[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to main content

Using State-Based Planning Heuristics for Partial-Order Causal-Link Planning

  • Conference paper
KI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8077))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a technique which allows partial-order causal-link (POCL) planning systems to use heuristics known from state-based planning to guide their search.

The technique encodes a given partially ordered partial plan as a new classical planning problem that yields the same set of solutions reachable from the given partial plan. As heuristic estimate of the given partial plan a state-based heuristic can be used estimating the goal distance of the initial state in the encoded problem. This technique also provides the first admissible heuristics for POCL planning, simply by using admissible heuristics from state-based planning. To show the potential of our technique, we conducted experiments where we compared two of the currently strongest heuristics from state-based planning with two of the currently best-informed heuristics from POCL planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
£29.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
GBP 19.95
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
GBP 35.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
GBP 44.99
Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bercher, P., Biundo, S.: Encoding partial plans for heuristic search. In: Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling (KEPS 2013), pp. 11–15 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blum, A.L., Furst, M.L.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90, 281–300 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Coles, A., Coles, A., Fox, M., Long, D.: Forward-chaining partial-order planning. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2010), pp. 42–49. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dräger, K., Finkbeiner, B., Podelski, A.: Directed model checking with distance-preserving abstractions. In: Valmari, A. (ed.) SPIN 2006. LNCS, vol. 3925, pp. 19–34. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fikes, R.E., Nilsson, N.J.: STRIPS: A new approach to the application of theorem proving to problem solving. Artificial Intelligence 2, 189–208 (1971)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Haslum, P., Geffner, H.: Admissible heuristics for optimal planning. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (AIPS 2000), pp. 140–149. AAAI Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Helmert, M.: The fast downward planning system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 26, 191–246 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Helmert, M., Domshlak, C.: Landmarks, critical paths and abstractions: Whats the difference anyway? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2009), vol. 9, pp. 162–169 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Helmert, M., Haslum, P., Hoffmann, J.: Flexible abstraction heuristics for optimal sequential planning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2007), pp. 176–183 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The FF planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Joslin, D., Pollack, M.E.: Least-cost flaw repair: A plan refinement strategy for partial-order planning. In: Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1994), pp. 1004–1009. AAAI Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kambhampati, S.: Refinement planning as a unifying framework for plan synthesis. AI Magazine 18(2), 67–98 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McAllester, D., Rosenblitt, D.: Systematic nonlinear planning. In: Proceedings of the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1991), pp. 634–639. AAAI Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Muise, C., McIlraith, S.A., Beck, J.C.: Monitoring the execution of partial-order plans via regression. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 1975–1982. AAAI Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nebel, B., Bäckström, C.: On the computational complexity of temporal projection, planning, and plan validation. Artificial Intelligence 66(1), 125–160 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Nguyen, X., Kambhampati, S.: Reviving partial order planning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 459–466. Morgan Kaufmann (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Penberthy, J.S., Weld, D.S.: UCPOP: A sound, complete, partial order planner for ADL. In: Proceedings of the third International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 103–114. Morgan Kaufmann (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ramírez, M., Geffner, H.: Plan recognition as planning. In: Boutilier, C. (ed.) Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 1778–1783. AAAI Press (July 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Seegebarth, B., Müller, F., Schattenberg, B., Biundo, S.: Making hybrid plans more clear to human users – a formal approach for generating sound explanations. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2012), pp. 225–233. AAAI Press (June 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vidal, V., Geffner, H.: Branching and pruning: An optimal temporal POCL planner based on constraint programming. Artificial Intelligence 170(3), 298–335 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Weld, D.S.: Systematic nonlinear planning: A commentary. AI Magazine 32(1), 101–103 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Younes, H.L.S., Simmons, R.G.: VHPOP: Versatile heuristic partial order planner. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 20, 405–430 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bercher, P., Geier, T., Biundo, S. (2013). Using State-Based Planning Heuristics for Partial-Order Causal-Link Planning. In: Timm, I.J., Thimm, M. (eds) KI 2013: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8077. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40942-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40942-4_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40941-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40942-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics