[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

F-LTAG Semantics for Issues Around Focusing

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Language, and Computation (TbiLLC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8984))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 723 Accesses

Abstract

This paper proposes an analysis in a Feature-based Lexicalized Tree-Adjoining Grammar (F-LTAG) [9, 18] for deriving the semantic representations of various narrow focus constructions. Te paper presents an extension of the F-LTAG analysis by Balogh [3] based on the syntax-semantics approach by Kallmeyer & Romero [11] and the semantic-pragmatic analysis of focus by Balogh [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    See e.g. Babko-Malaya [1].

  2. 2.

    requires, that the proposition that stands for is either equal to or scopes over the proposition that stands for.

  3. 3.

    To keep the examples easier, none of the following examples contain adjunction at the VP node, so in later examples I will skip the \(P\) features at the VP and S nodes.

  4. 4.

    In earlier versions of Inquisitive Semantics [7] these two notions were referred to as the Theme (question) and the Rheme (assertion).

  5. 5.

    Note, that certain details are different – e.g., the representation of proper names – between the InqB representation and a flat semantic representation. This technical detail will not be discussed any further in this paper.

  6. 6.

    Note, that \(?\phi \) is not a separate category in the syntax of the logical language, but it is defined in terms of disjunction as given above.

  7. 7.

    Note, that the language of InqB is used, where \(\exists x.\phi \) leads to a set of possibilities.

References

  1. Babko-Malaya, O.: LTAG semantics of focus. In: Han, C.-H., Sarkar, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the TAG+7: Seventh International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balogh, K.: Theme with variations. A context-based analysis of focus. Ph.D. thesis, ILLC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Balogh, K.: Representing focus in LTAG. In: Han, C.-H., Satta, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammars and Related Formalisms, Inria, Paris (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bos, J.: Predicate logic unplugged. In: Dekker, P., Stokhof, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium. University of Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ciardelli, I., Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics. Lecture notes for a graduate course at NASSLLI, June 18–22, 2012, Austin, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Groenendijk, Jeroen: Inquisitive semantics: two possibilities for disjunction. In: Bosch, Peter, Gabelaia, David, Lang, Jérôme (eds.) TbiLLC 2007. LNCS, vol. 5422, pp. 80–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Groenendijk, J., Roelofsen, F.: Inquisitive semantics and pragmatics. In: Larrazabal, J.M., Zubeldia, L. (eds.) SPR 2009. Proceedings of the ILCLI International Workshop on Semantics, Pragmatics and Rhetoric, Universidad del País Vasco, Donostia, Spain (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jackendoff, R.S.: Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi, A.K., Schabes, Y.: Tree-adjoning grammars. In: Rozenberg, G., Salomaa, A. (eds.) Handbook of Formal Languages, pp. 69–123. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kallmeyer, L., Joshi, A.K.: Factoring predicate argument and scope semantics: underspecified semantics with LTAG. Res. Lang. Comput. 1(1–2), 3–58 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallmeyer, L., Romero, M.: Scope and situation binding in LTAG using semantic unification. Res. Lang. Comput. 6(1), 3–52 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Krifka, M.: The semantics of questions and the focusation of answers. In: Chungmin, L., Gordon, M., Büring, D. (eds.) Topic and Focus: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mascarenhas, S.: Inquisitive semantics and logic. Master thesis, University of Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romero, M., Kallmeyer, L., Babko-Malaya, O.: LTAG semantics for questions. In: Han, C.-H., Sarkar, A. (eds.) Proceedings of TAG+7: Seventh International Workshop on Tree Adjoining Grammar and Related Formalisms, Vancouver, BC, Canada (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rooth, M.: Association with focus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rooth, M.: A theory of focus interpretation. Nat. Lang. Seman. 1(1), 75–116 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Selkirk, E.: Sentence prosody: intonation, stress, and phrasing. In: Glodsmith, J.A. (ed.) The Handbook of Phonological Theory. Blackwell Publishing, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vijay-Shanker, K., Joshi, A.K.: Feature structure based tree adjoining grammars. In: Proceedings of the COLING, pp. 714–719 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kata Balogh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Balogh, K. (2015). F-LTAG Semantics for Issues Around Focusing. In: Aher, M., Hole, D., Jeřábek, E., Kupke, C. (eds) Logic, Language, and Computation. TbiLLC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8984. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46906-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46906-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-46905-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-46906-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics