-LTAG Semantics for Issues Around Focusing. In: Aher, M., Hole, D., Jeřábek, E., Kupke, C. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46906-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46906-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46905-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46906-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)