Zusammenfassung
Die Entwicklungen zum Web 2.0 haben das World Wide Web (WWW) grundlegend verändert. Nachdem die meisten Nutzer im WWW zunächst „nur“ nach Informationen suchten stellen Nutzer inzwischen sehr ausgiebig Informationen über sich selbst oder ihnen vertraute Themen in Blogs und Communities bereit. Facebook und Wikipedia sind zwei prominente Webseiten. Ihre Attraktivität entstammt allein den Informationen, welche die Nutzer selber zur Verfügung stellen.
Die vorliegende Forschungsarbeit entstand im Rahmen des vom Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie (BMWi) unter dem Förderkennzeichen 01MQ07014 geförderten Forschungsprogramms THESEUS.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Bereits Ende 2006 verfügte Wikipedia auf den englischsprachigen Seiten über eine Community von 46.000 Nutzern, die im laufenden Monat mindestens fünf Beiträge editierten hatten (Wikimedia Foundation 2006).
- 2.
Wie beziehen uns hier und im Folgenden auf die im Kap. A.2 vorgestellten Dimensionen der Informationsqualität.
Literatur
Agichtein, E./Brille, E./Dumais, S.: Improving web search ranking by incorporating user behavior information. In: Proceedings of the 29th annual international ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, August 6–11, 2006, Seattle, Washington.
Antiqueira, L./Graças, M./Nunesm, V./Oliveira, O. N./Da F. Costa, L.: Strong correlations between text quality and complex networks features. In: Physica, A, 373, 2007, S. 811–820.
Blumenstock, J. E.: Automatically Assessing the Quality of Wikipedia Articles. School of Information, Paper 2008-021, 2008.
Cao, Q./Duan, W./Gan, Q.: Exploring determinants of voting for the „helpfulness” of online user reviews: A text mining approach. In: Decision Support Systems, 50 (2), 2011, S. 511–521.
Claypool, M./Le, P./Wased, M./Brown, D.: Implicit interest indicators. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Santa Fe, New Mexico, United States, January 14–17, 2001, IUI ’01, ACM, New York, NY, 2001, S. 33–40.
Cooper, M. D.: Predicting the relevance of a library catalog search. In: Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52 (10), 2001, S. 813–827.
DuBay, W. H.: The Principles of Readability. Impact Information, Costa Mesa, Calif., 2004.
Dufty, D./McNamara, D./Louwerse, M./Cai, Z./Graesser, A.: Automatic Evaluation of Aspects of Document Quality. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: The engineering of quality documentation, 2004.
Garnefeld, I./Iseke, A./Krebs, A.: Explicit Incentives in Online Communities: Boon or Bane? In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (1), 2012, S. 11–38.
Ghose, A./Ipeirotis, P.: Estimating the helpfulness and economic impact of product reviews: Mining text and reviewer characteristics. In: IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 23 (10), 2010, S. 1498–1512.
Giles, J.: Internet encyclopedias go head to head. In: Nature, 43, 2005, S. 900–901.
Golder, S./Huberman, B.: The Structure of Collaborative Tagging Systems. In: Journal of Information Science 32 (2), 2006, S. 198–208.
Graefe, G./Maaß, C./Heß, A.: Alternative Searching Services: Seven Theses on the Importance of “Social Bookmarking”. In: The Social Semantic Web 2007: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Social Semantic Web (CSSW), GI Edition, Lecture Notes in Informatics, 2007, S. 11–21.
Graesser, A. C./McNamara, D. S./Louwerse, M. M./Cai, Z.: Coh-metrix: analysis of text on cohesion and language. In: Behavior Research Methods 36 (2), 2004, S. 193–202.
Hammwöhner, R./Fuchs, K.-P./Kattenbeck, M./Sax, C.: Qualität der Wikipedia – Eine vergleichende Studie. Internationales Symposium Informationswissenschaft, ISI 2007, Köln, 2007.
Hu, N./Bose, I./Koh, N. S./Liu, L.: Manipulation of online reviews: An analysis of ratings, readability, and sentiments. In: Decision Support Systems, 52 (3), 2012, S. 674–684.
Joachims, T./Granka, L./Pan, B./Hembrooke, H./Radlinkski, F./Gay, G.: Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in Web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 25 (2), 2007.
Kelly, J. D.: Understanding Implicit Feedback and Document Preference: a Naturalistic User Study. Doctoral Thesis, UMI Order Number: AAI3117613, Rutgers University, 2004.
Kim, J./Oard, D. W./Romanik, K.: Using implicit feedback for user modeling in internet and intranet searching. University of Maryland, CLIS, Technical Report 00–01, 2000.
Koch, M./Richter, A.: Enterprise 2.0– Planung, Einführung und erfolgreicher Einsatz von Social Software in Unternehmen. Oldenburg Wissenschaftsverlag, München, Germany, 2008.
Konstan, J./Miller, B./Maltz, D./Herlocker, J./Gordon, L./Riedl, J.: GroupLens: applying collaborative filtering to Usenet news. Communications of the ACM 40 (3), 1997, S. 77–87.
Korfiatis, N./Garcia-Bariocanal, E./Sánchez-Alonso, S.: Evaluating content quality and helpfulness of online product reviews: The interplay of review helpfulness vs. review content. In: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11 (3), 2012, S. 205–217.
Lawrence, S./Bollacker, K./Giles, C. L.: Indexing and retrieval of scientific literature. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (Kansas City, Missouri, United States, November 02–06, 1999), S. Gauch, Ed. CIKM ’99, ACM, New York, NY, 1999, S. 139–146.
Li, M./Huang, L./Tan, C.-H./Wie, K.-K.: Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: Source and content features. In: International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17 (4), 2013, S. 101–136.
Lih, A: Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource. 5th International Symposium on Online Journalism, April 16–17, 2004.
Ludwig, S./de Ruyter, K./Friedman, M./Brüggen, E. C./Wetzels, M./Pfann, G.: More than words: The influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates, In: Journal of Marketing, 77 (1), 2013, S. 87–103.
Ng, K. B./Kantor, P./Strzalkowski, T./Wacholder, N./Tang, R./Bai, B./Rittman, R./Song, P./Sun, Y.: Automated judgment of document qualities: Research Articles. In: American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57 (9), 2006, S. 1155–1164.
Nichols, D.: Implicit ratings and filtering. In: Proceedings of the 5th DELOS Workshop on Filtering and Collaborative Filtering, Budapest, Hungary 10–12, ERCIM, 1997.
Rheinberg, F.: Intrinsische Motivation und Flow-Erleben. In: Heckhausen, J./Heckhausen, H. (Hrsg.): Motivation und Handeln, 3. Aufl., Heidelberg, 2006, S. 331–354.
Rucker, J./Polanco, M. J.: Siteseer: personalized navigation for the Web. In: Communications of the ACM, 40 (3), 1997, S. 73–76.
Seo, Y./Zhang, B.: Learning user’s preferences by analyzing Web-browsing behaviors. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Barcelona, Spain, June 03–07, 2000), AGENTS ’00, ACM, New York, NY, 2000; S. 381–387.
Stvilia B./Twidale, M. B./Smith, L.C./Gasser, L.: Assessing information quality of a community-based encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Quality – ICIQ 2005, S. 442–454.
Tang, R./Ng, K. B./Strzalkowski, T./Kantor, P. B.: Automatically Predicting Information Quality in News Documents. In: Proceedings of Human Language Technology – North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2003.
White, R. W.: Implicit Feedback for Interactive Information Retrieval. Doctoral Thesis, Glasgow University, 2004.
Wikimedia Foundation. http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediansEditsGt5.htm.
Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 29. August 2014, 12:51h) and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Featured_article_criteria (letzte Änderung vom 25. January 2014, 16:41h).
Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Splitting (letzte Änderung vom 26. August 2014, 16:35h).
Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_for_nominating_good_articles (letzte Änderung vom 3. August 2014, 00:34h).
Wikimedia Foundation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism (letzte Änderung vom 5. September 2014, 19:55h).
Willemsen, L. M./Neijens, P. C./Bronner, F./de Ridder, J. A.: “Highly recommended!” The content characteristics and perceived usefulness of online consumer reviews. In: Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17 (1), 2011, S. 19–38.
Yanbe, Y./Jatowt, A./Nakamura, S./Tanaka, K.: Can social bookmarking enhance search in the web? In: Proceedings of the 2007 Conference on Digital Libraries, June 18–23, 2007, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2007, S. 107–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ahlheid, S., Gräfe, G., Krebs, A., Schuster, D. (2018). Bewertung der Informationsqualität im Enterprise 2.0. In: Hildebrand, K., Gebauer, M., Hinrichs, H., Mielke, M. (eds) Daten- und Informationsqualität. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21994-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-21994-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-21993-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-21994-9
eBook Packages: Computer Science and Engineering (German Language)