Multiple-Objective Simulated Annealing Optimization Approach for Vehicle Management in Personal Rapid Transit Systems

1. Won, J.M., Choe, H., Karray, F.: Optimal design of personal rapid transit. In: Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (2006)

   Google Scholar 

2. Won, J.M., et al.: Guideway network design of personalrapid transit system: A multiobjective genetic algorithm approach. In: 2006Ieee Congress on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1-6 (2006)

   Google Scholar 

3. Li, J., Chen, et al.: Optimizing the _eet sizeof a personal rapid transit system: A case study in port of rotterdam. In: 2010 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (2010)

   Google Scholar 

4. Lees-Miller, et al.: Theoretical maximum capacityas benchmark for empty vehicle redistribution in personal rapid transit. TransportationResearch Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2146(1) (2010)

   Google Scholar 

5. Lees-Miller, J.D., Wilson, R.E.: Sampling for personal rapid transit empty vehicleredistribution (2011)

   Google Scholar 

6. Lees-Miller, J.D.: Minimising average passenger waiting time in personal rapidtransit systems. Annals of Operations Research (2013)

   Google Scholar 

7. Daszczuk, W.B.: Empty vehicles management as a method for reducing passengerwaiting time in personal rapid transit networks. IET Intelligent Transport Systems (2014)

   Google Scholar 

8. Mrad, M., Hidri, L.: Optimal consumed electric energy for a personal rapid transition transportation system (2014)

   Google Scholar 

9. Mrad, M., et al.: Synchronous routing for personalrapid transit pods (2014)

   Google Scholar 

10. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt Jr., D., Vecchi, M.P.: Optimization by simmulated annealing. Science 220(4598) (1983)

    Google Scholar 

11. Suppapitnarm, A., Parks, G.: Simulated annealing: an alternative approach totrue multiobjective optimization. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and EvolutionaryComputation Conference (GECCO 1999). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1999)

    Google Scholar 

12. Ulungu, E., Teghem, J., Ost, C.: Efficiency of interactive multi-objective simulated annealing through a case study. Journal of the Operational Research Society 49(10) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

13. Czyzak, P., Hapke, M., Jaszkiewicz, A.: Application of the pareto-simulated annealing to the multiple criteria shortest path problem. Technical Report. Politechnika Poznanska Instytut Informatyki, Poland (1994)

    Google Scholar 

14. Czyzak, P., Jaszkiewicz, A.: Pareto simulated annealing-a metaheuristic techniquefor multiple-objective combinatorial optimization. Journal of Multi-CriteriaDecision Analysis 7(1) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

15. Ulungu, E., et al.: Mosa method: a tool forsolving multiobjective combinatorial optimization problems. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 8(4) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

16. Suman, B.: Simulated annealing-based multiobjective algorithms and their applicationfor system reliability. Engineering Optimization 35(4) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

17. Ahuja, R.K., et al.: A survey of very large-scaleneighborhood search techniques. Discrete Applied Mathematics 123(1-3) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

18. Prins, C.: A simple and effective evolutionary algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Computers & Operations Research 31(12), 1985–2002 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

19. Deb, K., et al.: A fast and elitist multiobjectivegenetic algorithm: Nsga-ii. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

20. Won, J.M., et al.: Guideway network design of personalrapid transit system: A multiobjective genetic algorithm approach. In: IEEE Congress on EvolutionaryComputation, CEC 2006. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

21. Kara, I.: Two indexed polonomyal size formulationsfor vehicle routing problems. Technical Report. BaskentUniversity, Ankara/Turkey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references