Designing Intrinsically Motivating User Interfaces for the Ageing Population

1. Blaschke, C.M., Freddolino, P.P., Mullen, E.E.: Ageing and Technology: A Review of the Research Literature. Journal of Social Work 39(4), 641–656 (2009)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Hawthorn, D.: Possible implications of aging for interface designers. Interacting with Computers 12(5), 507–528 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Ofcom, Older people and communications technology, Ofcom Consumer Panel (2006)

   Google Scholar 

4. Carstensen, L.L., Isaacowitz, D.M., Charles, S.T.: Taking time seriously - A theory of socioemotional selectivity. American Psychologist 54(3), 165–181 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Melenhorst, A.S., Rogers, W.A., Caylor, E.C.: The Use of Communication Technologies by Older Adults: Exploring the Benefits from the User’s Perspective. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings 45(3), 221–225 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry 11(4), 227–268 (2000)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Flow: the psychology of optimal experience. Harper & Row, New York (1990)

   Google Scholar 

8. Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 5(4), 333–369 (1981)

   Article  Google Scholar 

9. Cury, F., et al.: The social-cognitive model of achievement motivation and the 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 90(4), 666–679 (2006)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Goldhaber, T., Langdon, P., Clarkson, J.: Intrinsic Motivation and Design of ICT for the Ageing Population. In: Langdon, P., et al. (eds.) Designing Inclusive Systems. Springer, London (2012)

    Google Scholar 

11. Ryan, R.M., Koestner, R., Deci, E.L.: Varied forms of persistence: When free-choice behavior is not intrinsically motivated. Motivation and Emotion 15, 185–205 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Ryan, R.M., Mims, V., Koestner, R.: Relation of Reward Contingency and Interpersonal Context to Intrinsic Motivation - a Review and Test Using Cognitive Evaluation Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45(4), 736–750 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. University of Rochester Department of Clinical & Social Sciences in Psychology. Self-Determination Theory: An approach to human motivation & personality. Questionnaires (August 9, 2011), http://www.psych.rochester.edu/SDT/questionnaires.php (cited August 9, 2011)

14. Przybylski, A.K., Rigby, C.S., Ryan, R.M.: A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement. Review of General Psychology 14(2), 154–166 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Hicks, W.D., Klimoski, R.J.: Entry into Training-Programs and Its Effects on Training Outcomes - a Field Experiment. Academy of Management Journal 30(3), 542–552 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Zweig, D., Webster, J.: Validation of a multidimensional measure of goal orientation. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science-Revue Canadienne Des Sciences Du Comportement 36(3), 232–243 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

17. Postkammer, P., Smith, P.L.: Sex-Differences in Career Self-Efficacy, Consideration, and Interests of 8th and 9th Graders. Journal of Counseling Psychology 32(4), 551–559 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Betz, N.E., Hackett, G.: The Relationship of Career-Related Self-Efficacy Expectations to Perceived Career Options in College-Women and Men. Journal of Counseling Psychology 28(5), 399–410 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Busch, T.: Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward Computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 12(2), 147–158 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. Murphy, C.A., Coover, D., Owen, S.V.: Development and Validation of the Computer Self-Efficacy Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement 49(4), 893–899 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Booth, A.L.: Gender and Competition. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 4300, pp. 1–30 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

22. Byrnes, J.P., Miller, D.C., Schafer, W.D.: Gender differences in risk taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 125(3), 367–383 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Niederle, M., Yestrumskas, A.H.: Gender Differences in Seeking Challenges: The Role of Institutions, Stanford University (2008)

    Google Scholar 

24. Datta Gupta, N., Poulsen, A., Villeval, M.C.: Male and female competitive behaviour: Experimental evidence. IZA Discussion Papers, No. 1833 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

25. Dweck, C.S.: Is Math a Gift? Beliefs That Put Females at Risk. In: Ceci, S.J., Williams, W. (eds.) Why Aren’t More Women in Science? Top Researchers Debate the Evidence, American Psychological Associaiton, Washington, DC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

26. Licht, B.G., Dweck, C.S.: Determinants of Academic-Achievement - the Interaction of Childrens Achievement Orientations with Skill Area. Developmental Psychology 20(4), 628–636 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

27. Koszegi, B.: Ego utility, overconfidence, and task choice. Journal of the European Economic Association 4(4), 673–707 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references