Abstract
This paper discusses main problems associated with evaluation of performance and impact of long-term environmental programs. Lack of data standards, incompleteness of archived datasets and insufficient statistical power were identified as main limits in functionality of monitoring networks. To avoid these failures, environmental programs should be designed with inception to incorporate data management as their integral part. Especially in global programs, local and regional data managers should invest significant proportion of their effort to handle documentation in terms of standardized coding, data formats, metadata coding and consistency of records over time. Up-to-date trends in building knowledge-based infrastructures are illustrated using example of monitoring of atmospheric pollution by persistent organic pollutants (POPs). Conceptual model usable to facilitate the integration and analysis of data on POPs concentrations is introduced with its multilayer hierarchy of entities (POPs as nomenclature classes, couples “observation – measurement” as content classes). Robust set of statistical methods for processing of time series of concentration data is discussed from the viewpoint of practical implementation within running monitoring programs. It consists of the following components: baseline pollution estimates, uncertainty analyses, spatial extrapolations, effect size estimates, time trend identification and quantification. Development of tools supporting standardized environmental data management is rapidly expanding field of science which results in the following challenges for applied informatics and statistics: log-term sustainability of information systems, data-related metadata coding and archiving, tools for automated integration and reporting of data.
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mickwitz, P.: A framework for evaluating environmental policy instruments: Context and key concepts. Evaluation 9, 415–436 (2003)
Crabbé, A., Leroy, P.: The handbook of environmental policy evaluation. Earthscan, London (2008)
Goodchild, M.F.: Communicating the results of accuracy assessment: metadata, digital libraries, and assessing fitness for use. In: Mowrer, H.T., Congalton, R.G. (eds.) Quantifying Spatial Uncertainty in Natural Resources: Theory and Applications for GIS and Remote Sensing, pp. 3–15. CRC Press (2000)
Rönnbäck, B.I., Nordberg, M.L., Olsson, A., Östman, A.: Evaluation of environmental monitoring strategies. Ambio 32, 495–501 (2003)
Gray, J., Liu, D., Nieto-Santisteban, M., Szalay, A., DeWitt, D., Heber, G.: Scientific Data Management in the Coming Decade. CTWatch Quarterly 1, 17–26 (2005)
Brunt, J.W., McCartney, P., Baker, K., Stafford, S.G.: The future of eco-informatics in long-term ecological research. The International Institute of Informatics and Systemics IIIS 7. In: Proceedings of the 6th World Multi-Conference on Systematics, Cybernetics and Informatics, Orlando, FL, USA, July 14–18, pp. 367–372 (2002)
Dardari, D., Conti, A., Buratti, C., Verdone, R.: Mathematical evaluation of environmental monitoring estimation error through energy-efficient wireless sensor networks. IEEE. Trans. Mob. Comput. 6, 790–802 (2007)
Svenfelt, A., Engström, R., Hojer, M.: Use of explorative scenarios in environmental policy-making-Evaluation of policy instruments for management of land, water and the built environment. Futures 42, 1166–1175 (2010)
Mermet, L., Bille, R., Leroy, M.: Concern-Focused Evaluation for Ambiguous and Conflicting Policies: An Approach From the Environmental Field. Am. J. Eval. 31, 180–198 (2010)
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): EPA requirements for quality assurance project plans. EPA QA/R-5, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC (2001)
EPA (Environmental Protection Agency): STORET, EPA’s largest computerized environmental data system (2008), http://www.epa.gov/storet/
Michener, W.K., Brunt, J.W.: Ecological Data: Design, Management and Processing. Blackwell Science, Oxford (2000)
Jones, M.B., Schildhauer, M., Reichman, O.J., Bowers, S.: The New Bioinformatics: integrating ecological data from the gene to the biosphere. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 37, 519–544 (2006)
Elmagarmid, A., Rusinkiewicz, M., Sheth, A.: Management of Heterogeneous and Autonomous Database Systems, vol. 4. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)
Grossman, D.A., Frieder, O.: Information Retrieval: Algorithms and Heuristics. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Darwin Core: Darwin Core Schema (version 1.3), a draft standard of the Taxonomic Database Working Group (TDWG), http://wiki.tdwg.org/DarwinCore
DCMI: DCMI Metadata Terms, http://www.dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms
Huang, P.S., Shih, L.H.: Effective environmental management through environmental knowledge management. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Tech. 6, 35–50 (2009)
Madin, J., Bowers, S., Schildhauer, M., Krivov, S., Pennington, D., Villa, F.: An ontology for describing and synthesizing ecological observation data. Int. J. Ecol. Informatics 2, 279–296 (2007)
Williams, R.J., Martinez, N.D., Golbeck, J.: Ontologies for ecoinformatics. J. Web Semant. 4, 237–242 (2006)
Hale, S.S., Hollister, J.W.: Beyond data management: how ecoinformatics can benefit environmental monitoring programs. Environ. Monit. Assess. 150, 227–235 (2009)
Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (POPs): Interim Secretariat for the Stockholm Convention, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP) Chemicals: Geneva, Switzerland (October 2001), http://chm.pops.int
Klanova, J., Harner, T.: The challenge of producing reliable results under highly variable conditions and the role of passive air samplers in the Global Monitoring Plan. Trends Anal. Chem. 46, 139–149 (2013)
Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention: UNEP Report of the First Expert Meeting to update the Guidance on the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants (2010), http://chm.pops.int/Programmes/GlobalMonitoringPlan/Meetings/GMP1stExpertMeeting2010/tabid/760/ctl/Download/mid/3261/language/en-US/Default.aspx
United Nations Environment Programme: Guidance on the Global Monitoring Plan for Persistent Organic Pollutants. Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, Geneva (2007)
Berkley, C., Jones, M.B., Bojilova, J., Higgins, D.: Metacat: a schema-independent XML database system. In: Proc. of the 13th Intl. Conf. on Scientific and Statistical Database Management. IEEE Computer Society Press (2001)
Borgida, A.: Description logics in data management. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 7, 671–682 (1995)
Cook, R.B., Olson, R.J., Kanciruk, P., Hook, L.A.: Best practices for preparing ecological data sets to share and archive. Bulleting of the Ecological Society of America 82, 138–141 (2001)
Cornélis, B., Brunet, S.: A policy-maker point of view on uncertainties in spatial decisions. In: Shi, W., Fisher, P.F., Goodchild, M.F. (eds.) Spatial Data Quality, pp. 168–185. Taylor & Francis (2002)
Hartigan, J.A., Hartigan, P.M.: The Dip Test of Unimodality. Ann of Stat. 13, 70–84 (1985)
Hůlek, R., Jarkovský, J., Borůvková, J., Kalina, J., Gregor, J., Šebková, K., Schwarz, D., Klánová, J., Dušek, L.: Global Monitoring Plan of the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants: visualization and on-line analysis of data from the monitoring reports. Masaryk University (2013), http://www.pops-gmp.org/visualization
Christensen, S.W., Brandt, C.C., McCracken, M.K.: Importance of data management in a long-term biological monitoring program. Environ. Manage. 47, 1112–1124 (2011)
Emerson, K.J., Merz, C.R., Catchen, J.M., Hohenlohe, P.A., Cresko, W.A., Bradshaw, W.E., Holzapfel, C.M.: Resolving postglacial phylogeography using high-throughput sequencing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16196–16200 (2010)
Sork, V.L., Waits, L.: Introduction: contributions of landscape genetics approaches, insights, and future potential. Mol. Ecol. 19, 3489–3495 (2010)
Metzger, K.J., Klaper, R., Thomas, M.A.: Implications of informatics approaches in ecological research. Ecological Informatics 6, 4–12 (2011)
Ozmen-Ertekin, D., Ozbay, K.: Dynamic data maintenance for quality data, quality research. Int. J. Inform. Manage. 32, 282–293 (2012)
Michener, W.K.: Meta-information concepts for ecological data management. Ecol. Inform. 1, 3–7 (2006)
Horsburgh, J.S., Tarboton, D.G., Piasecki, M., Maidment, D.R., Zaslavsky, I., Valentine, D., Whitenack, T.: An integrated system for publishing environmental observations data. Environ. Modell. Softw. 24, 879–888 (2009)
Bertzky, M., Stoll-Kleemann, S.: Multi-level discrepancies with sharing data on protected areas: What we have and what we need for the global village. J. Environ. Manage. 90, 8–24 (2009)
Michener, W.K., Jones, M.B.: Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science Trends Ecol. Evol. 27, 85–93 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dušek, L. et al. (2013). Estimating Impacts of Environmental Interventions in Monitoring Programs Requires Conceptual Data Models and Robust Statistical Processing. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Kubásek, M., Rizzoli, A.E. (eds) Environmental Software Systems. Fostering Information Sharing. ISESS 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 413. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41151-9_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41150-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41151-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)