Packet Inspection — Shifting the Paradigm of Fundamental Rights

1. Boehme-Neßler, V.: Unscharfes Grundgesetz — Anmerkungen zum Verfassungsrecht in der digitalisierten Welt. In: Institut für Wirtschaftsrecht, 60 Jahre Grundgesetz, pp. 155–188. Kassel University Press (2010)

   Google Scholar 

2. Roßnagel, A., Mayer-Tasch, P. C., Saladin, P. V.: Radioaktiver Zerfall der Grundrechte: Zur Verfassungsvertraglichkeit der Kernenergie. Beck, München (1984)

   Google Scholar 

3. Champagne, A.: Watching over you. In: Le Monde diplomatique (January 2012), http://mondediplo.com/2012/03/16internet

4. Brodkin, J.: Iran reportedly blocking encrypted Internet traffic (February 2012), http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2012/02/iran-reportedly-blocking-encrypted-internet-traffic.ars

5. Ingham, K., Forrest, S.: A History and Survey of Network Firewalls, A history and survey of network firewalls. Tech. Rep. TR-CS-2002-37, University of New Mexico Computer Science Department (2002)

   Google Scholar 

6. Serpanos, D.N., Wolf, T.: Architecture of network systems. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2011)

   Book  Google Scholar 

7. Anderson, N.: Deep packet inspection meets ’Net neutrality, CALEA, vom 25 July (2007), http://arstechnica.com/hardware/news/2007/07/Deep-packet-inspection-meets-net-neutrality.ars/2

8. IEEE 802.3 Ethernet, http://standards.ieee.org/about/get/802/802.3.html

9. IEEE P802.3ba 40Gb/s and 100Gb/s Ethernet Task Force Public Area, http://www.ieee802.org/3/ba/public/index.html

10. Ipoque, Deep packet inspection solutions for network operators, http://ipoque.com/en/products/pace-network-analysis-with-deep-packet-inspection

11. Netronome, http://www.netronome.com/pages/heterogeneous-architecture

12. AdvancedTCA Specifications for Next Generation Telecommunications Equipment, http://www.picmg.org/v2internal/resourcepage2.cfm?id=2

13. Liberatore, M., Levine, B.N.: Inferring the Source of Encrypted HTTP Connections. In: CCS 2006: Proceedings of the 13th ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 255–263. ACM Press, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

14. Alshammari, R., Nur Zincir-Heywood, A.: Can encrypted traffic be identified without port number, IP addresses and payload inspection? Computer Networks 55, 1326–1350 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hjelmvik, E., John, W.: Breaking and Improving Protocol Obfuscation, Dep. of Computer Science and Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Technical Report No. 2010-05 (2010) ISSN 1652- 926X, http://publications.lib.chalmers.se/cpl/record/index.xsql?pubid=123751

16. Webb, A.: Statistical Pattern Recognition. Wiley, Chichester (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

17. Ipoque, Net Reporter, http://ipoque.com/en/products/net-reporter

18. Procera, Products, http://www.proceranetworks.com/pdf/products/overview/Procera_Overview_Brochure_mech_2012-4-8.pdf

19. Packet Clearing House, Internet Exchange Directory, https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/?show_active_only=0&sort=traffic&order=desc

20. Nguyen, T.T.T., Armitage, G.: A survey of techniques for internet traffic classification using machine learning. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials 10(4), 56–76 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Ipoque, Products, http://ipoque.com/en/products

22. Bendrath, R.: Global technology trends and national regulation: Explaining Variation in the Governance of Deep Packet Inspection (2009), http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/bendrath/ISA09_Paper_Ralf%20Bendrath_DPI.pdf

23. Plusnet, http://www.plus.net/broadband/?source=subBox

24. Pfanner, E.: 3 Internet Providers in Deal for Tailored Ads, http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/18/technology/18target.html?_r=1&oref=slogin

25. Kindsight: Subscription options, http://www.kindsight.net/en/solution/subscription

26. European Council Resolution on the lawful interception of telecommunications (96/C 329/01), http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31996G1104:EN:HTML

27. Kent, S., Seo, K.: Security Architecture for the Internet Protocol, RFC 4301 (2005), http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4301

28. Hoeren, T.: Google Analytics — datenschutzrechtlich unbedenklich? Zeitschrift für Datenschutz (ZD) 1/2001, 3–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

29. Convention Committee on Cybercrime, Convention on Cybercrime, http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/EN/Treaties/html/185.htm

30. Decision of the German Federal Constitutional Court, BVerfG, 1 BvR 256/08 vom 2.3 (March 2, 2010), http://www.bverfg.de/entscheidungen/rs20100302_1bvr025608.html

31. Gilroy, A.A.: Access to Broadband Networks: The Net Neutrality Debate. CRS Report for Congress (2011)

    Google Scholar 

32. Dischinger, M., Marcon, M., Guha, S., Gummadi, K.P., Mahajan, R., Saroiu, S.: Glasnost: Enabling End Users to Detect Traffic Differentiation. In: Proceedings of the 7th USENIX Conference on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

33. Kanuparthy, P., Dovrolis, C.: Diffprobe: Detecting ISP service discrimination. In: 2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 1–9 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

34. Basso, S., Servetti, A., De Martin, J.C.: The network neutrality bot architecture: a preliminary approach for self-monitoring of Internet access QoS. In: Proceedings of ISCC 2011, pp. 1131–1136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references